Study of Two Doses of Crizanlizumab Versus Placebo in Adolescent and Adult Sickle Cell Disease Patients

NCT ID: NCT03814746

Last Updated: 2026-01-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

255 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-26

Study Completion Date

2026-11-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of crizanlizumab (5.0 mg/kg and 7.5 mg/kg) versus placebo in adolescent and adult sickle cell disease (SCD) patients with history of vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) leading to healthcare visit.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study CSEG101A2301 (STAND) is an ongoing Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study to assess efficacy and safety of two doses of crizanlizumab (5 mg/kg and 7.5 mg/kg) versus placebo, with or without hydroxyurea/ hydroxycarbamide therapy (HU/HC), in adolescent and adult patients with SCD and history of VOC leading to healthcare visit.

This is a multicenter clinical trial comparing 2 doses of crizanlizumab (5 mg/kg and 7.5 mg/kg) versus placebo in addition to standard of care participants might be taking at the time of study start, in adolescent and adult participants with confirmed diagnosis of sickle cell disease (SCD) and history of vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) leading to a healthcare visit.

240 participants (including 48 adolescents) were planned to be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to either 5 mg/kg, 7.5 mg/kg of crizanlizumab or placebo. Randomized participants were stratified by concomitant HU/HC usage (yes/no) and baseline rate of VOCs leading to a healthcare visit in 12 months prior to screening visit (2-4 vs. ≥ 5 VOCs) at the time of enrollment. In November 2020, a capping of 90 adult participants per strata was implemented to ensure adequate opportunity for enrollment into each of the 4 strata.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Double-blind Study

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Crizanlizumab (SEG101) at 5.0 mg/kg

Participants received Crizanlizumab (SEG101) at 5.0 mg/kg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Crizanlizumab (SEG101)

Intervention Type DRUG

Crizanlizumab was supplied in single use 10 mL glass vials at a concentration of 10 mg/mL. One vial contains 100 mg of crizanlizumab. This is a concentrate for solution for infusion.

IV.

Crizanlizumab (SEG101) at 7.5 mg/kg

Participants received Crizanlizumab (SEG101) at 7.5 mg/kg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Crizanlizumab (SEG101)

Intervention Type DRUG

Crizanlizumab was supplied in single use 10 mL glass vials at a concentration of 10 mg/mL. One vial contains 100 mg of crizanlizumab. This is a concentrate for solution for infusion.

IV.

Placebo

Participants received the placebo drug.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo was supplied in single use 10 mL glass vials at a concentration of 0 mg/mL. This is a concentrate for solution for infusion IV.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Crizanlizumab (SEG101)

Crizanlizumab was supplied in single use 10 mL glass vials at a concentration of 10 mg/mL. One vial contains 100 mg of crizanlizumab. This is a concentrate for solution for infusion.

IV.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo was supplied in single use 10 mL glass vials at a concentration of 0 mg/mL. This is a concentrate for solution for infusion IV.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SEG101

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Written informed consent must be obtained prior to any screening procedures
2. Male or female patients aged 12 years and older on the day of signing informed consent. Adolescent include patients aged 12 to 17 years old and adults ≥ 18 years
3. Confirmed diagnosis of SCD by hemoglobin electrophoresis or high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) \[performed locally\]. All SCD genotypes are eligible, genotyping is not required for study entry
4. Experienced at least 2 VOCs leading to healthcare visit within the 12 months prior to screening visit as determined by medical history. Prior VOC leading to healthcare visit must resolve at least 7 days prior to Week 1 Day 1 and must include:

1. Pain crisis defined as an acute onset of pain for which there is no other medically determined explanation other than vaso- occlusion -
2. which requires a visit to a medical facility and/or healthcare professional,
3. and receipt of oral/parenteral opioids or parenteral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) analgesia Acute chest syndrome (ACS), priapism and hepatic or splenic sequestration will be considered VOC in this study
5. If receiving HU/HC or L-glutamine (local HA approved medicinal product), must have been receiving the drug for at least 6 months and at a stable dose for at least 3 months prior to Screening visit and plan to continue taking it at the same dose and schedule until the subject has reached one year of study treatment. Patients who have not been receiving such drug must not have received it for at least 6 months prior to Screening visit to be included. Patients must have evidence of insufficient control of acute pain, such as at least one VOC leading to healthcare visit while on HU/HC or L-Glutamine treatment. If receiving erythropoietin stimulating agent, must have been receiving the drug for at least 6 months prior to Screening visit and plan to continue taking the treatment to maintain stable Hb levels at least until the subject has reached one year of study treatment
6. Patients must meet the following central laboratory values prior to Week 1 Day 1:

