Treatment of Thrombocytopenia in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease Undergoing an Elective Procedure

NCT ID: NCT01976104

Last Updated: 2018-02-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

204 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-11-30

Study Completion Date

2017-02-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study using avatrombopag to treat adults with thrombocytopenia associated with liver disease. The study will evaluate avatrombopag in the treatment of thrombocytopenia associated with liver disease prior to an elective procedure to reduce the need for platelet transfusions or any rescue procedure for bleeding due to procedural and post-procedural bleeding complications. Participants will be enrolled into 2 cohorts according to mean baseline platelet count and, within each baseline platelet count cohort will be further stratified by risk of bleeding associated with the elective procedure (low, moderate, or high) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) status (Yes or No).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study will consist of 3 phases: Prerandomization, Randomization, and a Follow-up Phase. The Prerandomization Phase includes one Screening Visit that will take place from Day -14 through Day -1; the Randomization Phase includes the Baseline Period, Treatment Period, and Procedure Day Period (5 to 8 days after last dose of study drug \[Study Day 10 to 13\]). The Follow-up Phase comprises 2 visits: 7 days post Procedure Day and 30 days after receiving the last dose of study drug. Permitted procedures include: Paracentesis; Thoracentesis; Gastrointestinal endoscopy with or without plans for biopsy, colonoscopy, polypectomy, or variceal banding; Liver biopsy; Bronchoscopy with or without plans for biopsy; Ethanol ablation therapy or chemoembolization for HCC; Vascular catheterization (including right side procedures in participants with pulmonary hypertension); Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; Dental procedures; Renal biopsy; Biliary interventions; Nephrostomy tube placement; Radiofrequency ablation; and Laparoscopic interventions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thrombocytopenia Associated With Liver Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A (avatrombopag, lower baseline platelet count)

60 mg avatrombopag (3 x 20 mg tablets) once daily on Days 1 through 5

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

avatrombopag (lower baseline platelet count)

Intervention Type DRUG

60 mg avatrombopag (3 x 20 mg tablets)

Group B (placebo, lower baseline platelet count)

placebo (3 x 20 mg matching placebo tablets) once daily on Days 1 through 5

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo (lower baseline platelet count)

Intervention Type DRUG

60 mg placebo (3 x 20 mg matching placebo tablets)

Group C (avatrombopag, higher baseline platelet count)

40 mg avatrombopag (2 x 20 mg tablets) once daily on Days 1 through 5

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

avatrombopag (higher baseline platelet count)

Intervention Type DRUG

40 mg avatrombopag (2 x 20 mg tablets)

Group D (placebo, higher baseline platelet count)

placebo (2 x 20 mg matching placebo tablets) once daily on Days 1 through 5

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo (higher baseline platelet count)

Intervention Type DRUG

40 mg placebo (2 x 20 mg matching placebo tablets)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

avatrombopag (lower baseline platelet count)

60 mg avatrombopag (3 x 20 mg tablets)

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo (lower baseline platelet count)

60 mg placebo (3 x 20 mg matching placebo tablets)

Intervention Type DRUG

avatrombopag (higher baseline platelet count)

40 mg avatrombopag (2 x 20 mg tablets)

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo (higher baseline platelet count)

40 mg placebo (2 x 20 mg matching placebo tablets)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Participants greater than or equal to 18 years of age at Screening with chronic liver disease
2. Participants who have a mean baseline platelet count of less than 50 x 10\^9/L. Platelet counts must be measured on 2 separate occasions, during the Screening Period and at Baseline, and must be performed at least one day apart with neither platelet count greater than 60 x 10\^9/L. The mean of these 2 platelet counts (mean baseline platelet count) will be used for entry criteria and for assignment to the low or high baseline platelet count cohort.
3. Participants scheduled to undergo a permitted elective procedure who, in the opinion of the investigator, will require a platelet transfusion to address a risk of bleeding associated with the procedure unless there is a clinically significant increase in platelet count from baseline
4. Model For End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score less than or equal to 24 at Screening
5. If taking inhibitors of P glycoprotein (P-gp), except for verapamil, dose must be stable for 7 days prior to Screening
6. Provide written informed consent
7. Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol

