Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Blockade of Voltage Gated Sodium Channels During Surgery in Operable Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01916317
Last Updated: 2025-04-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE3
1600 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-12-12
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Expression of VGSCs has been reported both in vitro and/or in vivo in a range of human carcinomas, including breast cancer Ion channels are major signaling molecules expressed in a wide variety of tissues. They are involved in determining a variety of cellular functions like proliferation, solute transport, volume control, enzyme activity, secretion, invasion, gene-expression, excitation-contraction coupling, and intercellular communication.4 VGSC activity contributes to much cellular behavior integral to metastasis, including cellular process extension, lateral motility and galvanotaxis, transverse invasion, and secretory membrane activity.
A correlation between Na transport and oncogenesis has been widely reported in literature. In 1980, transformed mouse mammary cells were shown to have 3-fold higher intra-cellular sodium content than untransformed cells.5 Additionally evidence suggest that increasing the inward sodium current through voltage gated sodium channels increased the invasive capacity of breast cancer.6 Also, growth and proliferation of mammary adenocarcinoma cells can be inhibited by Amiloride suggesting that epithelial Na channels (ENaC) activity is correlated with proliferation of breast cancer cells
Current evidence suggests that VGSC activity is necessary and sufficient for cancer cell invasiveness8. A recent in vitro study has shown that the human MDA MB 231 breast cancer cell line expressed functional VGSCs9. However, the molecular nature of the VGSC and its functional relevance to breast cancer in vivo are currently under study.
Surgical operations for cancer have been reported to induce dissemination of cancer cells into surrounding tissues or into the circulation10,11and infiltration anesthetics can inhibit immune response12-14. Although the mechanism remains to be elucidated, infiltration anesthetics such as lidocaine have membrane- stabilizing action (Seeman, 1972) and these agents could have direct effects on cancer cells. Therefore, it is important to clarify the effects of infiltration anesthetics on behavior of the tumor cells.
Commonly used local anesthetic agents inhibit the VGSCs and also possess a unique membrane stabilizing action through other unknown mechanisms. A study by Mammota et al 15 reported that lignocaine, effectively inhibited the invasive ability of human cancer (HT1080, HOS, and RPMI-7951) cells at concentrations used in surgical operations (5-20 mM). Lidocaine reduced the invasion ability of these cells by partly inhibiting the shedding of HB-EGF from the cell surface and modulation of intracellular Ca2+ concentration contributed to this action. In addition, lidocaine (5-30 mM) infiltrated around the inoculation site, inhibited pulmonary metastases of murine osteosarcoma (LM 8) cells in vivo.
Dose of lidocaine15:
40 mM (1%) lidocaine is usually used for infiltration anesthesia for surgical operations. Lower concentrations (1-20mM) of lidocaine were sufficient to suppress the invasive ability of cancer cells14. One mM lidocaine inhibited the invasive ability of HT1080 cells by about 50%, and 20 mM lidocaine inhibited the invasion ability completely. Lidocaine also inhibited dose-dependently the invasive ability of HOS and RPMI-7951 cells, although it was less effective on HOS cells. Lignocaine exerts its anesthetic action by obstructing the sodium channel 16 however, 10 mMof tetrodotoxin (TTX), a specific sodium channel inhibitor, had little effect on the invasive ability of HT1080 cells. Ten mM lidocaine-N-ethylbromide (NEB), which does not cross the cell membrane, also had little effect on the invasive ability of the cells.
Objectives
Primary Objective:
• To assess the in-vivo ability of local anesthetics agents like lignocaine to decrease the dissemination of cancer cells during surgery and improve the disease free interval
Secondary Objective
• To assess the in-vivo ability of local anesthetics agents like lignocaine on impacting long term survival.
Methodology / Treatment plan
The study drug (0.5% lidocaine 60mM) will be tested in the intraoperative setting prior to surgery will be tested in a randomized setting.:
Arm A: 60mM of 0.5% lignocaine will be injected peritumoral prior to excision. The local anesthetic should be injected on all 6 surfaces of the tumor and also within the tumor. Wait for 7 minutes for its action followed by surgery. (Intervention arm) Arm B: No injection of lignocaine prior to excision (Control arm)
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Impact of Nitrous Oxide on PONV in Breast Surgeries
NCT02736604
The Effect of Glycyrrhizin on the Occurrence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
NCT04742660
Effectiveness of Deep Versus Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade
NCT03266419
The Laparotomy Study
NCT02140593
Different Anesthetic Technique For ERCP
NCT04087668
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm B:Control
: No peritumoral Local Anesthesia prior to excision
No interventions assigned to this group
Arm A: Intervention
Arm A: 60mM of 0.5% Inj. Lignocaine will be injected peri tumoral prior to excision.
0.5% lignocaine 60mM
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
0.5% lignocaine 60mM
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Histologically proven or clinically suspicious breast cancer
Exclusion Criteria
2. Distant metastases
3. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
4. History of allergy to drugs (lignocaine)
5. High risk factors precluding the use of lignocaine
6. Previous history of cancer
18 Years
99 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shri Siddhivinayak Ganpati Cancer Hospital
UNKNOWN
Kolhapur Cancer Centre (KCC)
UNKNOWN
Max Super Speciality Hospital
OTHER
Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital & Research Institute
OTHER
Malabar Cancer Centre (MCC)
UNKNOWN
North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS)
UNKNOWN
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
OTHER
Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute
OTHER
Sterling Multi Speciality Hospital (SMSH)
UNKNOWN
Dr. B Barooha Cancer Institute (BBCI)
UNKNOWN
Tata Memorial Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr Rajendra A. Badwe
Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rajendra A Badwe, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Director and professor, Surgical Oncology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dr. B Barooha Cancer Institute
Guwahati, Assam, India
Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute (GCRI)
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
Malabar Cancer Centre
Kannur, Kerala, India
Kolhapur Cancer Centre PVT LTD
Kolhāpur, Maharashtra, India
Tata Memorial Centre Mumbai
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Sterling Multi Speciality Hospital
Pune, Maharashtra, India
Shree Siddhivinayak Ganapti Cancer Hospital Sangli
Sangli, Maharashtra, India
North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health & Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS)
Shillong, Meghālaya, India
All India Institute of Medical Science
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India
Basavatarakam Indo- American Cancer Hospital
Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Max Super Speciality Hospital
Delhi, , India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Badwe RA, Parmar V, Nair N, Joshi S, Hawaldar R, Pawar S, Kadayaprath G, Borthakur BB, Rao Thammineedi S, Pandya S, Balasubramanian S, Chitale PV, Neve R, Harris C, Srivastava A, Siddique S, Vanmali VJ, Dewade A, Gaikwad V, Gupta S. Effect of Peritumoral Infiltration of Local Anesthetic Before Surgery on Survival in Early Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jun 20;41(18):3318-3328. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01966. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TMH project 902
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.