Treatment of Thrombocytopenia in Patients With Chronic Liver DiseaseUndergoing an Elective Procedure

NCT ID: NCT01972529

Last Updated: 2018-02-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

231 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2017-02-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study using avatrombopag to treat adults with thrombocytopenia associated with liver disease. The study will evaluate avatrombopag in the treatment of thrombocytopenia associated with liver disease prior to an elective procedure to reduce the need for platelet transfusions or any rescue procedure for bleeding due to procedural and post-procedural bleeding complications. Participants will be enrolled into 2 cohorts according to mean baseline platelet count and, within each baseline platelet count cohort will be further stratified by risk of bleeding associated with the elective procedure (low, moderate, or high) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) status (Yes or No).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study will consist of 3 phases: Prerandomization, Randomization, and a Follow-up Phase. The Prerandomization Phase includes one Screening Visit that will take place from Day -14 through Day -1; the Randomization Phase includes the Baseline Period, Treatment Period, and Procedure Day Period (5 to 8 days after last dose of study drug \[Study Day 10 to 13\]). The Follow-up Phase comprises 2 visits: 7 days post Procedure Day and 30 days after receiving the last dose of study drug. Permitted procedures include: Paracentesis; Thoracentesis; Gastrointestinal endoscopy with or without plans for biopsy, colonoscopy, polypectomy, or variceal banding; Liver biopsy; Bronchoscopy with or without plans for biopsy; Ethanol ablation therapy or chemoembolization for HCC; Vascular catheterization (including right side procedures in participants with pulmonary hypertension); Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; Dental procedures; Renal biopsy; Biliary interventions; Nephrostomy tube placement; Radiofrequency ablation; and Laparoscopic interventions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thrombocytopenia Associated With Liver Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A (avatrombopag, lower baseline platelet count)

60 mg avatrombopag (3 x 20 mg tablets) once daily on Days 1 through 5

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

avatrombopag (lower baseline platelet count)

Intervention Type DRUG

60 mg avatrombopag (3 x 20 mg tablets)

Group B (placebo, lower baseline platelet count)

placebo (3 x 20 mg matching placebo tablets) once daily on Days 1 through 5

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo (lower baseline platelet count)

Intervention Type DRUG

60 mg placebo (3 x 20 mg matching placebo tablets)

Group C (avatrombopag, higher baseline platelet count)

40 mg avatrombopag (2 x 20 mg tablets) once daily on Days 1 through 5

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

avatrombopag (higher baseline platelet count)

Intervention Type DRUG

40 mg avatrombopag (2 x 20 mg tablets)

Group D (placebo, higher baseline platelet count)

placebo (2 x 20 mg matching placebo tablets) once daily on Days 1 through 5

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo (higher baseline platelet count)

Intervention Type DRUG

40 mg placebo (2 x 20 mg matching placebo tablets)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

avatrombopag (lower baseline platelet count)

60 mg avatrombopag (3 x 20 mg tablets)

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo (lower baseline platelet count)

60 mg placebo (3 x 20 mg matching placebo tablets)

Intervention Type DRUG

avatrombopag (higher baseline platelet count)

40 mg avatrombopag (2 x 20 mg tablets)

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo (higher baseline platelet count)

40 mg placebo (2 x 20 mg matching placebo tablets)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Participants greater than or equal to 18 years of age at Screening with chronic liver disease
2. Participants who have a mean baseline platelet count of less than 50 x 10\^9/L. Platelet counts must be measured on 2 separate occasions, during the Screening Period and at Baseline, and must be performed at least one day apart with neither platelet count greater than 60 x 10\^9/L. The mean of these 2 platelet counts (mean baseline platelet count) will be used for entry criteria and for assignment to the low or high baseline platelet count cohort.
3. Participants scheduled to undergo a permitted elective procedure who, in the opinion of the investigator, will require a platelet transfusion to address a risk of bleeding associated with the procedure unless there is a clinically significant increase in platelet count from baseline
4. Model For End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score less than or equal to 24 at Screening
5. If taking inhibitors of P glycoprotein (P-gp), except for verapamil, dose must be stable for 7 days prior to Screening
6. Provide written informed consent
7. Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol

