Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Blockade of Voltage Gated Sodium Channels During Surgery in Operable Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01916317

Last Updated: 2025-04-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-12-12

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Voltage Gated Sodium Channels Over the years, there is more evidence that ionic channels are involved in the oncogenic process. Among these, voltage gated sodium channels (VGSC) expressed in non-nervous or non-muscular organs are often associated with the metastatic behavior of different cancers.

Expression of VGSCs has been reported both in vitro and/or in vivo in a range of human carcinomas, including breast cancer Ion channels are major signaling molecules expressed in a wide variety of tissues. They are involved in determining a variety of cellular functions like proliferation, solute transport, volume control, enzyme activity, secretion, invasion, gene-expression, excitation-contraction coupling, and intercellular communication.4 VGSC activity contributes to much cellular behavior integral to metastasis, including cellular process extension, lateral motility and galvanotaxis, transverse invasion, and secretory membrane activity.

A correlation between Na transport and oncogenesis has been widely reported in literature. In 1980, transformed mouse mammary cells were shown to have 3-fold higher intra-cellular sodium content than untransformed cells.5 Additionally evidence suggest that increasing the inward sodium current through voltage gated sodium channels increased the invasive capacity of breast cancer.6 Also, growth and proliferation of mammary adenocarcinoma cells can be inhibited by Amiloride suggesting that epithelial Na channels (ENaC) activity is correlated with proliferation of breast cancer cells

Current evidence suggests that VGSC activity is necessary and sufficient for cancer cell invasiveness8. A recent in vitro study has shown that the human MDA MB 231 breast cancer cell line expressed functional VGSCs9. However, the molecular nature of the VGSC and its functional relevance to breast cancer in vivo are currently under study.

Surgical operations for cancer have been reported to induce dissemination of cancer cells into surrounding tissues or into the circulation10,11and infiltration anesthetics can inhibit immune response12-14. Although the mechanism remains to be elucidated, infiltration anesthetics such as lidocaine have membrane- stabilizing action (Seeman, 1972) and these agents could have direct effects on cancer cells. Therefore, it is important to clarify the effects of infiltration anesthetics on behavior of the tumor cells.

Commonly used local anesthetic agents inhibit the VGSCs and also possess a unique membrane stabilizing action through other unknown mechanisms. A study by Mammota et al 15 reported that lignocaine, effectively inhibited the invasive ability of human cancer (HT1080, HOS, and RPMI-7951) cells at concentrations used in surgical operations (5-20 mM). Lidocaine reduced the invasion ability of these cells by partly inhibiting the shedding of HB-EGF from the cell surface and modulation of intracellular Ca2+ concentration contributed to this action. In addition, lidocaine (5-30 mM) infiltrated around the inoculation site, inhibited pulmonary metastases of murine osteosarcoma (LM 8) cells in vivo.

Dose of lidocaine15:

40 mM (1%) lidocaine is usually used for infiltration anesthesia for surgical operations. Lower concentrations (1-20mM) of lidocaine were sufficient to suppress the invasive ability of cancer cells14. One mM lidocaine inhibited the invasive ability of HT1080 cells by about 50%, and 20 mM lidocaine inhibited the invasion ability completely. Lidocaine also inhibited dose-dependently the invasive ability of HOS and RPMI-7951 cells, although it was less effective on HOS cells. Lignocaine exerts its anesthetic action by obstructing the sodium channel 16 however, 10 mMof tetrodotoxin (TTX), a specific sodium channel inhibitor, had little effect on the invasive ability of HT1080 cells. Ten mM lidocaine-N-ethylbromide (NEB), which does not cross the cell membrane, also had little effect on the invasive ability of the cells.

Objectives

Primary Objective:

• To assess the in-vivo ability of local anesthetics agents like lignocaine to decrease the dissemination of cancer cells during surgery and improve the disease free interval

Secondary Objective

• To assess the in-vivo ability of local anesthetics agents like lignocaine on impacting long term survival.

Methodology / Treatment plan

The study drug (0.5% lidocaine 60mM) will be tested in the intraoperative setting prior to surgery will be tested in a randomized setting.:

Arm A: 60mM of 0.5% lignocaine will be injected peritumoral prior to excision. The local anesthetic should be injected on all 6 surfaces of the tumor and also within the tumor. Wait for 7 minutes for its action followed by surgery. (Intervention arm) Arm B: No injection of lignocaine prior to excision (Control arm)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Operable Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm B:Control

: No peritumoral Local Anesthesia prior to excision

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Arm A: Intervention

Arm A: 60mM of 0.5% Inj. Lignocaine will be injected peri tumoral prior to excision.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

0.5% lignocaine 60mM

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

0.5% lignocaine 60mM

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. All women with operable breast cancer planned for upfront surgery
2. Histologically proven or clinically suspicious breast cancer

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous history of lumpectomy or incision biopsy
2. Distant metastases
3. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
4. History of allergy to drugs (lignocaine)
5. High risk factors precluding the use of lignocaine
6. Previous history of cancer
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shri Siddhivinayak Ganpati Cancer Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kolhapur Cancer Centre (KCC)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Max Super Speciality Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital & Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Malabar Cancer Centre (MCC)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

All India Institute of Medical Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sterling Multi Speciality Hospital (SMSH)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr. B Barooha Cancer Institute (BBCI)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tata Memorial Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Rajendra A. Badwe

Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rajendra A Badwe, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Director and professor, Surgical Oncology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dr. B Barooha Cancer Institute

Guwahati, Assam, India

Site Status

Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute (GCRI)

Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Site Status

Malabar Cancer Centre

Kannur, Kerala, India

Site Status

Kolhapur Cancer Centre PVT LTD

Kolhāpur, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Tata Memorial Centre Mumbai

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Sterling Multi Speciality Hospital

Pune, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Shree Siddhivinayak Ganapti Cancer Hospital Sangli

Sangli, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health & Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS)

Shillong, Meghālaya, India

Site Status

All India Institute of Medical Science

New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India

Site Status

Basavatarakam Indo- American Cancer Hospital

Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Site Status

Max Super Speciality Hospital

Delhi, , India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Badwe RA, Parmar V, Nair N, Joshi S, Hawaldar R, Pawar S, Kadayaprath G, Borthakur BB, Rao Thammineedi S, Pandya S, Balasubramanian S, Chitale PV, Neve R, Harris C, Srivastava A, Siddique S, Vanmali VJ, Dewade A, Gaikwad V, Gupta S. Effect of Peritumoral Infiltration of Local Anesthetic Before Surgery on Survival in Early Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jun 20;41(18):3318-3328. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01966. Epub 2023 Apr 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37023374 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TMH project 902

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.