Impact of SpHb Monitoring on Transfusion

NCT ID: NCT01906515

Last Updated: 2014-02-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

106 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-29

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Continuous and noninvasive hemoglobin (SpHb) monitoring provides clinicians with real-time trending of changes or lack of changes in hemoglobin, which has the potential to alter red blood cell (RBC) transfusion decision making. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of SpHb monitoring on RBC transfusions in high blood loss surgery. The investigators hypothesize that SpHb will improve blood transfusion practice in the for of change the number of blood unit per patient and improve the outcome regards the time to take decision of transfusion trigger.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Eligible patients scheduled for neurosurgeries were enrolled into either a standard care group (Control Group) or an intervention group (SpHb Group). The Control Group received typical anesthesia care including estimated blood loss (EBL) assessment and intraoperative hemoglobin measurements from the central laboratory (Hb). Blood samples were taken when EBL was ≥15% of total blood volume. RBC transfusion was initiated if Hb was ≤10 g/dL and continued until the EBL was replaced and Hb \>10g/dL was confirmed. The SpHb Group followed the same transfusion practice as the Control Group except the anesthesiologist was guided by the addition of SpHb monitoring with blood samples still taken pre- and post-transfusion. Additionally, the absolute and trend accuracy of SpHb compared to Hb was evaluated. Potential cost savings from reduced RBC utilization will be calculated if occured.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Group

Control Group received standard anesthesia care including intraoperative blood sampling when estimated blood loss was ≥15% of total blood volume and transfusion when hemoglobin was ≤10 g/dL.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

SpHb Group.

Continuous non-invasive hemoglobin monitoring (SpHb monitoring) was provided to the anesthesiologist to influence administration of care

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Continuous non-invasive hemoglobin monitoring

Intervention Type DEVICE

Anesthesiologist is provided with real-time continuous non-invasive hemoglobin monitoring to influence care provided to patient

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Continuous non-invasive hemoglobin monitoring

Anesthesiologist is provided with real-time continuous non-invasive hemoglobin monitoring to influence care provided to patient

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Masimo Radical-7 with SpHb

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA 1,2 patients from 15 to 60 years old scheduled for neurosurgical procedure
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Masimo Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

wael awada

Assistant Lecturer Cairo University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wael N Awada, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Anesthesia, ICU, and Pain Management, Cairo University, Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

doctor19

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.