Exclusion Criteria

1. Any history of arterial or venous thrombosis, including partial or complete thrombosis
2. Evidence of thrombosis (partial or complete) in the main portal vein, portal vein branches, or any part of the splenic mesenteric system at Screening
3. Portal vein blood flow velocity rate \<10 centimeters/second at Screening
4. Hepatic encephalopathy that cannot be effectively treated
5. Participants with HCC with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging classification C or D
6. Platelet transfusion or receipt of blood products containing platelets within 7 days of Screening. However packed red blood cells are permitted.
7. Heparin, warfarin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), aspirin, verapamil, and antiplatelet therapy with ticlopidine or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists (eg, tirofiban) within 7 days of Screening
8. Use of erythropoietin stimulating agents within 7 days of Screening
9. Interferon (IFN) use within 14 days of Screening
10. Estrogen-containing hormonal contraceptive or hormone replacement therapy use within 30 days of Screening
11. Active infection requiring systemic antibiotic therapy within 7 days of Screening. However, prophylactic use of antibiotics is permitted.
12. Alcohol abuse, alcohol dependence syndrome, drug abuse, or drug dependence within 6 months of the study start (unless participating in a controlled rehabilitation program) or acute alcoholic hepatitis (chronic alcoholic hepatitis is allowed) within 6 months of the study start
13. Elective procedure performed prior to Visit 4 (Procedure Day)
14. Known to be human immunodeficiency virus positive
15. Any clinically significant acute or active bleeding (eg, gastrointestinal, central nervous system)
16. Known history of any primary hematologic disorder (eg, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, myelodysplastic syndrome)
17. Known medical history of genetic prothrombotic syndromes (eg, Factor V Leiden; prothrombin G20210A; ATIII deficiency, etc.)
18. Participants with a history of significant cardiovascular disease (eg, congestive heart failure New York Heart Association Grade III/IV, arrhythmia known to increase the risk of thromboembolic events \[eg, atrial fibrillation\], coronary artery stent placement, angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass grafting)
19. Females of childbearing potential who have had unprotected sexual intercourse within 30 days before study entry and who do not agree to use a highly effective method of contraception (eg, total abstinence, an intrauterine device, a double-barrier method \[such as condom plus diaphragm with spermicide\], a progesterone-only contraceptive implant/injection, or have a vasectomized partner with confirmed azoospermia) throughout the entire study period and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation. If currently abstinent, the participant must agree to use a double-barrier method as described above if she becomes sexually active during the study period or for 30 days after study drug discontinuation. All females will be considered to be of childbearing potential unless they are postmenopausal (at least 12 months consecutive amenorrhea in the appropriate age group and without other known or suspected cause) or have been sterilized surgically (ie, bilateral tubal ligation, hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy) at least 1 month before dosing.
20. Females who are lactating or pregnant at Screening or Baseline (as documented by a positive serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin \[B-hCG\] test with a minimum sensitivity 25 IU/L or equivalent units of B-hCG). A separate baseline assessment is required if a negative screening pregnancy test was obtained more than 72 hours before the first dose of study drug.
21. Post liver transplant participants
22. Any participant who has previously received avatrombopag
23. Hypersensitivity to avatrombopag maleate or any of its excipients
24. Hemoglobin levels ≤ 8.0 or ≥ 18.0 g/dL for men and \> 15 for women at Screening, with hematocrit ≥ 54% for men and ≥ 45% for women
25. Current malignancy including solid tumors and hematologic malignancies (except HCC)
26. Any history of concomitant medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator(s), would compromise the participant's ability to safely complete the study
27. Currently enrolled in another clinical trial with any investigational drug or device within 30 days of Screening
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eisai Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lancaster, California, United States

Site Status

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Bernardino, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Palmetto Bay, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Rochester, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Harlingen, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Mendoza, , Argentina

Site Status

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

La Serena, , Chile

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Changsha, Hu'nan, China

Site Status

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Strasbourg, Bas Rhin, France

Site Status

Grenoble, Isere, France

Site Status

Reims, Marne, France

Site Status

Clermont-Ferrand, Puy De Dome, France

Site Status

Amiens, Somme, France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Herne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Békéscsaba, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Dunaújváros, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Kaposvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Kecskemét, , Hungary

Site Status

Szombathely, , Hungary

Site Status

Zalaegerszeg, , Hungary

Site Status

San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy

Site Status

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Modena, , Italy

Site Status

Palermo, , Italy

Site Status

Udine, , Italy

Site Status

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Mysłowice, , Poland

Site Status

Szczecin, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Viana do Castelo, , Portugal

Site Status

Vila Real, , Portugal

Site Status

Viseu, , Portugal

Site Status

Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, South Korea

Site Status

Guri-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea

Site Status

Hwasun, Jeollanam-do, South Korea

Site Status

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Pontevedra, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Valladolid, , Spain

Site Status

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taoyuan, , Taiwan

Site Status

Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, Thailand

Site Status

Ratchathewi, Bangkok, Thailand

Site Status

Khlong Luang, Changwat Pathum Thani, Thailand

Site Status

Mueang Nonthaburi, Chiang Mai, Thailand

Site Status

Truro, Cornwall, United Kingdom

Site Status

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom

Site Status

Wolverhampton, West Midlands, United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Chile China France Germany Hungary Italy Poland Portugal South Korea Spain Taiwan Thailand United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Poordad F, Terrault NA, Alkhouri N, Tian W, Allen LF, Rabinovitz M. Avatrombopag, an Alternate Treatment Option to Reduce Platelet Transfusions in Patients with Thrombocytopenia and Chronic Liver Disease-Integrated Analyses of 2 Phase 3 Studies. Int J Hepatol. 2020 Jan 25;2020:5421632. doi: 10.1155/2020/5421632. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32047671 (View on PubMed)

Terrault N, Chen YC, Izumi N, Kayali Z, Mitrut P, Tak WY, Allen LF, Hassanein T. Avatrombopag Before Procedures Reduces Need for Platelet Transfusion in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease and Thrombocytopenia. Gastroenterology. 2018 Sep;155(3):705-718. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.025. Epub 2018 May 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29778606 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-000965-34

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

E5501-G000-310

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.