Study to Assess Safety and Impact of SelG1 With or Without Hydroxyurea Therapy in Sickle Cell Disease Patients With Pain Crises

NCT ID: NCT01895361

Last Updated: 2020-01-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

198 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-07-31

Study Completion Date

2016-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the investigational drug SelG1 when given to sickle cell disease patients either taking or not taking hydroxyurea was effective in preventing or reducing the occurrence of pain crises. SelG1 prevents various cells in the bloodstream from sticking together. By stopping these cell-cell interactions, SelG1 may prevent small blood vessels from becoming blocked and therefore reduce the occurrence and severity of pain crises. Other effects of SelG1 was evaluated, as well as the safety of the drug and how long it stayed in the blood stream.

Funding Source - FDA Office of Orphan Products Development (OOPD)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sickle Cell Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg)

IV Infusion, once every 4 weeks through Week 50

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SelG1

Intervention Type DRUG

Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg)

IV Infusion, once every 4 weeks through Week 50

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SelG1

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

IV Infusion, once every 4 weeks through Week 50

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SelG1

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Sickle Cell Disease (HbSS, HbSC, HbSβ⁰-thalassemia, or HbSβ⁺-thalassemia)
* If receiving hydroxyurea or erythropoietin, treatment must have been prescribed for at least 6 months, with the dose stable for at least 3 months
* Between 2 and 10 sickle cell-related pain crises in the past 12 months

Exclusion Criteria

* On a chronic transfusion program or planning on exchange transfusion during the study
* Hemoglobin \<4.0 g/dL
* Planned initiation, termination, or dose alteration of hydroxyurea during the study
* Receiving chronic anticoagulation therapy (e.g. warfarin, heparin) other than aspirin
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Reprixys Pharmaceutical Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

New Hyde Park, New York, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Sumter, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São José Do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Rio de Janeiro, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Kingston, , Jamaica

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Brazil Jamaica

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sy SKB, Tanaka C, Grosch K. Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Crizanlizumab in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Sickle Cell Disease. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 Feb;62(2):249-266. doi: 10.1007/s40262-022-01193-4. Epub 2022 Dec 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36529836 (View on PubMed)

Kanter J, Brown RC, Norris C, Nair SM, Kutlar A, Manwani D, Shah N, Tanaka C, Bodla S, Sanchez-Olle G, Albers U, Liles D. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of crizanlizumab in patients with sickle cell disease. Blood Adv. 2023 Mar 28;7(6):943-952. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008209.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36355805 (View on PubMed)

Ataga KI, Kutlar A, Kanter J, Liles D, Cancado R, Friedrisch J, Guthrie TH, Knight-Madden J, Alvarez OA, Gordeuk VR, Gualandro S, Colella MP, Smith WR, Rollins SA, Stocker JW, Rother RP. Crizanlizumab for the Prevention of Pain Crises in Sickle Cell Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 2;376(5):429-439. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611770. Epub 2016 Dec 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27959701 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R44HL093893

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

R01FD004805

Identifier Type: FDA

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

SelG1-00005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TRF-1101 Assessment in Sickle Cell Disease
NCT00773890 TERMINATED PHASE1/PHASE2