Exclusion Criteria

1. Any history of arterial or venous thrombosis, including partial or complete thrombosis
2. Evidence of thrombosis (partial or complete) in the main portal vein, portal vein branches, or any part of the splenic mesenteric system at Screening
3. Portal vein blood flow velocity rate \<10 centimeters/second at Screening
4. Hepatic encephalopathy that cannot be effectively treated
5. Participants with HCC with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging classification C or D
6. Platelet transfusion or receipt of blood products containing platelets within 7 days of Screening. However packed red blood cells are permitted.
7. Heparin, warfarin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), aspirin, verapamil, and antiplatelet therapy with ticlopidine or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists (eg, tirofiban) within 7 days of Screening
8. Use of erythropoietin stimulating agents within 7 days of Screening
9. Interferon (IFN) use within 14 days of Screening
10. Estrogen-containing hormonal contraceptive or hormone replacement therapy use within 30 days of Screening
11. Active infection requiring systemic antibiotic therapy within 7 days of Screening. However, prophylactic use of antibiotics is permitted.
12. Alcohol abuse, alcohol dependence syndrome, drug abuse, or drug dependence within 6 months of the study start (unless participating in a controlled rehabilitation program) or acute alcoholic hepatitis (chronic alcoholic hepatitis is allowed) within 6 months of the study start
13. Elective procedure performed prior to Visit 4 (Procedure Day)
14. Known to be human immunodeficiency virus positive
15. Any clinically significant acute or active bleeding (eg, gastrointestinal, central nervous system)
16. Known history of any primary hematologic disorder (eg, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, myelodysplastic syndrome)
17. Known medical history of genetic prothrombotic syndromes (eg, Factor V Leiden; prothrombin G20210A; ATIII deficiency, etc.)
18. Participants with a history of significant cardiovascular disease (eg, congestive heart failure New York Heart Association Grade III/IV, arrhythmia known to increase the risk of thromboembolic events \[eg, atrial fibrillation\], coronary artery stent placement, angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass grafting)
19. Females of childbearing potential who have had unprotected sexual intercourse within 30 days before study entry and who do not agree to use a highly effective method of contraception (eg, total abstinence, an intrauterine device, a double-barrier method \[such as condom plus diaphragm with spermicide\], a progesterone-only contraceptive implant/injection, or have a vasectomized partner with confirmed azoospermia) throughout the entire study period and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation. If currently abstinent, the participant must agree to use a double-barrier method as described above if she becomes sexually active during the study period or for 30 days after study drug discontinuation. All females will be considered to be of childbearing potential unless they are postmenopausal (at least 12 months consecutive amenorrhea in the appropriate age group and without other known or suspected cause) or have been sterilized surgically (ie, bilateral tubal ligation, hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy) at least 1 month before dosing.
20. Females who are lactating or pregnant at Screening or Baseline (as documented by a positive serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin \[B-hCG\] test with a minimum sensitivity 25 IU/L or equivalent units of B-hCG). A separate baseline assessment is required if a negative screening pregnancy test was obtained more than 72 hours before the first dose of study drug.
21. Post liver transplant subjects
22. Any participant who has previously received avatrombopag
23. Hypersensitivity to avatrombopag maleate or any of its excipients
24. Hemoglobin levels ≤ 8.0 or ≥ 18.0 g/dL for men and \> 15 for women at Screening, with hematocrit ≥ 54% for men and ≥ 45% for women
25. Current malignancy including solid tumors and hematologic malignancies (except HCC)
26. Any history of concomitant medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator(s), would compromise the participant's ability to safely complete the study
27. Currently enrolled in another clinical trial with any investigational drug or device within 30 days of Screening
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eisai Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Coronado, California, United States

Site Status

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Statesville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Rosario, , Argentina

Site Status

Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Footscray, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Aracaju, , Brazil

Site Status

Botucatu, , Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Salvador, , Brazil

Site Status

Calgary, , Canada

Site Status

Edmonton, , Canada

Site Status

Hefei, Anhui, China

Site Status

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China

Site Status

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

Site Status

Xi’an, Shanxi, China

Site Status

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Hangzhou, Zheijiang, China

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Havířov, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Ústí nad Labem, , Czechia

Site Status

Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France

Site Status

Clichy, Hauts De Seine, France

Site Status

Rennes, Ille Et Vilaine, France

Site Status

Lyon, Rhone, France

Site Status

Villejuif, Val De Marne, France

Site Status

Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Holon, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Nahariya, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Rehovot, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Baggiovara, Modena, Italy

Site Status

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Pisa, , Italy

Site Status

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Trento, , Italy

Site Status

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Nishinomiya, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Morioka, Iwate, Japan

Site Status

Takamatsu, Kagawa-ken, Japan

Site Status

Yufu, Oita Prefecture, Japan

Site Status

Okayama, Okayama-ken, Japan

Site Status

Osaka, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Osaka-Sayama-shi, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Iruma, Saitama, Japan

Site Status

Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Chiyoda City, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Musashino, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Chiba, , Japan

Site Status

Niigata, , Japan

Site Status

Okayama, , Japan

Site Status

Tokushima, , Japan

Site Status

Wakayama, , Japan

Site Status

Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

Orizaba, Veracruz, Mexico

Site Status

Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico

Site Status

Durango, , Mexico

Site Status

Arad, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Sibiu, , Romania

Site Status

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Kemerovo, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Samara, , Russia

Site Status

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Cáceres, Cáceres, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Girona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Zaragoza, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Belgium Brazil Canada China Czechia France Germany Israel Italy Japan Mexico Romania Russia Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Poordad F, Terrault NA, Alkhouri N, Tian W, Allen LF, Rabinovitz M. Avatrombopag, an Alternate Treatment Option to Reduce Platelet Transfusions in Patients with Thrombocytopenia and Chronic Liver Disease-Integrated Analyses of 2 Phase 3 Studies. Int J Hepatol. 2020 Jan 25;2020:5421632. doi: 10.1155/2020/5421632. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32047671 (View on PubMed)

Terrault N, Chen YC, Izumi N, Kayali Z, Mitrut P, Tak WY, Allen LF, Hassanein T. Avatrombopag Before Procedures Reduces Need for Platelet Transfusion in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease and Thrombocytopenia. Gastroenterology. 2018 Sep;155(3):705-718. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.025. Epub 2018 May 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29778606 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-000934-36

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

E5501-G000-311

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.