Efficacy of Symbiotic in the Reduction of Acute Radiation Proctitis Symptoms
NCT ID: NCT01901042
Last Updated: 2013-07-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-01-31
2012-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effects of Probiotics Combined With Glutamine in the Prevention and Treatment of Radiation Proctitis
NCT05406882
Probiotics In Colorectal Cancer Patients
NCT00936572
Effects of Probiotics Supplementation on Intestinal Microbiome in Malignancy Pts(Get Pelvic/Abdominal Rtx)
NCT01706393
Probiotic Supplementation During Cytotoxic Chemotherapy for Solid Tumor Malignancies
NCT06772090
Probiotic Therapy in Preventing Gastrointestinal Complications in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy and Pelvic Radiation Therapy
NCT01473290
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
EORTC QLQ-PRT23 questionnaire Each participant answered the questions of the EORTC QLQ-PRT23 questionnaire before the beginning of radiotherapy and immediately after the first, second, third and fourth weeks of treatment. The questions were always asked by an examiner blinded to the study design and type of treatment used. The EORTC QLQ-PRT23 questionnaire, originally developed in English, was translated into Portuguese following the protocol described at the EORTC Translation Procedure : The sum of points obtained by each patient through the first 21 questions of the EORTC QLQ-PRT23 was recorded. All these 21 questions received a number of points according to the intensity of each symptom or problem during the previous week, as follows: - "Not at all" = 1 point; "A little" = 2 points; "Quite a bit" = 3 points; and "Very much" = 4 points.
Radiotherapy protocol A total dose of 66-76 Gy during 6-8 weeks was programmed for each individual. Patients were followed-up until the fourth week of radiotherapy and the cumulative dose of radiation was compared weekly between the two groups. Each patient was scheduled to receive a dose of two grays (Gy) per day, from Monday to Friday with weekend interval, totaling 10 Gy per week and 40 Gy after the 4th week of treatment. The irradiated rectal volume after an accumulated dose of 40 Gy was compared between the two groups using dose-volume histograms and presented in percentages of the rectal volume which received 10 Gy (V10), 20 Gy (V20), 30 Gy (V30), and 40 Gy (V40).
Outcome variables The endpoints of the study were the intensity of the gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life. All patients were scored with the sum of questions from 1 to 21 to represent both gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life; and the sum of the scores obtained with questions numbered from 1 to 15, which refer only to gastrointestinal symptoms. Presence of blood in stools and tenesmus intensity were also assessed according to the score described above and used in the questionnaire. It was also recorded the maximum number of evacuations that each patient had over a period of 24 hours each week.
Statistical analysis For the calculation of the sample, it was estimated that the symbiotic group would present a median of four points lower than the score of the placebo group over four weeks. A total of twenty patients (10 in each group) was calculated considering an error alpha of 1% and a beta error of 90%. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 9.0 was used for statistical analysis. A level of 5% (p \<0,05) was established for significance. Fischer's test or chi-square test was used for categorical variables. For continuous data, we used the Mann-Whitney or Student's t according to the homogeneity (Levene test) and normality (Kolgomorov-Smirnov test) data. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the responses obtained by the EORTC QLQ-PRT23 questionnaire.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Symbiotic
Patients in this group received sachets with a symbiotic product in powder form containing 4.3 g of dietary fiber and Lactobacillus reuteri in a concentration greater than 1.0 x 108 colony forming units (CFU), with five grams per sachet (Fibermais Flora Nestlé Brazil).
Symbiotic
Sachets with a symbiotic product in powder form containing 4.3 g of dietary fiber and Lactobacillus reuteri in a concentration greater than 1.0 x 108 colony forming units (CFU), with five grams per sachet (Fibermais Flora Nestlé Brazil).
Maltodextrin
patients in this group received sachets five grams of maltodextrin per sachet with identical casing and identical aspect to the product of the other arm group, and were instructed to proceed in the same way as those of the symbiotic group
Maltodextrin
Control patients will receive sachets containing maltodextrin
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Symbiotic
Sachets with a symbiotic product in powder form containing 4.3 g of dietary fiber and Lactobacillus reuteri in a concentration greater than 1.0 x 108 colony forming units (CFU), with five grams per sachet (Fibermais Flora Nestlé Brazil).
Maltodextrin
Control patients will receive sachets containing maltodextrin
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
50 Years
80 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Federal University of Mato Grosso
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jose Eduardo de Aguilar-Nascimento
MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
JOSE E AGUILAR-NASCIMENTO, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Federal University of Mato Grosso
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
marianan
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.