Evaluation of Pain and Inflammation After Injection of Lucentis vs Eylea for Treatment of Wet Macular Degeneration

NCT ID: NCT01926977

Last Updated: 2016-03-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is designed to compare the post injection inflammation and pain seen after intravitreal injections of Ranibizumab vs Aflibercept.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is an open-label, Phase I-II study of post injection pain and inflammation after intravitreally administered Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in 100 subjects with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. We will enroll both treatment experienced ( patients who were treated with Lucentis or Eylea, but not Avastin in the past) and treatment naive patients ( new onset Neovascular AMD with no history of intravitreal injections).

The treatment experienced patients will be treated with the intravitreal medication other than what they were receiving in the past, for example, patients treated with Lucentis will switch to Eylea for study purposes and vice versa.

Consented, enrolled subjects will receive open-label intravitreal injection of either 0.5mg Ranibizumab or 2mg Aflibercept. A standard intravitreal injection protocol will be followed. Patients will be reevaluated between 24-48 hours and 5-7 days post injections. A non-injecting physician will evaluate the patients for anterior chamber inflammation; this physician will be blinded about the specific treatment. Anterior chamber inflammation is described as any cell or flare in the anterior chamber. These will be evaluated using Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) working group classifications.

Pain score will be evaluated using a Numerical Rating Scale. Each patient will have a standard script verbally read to them at their visit, and asked to rate their pain based on this scale.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ranibizumab 0.5mg Intravitreal injection

Intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab 0.5mg once

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ranibizumab 0.5mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Patient will receive intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab 0.5mg.

Aflibercept 2.0mg Intravitreal injection

Intravitreal Aflibercept 2.0mg once

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Aflibercept 2.0mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will receive intravitreal injection of Aflibercept 2.0mg.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ranibizumab 0.5mg

Patient will receive intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab 0.5mg.

Intervention Type DRUG

Aflibercept 2.0mg

Patients will receive intravitreal injection of Aflibercept 2.0mg.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lucentis Eylea

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Able to provide informed consent and comply with study assessments for the full duration of the study
2. Age \>/= 65 years
3. New onset Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration or (See No.4)
4. Previously treated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Lucentis or Eylea intravitreal injections
5. Visual Acuity of 20/400 or better
6. No history of Post injection pain or inflammation with prior treatments -

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of Endophthalmitis in either eye
2. Uncontrolled or symptomatic Dry Eye Syndrome
3. History of Anterior or Posterior Uveitis
4. History of Post injection pain or inflammation with prior treatments
5. Recent thromboembolic event(\<3 months)
6. Pregnancy(positive pregnancy test) or Lactation/Premenopausal women not using adequate contraception -
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Genentech, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Arshad Khanani

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Arshad Khanani

Vitreo-Retinal Surgeon

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Arshad M Khanani, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sierra Eye Associates

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sierra Eye Associates

Reno, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20131227

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ML28895

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.