A Prospective, Randomized Trial of BVS Veruss EES in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stenting for Myocardial Infarction
NCT ID: NCT01942070
Last Updated: 2018-07-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
262 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-09-30
2019-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Test Efficacy With Bioresorbable Polymer Coating Versus Bioresorbable Polymer Backbone (ISAR-RESORB)
NCT02421016
A Randomized Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Everolimus-eluting Metallic Stent in Long Coronary Lesions
NCT02796157
Everolimus- Versus Biolimus-Eluting Stents in All-Comers
NCT01472705
Everolimus Stent in Myocardial Infarction
NCT01684982
Comparison of Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Stents With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Stents
NCT01711931
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) represent an innovative technology providing short-term vessel scaffolding and drug delivery without the long-term limitations of metallic DES and durable polymer coatings. Potential benefits include restoration of normal vasomotor reactivity, facilitation of positive vessel wall remodelling and facilitation of subsequent bypass grafting of the stented arterial segment. In addition preliminary reports suggest that the process of scaffold biodegradation may promote formation of a cohesive tissue layer covering and stabilizing the underlying atherosclerotic plaque - a so-called plaque-sealing effect. Although initial results with BVS are encouraging, there is a lack of randomized clinical trial data and no data exists for outcomes after BVS implantation in patients undergoing coronary stenting in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (MI).
The aim of the current study is to test the clinical performance of the everolimus-eluting BVS compared with that of the durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in patients undergoing PCI in the setting of acute MI. The primary endpoint will be percentage diameter stenosis at protocol-mandated 6-8 month angiographic follow-up. Sample size calculation is based on a non-inferiority assumption in relation to the BVS versus EES. It is planned to enrol a total of 260 patients. Subsequent clinical follow-up will be undertaken out to 2 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS)
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold
Everolimus-eluting stent
Durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent (EES)
Durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold
Durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Planned stent implantation in de novo lesions in native vessels or coronary bypass grafts with reference vessel diameter ≥2.5 mm and ≤3.9 mm
3. Written, informed consent by the patient or her/his legally-authorized representative for participation in the study
4. In women with childbearing potential a negative pregnancy test is mandatory
Exclusion Criteria
2. Severely calcified lesions
3. Bifurcation lesions with side branch diameter \> 2mm
4. In-stent restenosis
5. Contraindications to antiplatelet therapy, cobalt chrome, everolimus, polylactic acid
6. Malignancies or other comorbid conditions (for example severe liver, renal and pancreatic disease) with life expectancy less than 12 months or that may result in protocol non-compliance
7. Pregnancy (present, suspected or planned) or positive pregnancy test.
8. Previous enrolment in this trial
9. Patient's inability to fully cooperate with the study protocol
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert A Byrne, MB PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
Klinikum Rechts der Isar
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cassese S, Katagiri Y, Byrne RA, Brugaletta S, Alfonso F, Raber L, Maeng M, Iniguez A, Kretov E, Onuma Y, Joner M, Sabate M, Laugwitz KL, Windecker S, Kastrati A, Serruys PW. Angiographic and clinical outcomes of STEMI patients treated with bioresorbable or metallic everolimus-eluting stents: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. EuroIntervention. 2020 Mar 20;15(16):1451-1457. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01080.
Byrne RA, Alfonso F, Schneider S, Maeng M, Wiebe J, Kretov E, Bradaric C, Rai H, Cuesta J, Rivero F, Hoppmann P, Schlichtenmaier J, Christiansen EH, Cassese S, Joner M, Schunkert H, Laugwitz KL, Kastrati A. Prospective, randomized trial of bioresorbable scaffolds vs. everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary stenting for myocardial infarction: the Intracoronary Scaffold Assessment a Randomized evaluation of Absorb in Myocardial Infarction (ISAR-Absorb MI) trial. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):167-176. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy710.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Ge IDE No. I01210
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.