* Absolute Neutrophil Count ≥1.0 x 109/L
* Platelet count ≥75 x 109/L
* Hemoglobin: for adults (Hb) ≥4.0 g/dL and for adolescents (Hb) ≥5.5 g/dL
* Glomerular filtration rate ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 using CKD-EPI formula in adults, and Shwartz formula in adolescents
* Direct (conjugated) bilirubin \< 2.0 x ULN
* Alanine transaminase (ALT) \< 3.0 x ULN
7. ECOG performance status ≤2.0 for adults and Karnofsky ≥ 50% for adolescents

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of stem cell transplant.
2. Participating in a chronic transfusion program (pre-planned series of transfusions for prophylactic purposes) and/or planning on undergoing an exchange transfusion during the duration of the study; episodic transfusion in response to worsened anemia or VOC is permitted.
3. Contraindication or hypersensitivity to any drug or metabolites from similar class as study drug or to any excipients of the study drug formulation. History of severe hypersensitivity reaction to other monoclonal antibodies, which in the opinion of the investigator may pose an increased risk of serious infusion reaction.
4. Received active treatment on another investigational trial within 30 days (or 5 half-lives of that agent, whichever is greater) prior to Screening visit or plans to participate in another investigational drug trial.
5. Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant unless they are using highly effective methods of contraception during dosing and for 15 weeks after stopping treatment.
6. Concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could cause unacceptable safety risks or compromise participation in the study.
7. History or current diagnosis of ECG abnormalities indicating significant risk of safety such as:

* Concomitant clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias (e.g ventricular tachycardia), and clinically significant second or third degree AV block without a pacemaker
* History of familial long QT syndrome or know family history of Torsades de Pointes
8. Not able to understand and to comply with study instructions and requirements.
9. Received prior treatment with crizanlizumab or other selectin targeting agent
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Childrens Healthcare of Atlanta

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Boston Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Levine Cancer Insitute Carolinas Healthcare System

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Univ of Tenn Health Sciences Ctr

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

U of TX Health Science Ct

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brussels, Brussels Capital, Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Belém, Pará, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barranquilla, Atlántico, Colombia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Valledupar, Cesar Department, Colombia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Montería, , Colombia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Accra, , Ghana

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pátrai, , Greece

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Genova, GE, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Milan, MI, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Verona, VR, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Irbid, , Jordan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Beirut, , Lebanon

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tripoli, , Lebanon

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

The Hague, South Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Khoudh, , Oman

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Panama City, Republica de Panama, Panama

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Panama City, , Panama

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Soweto, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Adana, Saricam, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Belgium Brazil Canada Colombia Finland France Germany Ghana Greece India Italy Jordan Lebanon Netherlands Oman Panama South Africa Spain Turkey (Türkiye) United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abboud MR, Cancado RD, De Montalembert M, Smith WR, Rimawi H, Voskaridou E, Guvenc B, Ataga KI, Keefe D, Grosch K, Watson J, Reshetnyak E, Nassin ML, Dei-Adomakoh Y. Crizanlizumab with or without hydroxyurea in patients with sickle cell disease (STAND): primary analyses from a placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2025 Apr;12(4):e248-e257. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00384-3. Epub 2025 Mar 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40088922 (View on PubMed)

Obadina M, Wilson S, Derebail VK, Little J. Emerging Therapies and Advances in Sickle Cell Disease with a Focus on Renal Manifestations. Kidney360. 2023 Jul 1;4(7):997-1005. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000162. Epub 2023 May 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37254256 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2017-001746-10

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CSEG101A2301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.