The Norwegian Sonothrombolysis in Acute Stroke Study Part 2

NCT ID: NCT01949961

Last Updated: 2020-04-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

59 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

BACKGROUND: Thrombolytic drugs may dissolve blood vessel clots in acute ischemic stroke. The overall benefit of intravenous thrombolysis is substantial, but up to 2/3 of patients with large clots may not achieve re-opening of the vessel and up to 40% of the patients may remain severely disabled or die. Ultrasound accelerates clot break-up (lysis) when combined with thrombolysis (sonothrombolysis) and increases the likelihood of functional independence at 3 months. Adding intravenous ultrasound contrast (gaseous microspheres) further enhances the thrombolytic effect (contrast enhanced sonothrombolysis = CEST). Contrast enhanced ultrasound may also accelerate clot break-up in the absence of thrombolytic drugs (contrast enhanced sonolysis = CES).

HYPOTHESIS: Contrast enhanced ultrasound treatment administered within 4 1/2 hours after symptom onset may be given safely to patients with acute ischemic stroke, both to those receiving intravenous thrombolysis and those not receiving intravenous thrombolysis, and will improve clinical outcome.

AIMS: To compare efficacy and safety of contrast enhanced ultrasound treatment vs. no ultrasound treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving or not receiving intravenous thrombolysis.

STUDY ENDPOINTS: The primary endpoints are 1) neurological improvement at 24 hours (proof of concept) and 2) excellent clinical outcome at 3 months (effect). Secondary endpoints are bleeding complications (safety), brain damage (infarct size/location) and early clinical improvement (effect).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

NOR-SASS aims at testing contrast enhanced sonothrombolysis in all patients with acute ischemic stroke. Patients eligible for thrombolysis (randomized tenecteplase or alteplase) are included in the NOR-SASS A sub-study, patients receiving standard (non-trial) thrombolysis with alteplase are included in the NOR-SASS B sub-study, and patients not eligible for thrombolysis are included in the NOR-SASS C sub-study.

DESIGN: NOR-SASS is a PROBE (prospective randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint) trial, designed to establish the superiority of contrast-enhanced ultrasound treatment given within 4½ hours after stroke onset in consecutively admitted patients with acute ischaemic stroke, as compared with 1) standard iv thrombolysis with tenecteplase (TNK) or alteplase (tPA) in patients eligible for thrombolytic treatment, and 2) no specific treatment in patients not eligible for thrombolytic treatment.

HYPOTHESIS: 1.) In patients eligible for intravenous thrombolysis, contrast enhanced sonothrombolysis (CEST) has superior effect as compared with standard intravenous thrombolysis and may be given safely. 2.) In patients not eligible for thrombolysis, contrast enhanced sonolysis (CES) has superior effect as compared with no specific treatment and may be given safely.

RANDOMISATION: In NOR-SASS-A (two step randomisation), 1st randomisation is 1:1 to either tenecteplase (TNK) or alteplase (tPA); 2nd randomisation is 1:1 to either CEST or no CEST. In NOR-SASS-B, randomisation is 1:1 to either CEST or no CEST. In NOR-SASS-C, randomisation is 1:1 to either CES or no CES.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ischemic Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

PROBE: Prospective randomized open-label blinded-endpoint
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ultrasound

Patients eligible (NOR-SASS A/B) and ineligible (NOR-SASS C) for intravenous thrombolysis all receive intravenous ultrasound contrast (microbubbles). The groups are separately randomised to 2 megahertz (MHz) transcranial ultrasound treatment for one hour.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ultrasound

Intervention Type OTHER

SonoVue solution 10 ml (2 vials / 80 µl microbubbles) is given as an infusion of 0,3 ml/min for \~30 minutes, using a Bracco infusion pump.

Sham ultrasound

Patients eligible (NOR-SASS A/B) and ineligible (NOR-SASS C) for intravenous thrombolysis all receive intravenous ultrasound contrast (microbubbles). The two groups are separately randomised to sham ultrasound treatment for one hour.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Sham ultrasound

Intervention Type OTHER

Mounting the ultrasound headframe but connecting this to a non-operative channel

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound

SonoVue solution 10 ml (2 vials / 80 µl microbubbles) is given as an infusion of 0,3 ml/min for \~30 minutes, using a Bracco infusion pump.

Intervention Type OTHER

Sham ultrasound

Mounting the ultrasound headframe but connecting this to a non-operative channel

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation
* Treatment within 4.5 hours after stroke onset
* Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥3;
* Patients for whom a complete NIH Stroke Score cannot be obtained;
* Hemiplegic migraine with no arterial occlusion on baseline CT;
* Seizure at stroke onset and no visible occlusion on baseline CT;
* Intracranial haemorrhage on baseline CT;
* Clinical subarachnoid haemorrhage even if baseline CT is normal;
* Large areas of hypodense ischaemic changes on baseline CT;
* Patients with primary endovascular treatment;
* Female, pregnant or breast feeding; pericarditis; sepsis; any other serious medical illness likely to interact with treatment; confounding pre-existent neurological or psychiatric disease; unlikely to complete follow-up; any investigational drug \<14 days;
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Bergen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sykehuset Telemark

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Haukeland University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lars Thomassen, MD PhD Prof.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Dept. Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

Christopher E Kvistad, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Dept. Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

Haakon Tobro, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dept. Neurology, Sykehuset Telemark, Skien

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dept. of Neurology, Telemark Hospital

Skien, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nacu A, Kvistad CE, Logallo N, Naess H, Waje-Andreassen U, Aamodt AH, Solhoff R, Lund C, Tobro H, Ronning OM, Salvesen R, Idicula TT, Thomassen L. A pragmatic approach to sonothrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: the Norwegian randomised controlled sonothrombolysis in acute stroke study (NOR-SASS). BMC Neurol. 2015 Jul 11;15:110. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0359-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26162826 (View on PubMed)

Nacu A, Kvistad CE, Naess H, Oygarden H, Logallo N, Assmus J, Waje-Andreassen U, Kurz KD, Neckelmann G, Thomassen L. NOR-SASS (Norwegian Sonothrombolysis in Acute Stroke Study): Randomized Controlled Contrast-Enhanced Sonothrombolysis in an Unselected Acute Ischemic Stroke Population. Stroke. 2017 Feb;48(2):335-341. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014644. Epub 2016 Dec 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27980128 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012-000323-41

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

REK 2011/2448

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.