A Safety and Efficacy Study of Eltrombopag in Subjects With AML
NCT ID: NCT01890746
Last Updated: 2019-09-11
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
148 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-09-05
2017-01-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Eltrombopag Olamine in Treating Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT01550185
Safety, Tolerability, PK, PD, and Efficacy of AMG 427 in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT03541369
Eltrombopag Treatment of Thrombocytopenia in Subjects With Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia After MDS (sAML/MDS)
NCT00903422
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Idasanutlin in Combination With Cytarabine and Daunorubicin in Patients Newly Diagnosed With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and the Safety and Efficacy of Idasanutlin in the Maintenance of First AML Complete Remission
NCT03850535
A Study of Sabatolimab and Magrolimab-based Treatment in AML or Higher Risk MDS Participants
NCT05367401
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Eltrombopag arm
Subjects received induction chemotherapy consisting of daunorubicin bolus intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 1-3 + cytarabine continuous IV infusion on Days 1-7 followed by Eltrombopag once daily orally starting on Day 4 of initial induction chemotherapy. If platelet count was not greater than 100 Gi/L after 7 days the dose was increased until a platelet count of at least 200 Gi/L was achieved/until remission was assessed/ maximum of 42 days from the start of the chemotherapy induction. Subjects who were not aplastic after first cycle of induction chemotherapy received second induction chemotherapy with a modified daunorubicin dose on Days 1-3 + cytarabine on Days 1-7.
Daunorubicin
For subjects between the ages of 18 and 60 years, 90 mg/m2/day by bolus IV injection through a freshly established free-flowing IV line for 10-15 minutes on days 1, 2, and 3. For subjects \> 60 years: daunorubicin dose was adjusted to 60mg /m2.
Cytarabine
100 mg/m2/day continuous IV infusion on Days 1 through 7.
Eltrombopag
200 mg orally, once daily, beginning on Day 4 of the first cycle of induction. After 7 days, the dose of the Investigational Product (IP) was to be increased to 300 mg if platelet counts were \<100 Gi/L. IP continued until achievement of platelet count of at least 200 Gi/L or assessment of remission of bone marrow status or a maximum of 42 days after initiation of most recent induction. In subjects of East Asian heritage 100 mg orally once daily (a 50% dose reduction) was used and after 7 days, the dose of IP was increased to 150 mg if platelet counts were \<100 Gi/L.
Placebo arm
Subject received induction chemotherapy consisting of daunorubicin bolus IV infusion on Days 1-3 + cytarabine continuous IV infusion on Days 1-7 followed by matching placebo once daily oral dose starting on Day 4 of initial induction chemotherapy. If platelet count was not greater than 100 Gi/L after 7 days the matching placebo was given until a platelet count of at least 200 Gi/L was achieved/ until remission was assessed/ maximum of 42 days from the start of the chemotherapy induction. Subjects who were not aplastic after first cycle of induction chemotherapy received a second induction chemotherapy with a modified daunorubicin dose on Days 1-3 + cytarabine on Days 1-7.
Daunorubicin
For subjects between the ages of 18 and 60 years, 90 mg/m2/day by bolus IV injection through a freshly established free-flowing IV line for 10-15 minutes on days 1, 2, and 3. For subjects \> 60 years: daunorubicin dose was adjusted to 60mg /m2.
Cytarabine
100 mg/m2/day continuous IV infusion on Days 1 through 7.
Placebo
Orally, once daily, beginning on Day 4 of the first cycle of induction. After 7 days, the dose given was matching 300 mg Eltrombopag if platelet counts were \<100 Gi/L. Placebo continued until achievement of platelet count of at least 200 Gi/L or assessment of remission of bone marrow status or a maximum of 42 days after initiation of most recent induction. In subjects of East Asian heritage placebo matching 100 mg Eltrombopag orally once daily was used and after 7 days, the placebo matching 150 mg Eltrombopag was given if platelet counts were \<100 Gi/L.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Daunorubicin
For subjects between the ages of 18 and 60 years, 90 mg/m2/day by bolus IV injection through a freshly established free-flowing IV line for 10-15 minutes on days 1, 2, and 3. For subjects \> 60 years: daunorubicin dose was adjusted to 60mg /m2.
Cytarabine
100 mg/m2/day continuous IV infusion on Days 1 through 7.
Eltrombopag
200 mg orally, once daily, beginning on Day 4 of the first cycle of induction. After 7 days, the dose of the Investigational Product (IP) was to be increased to 300 mg if platelet counts were \<100 Gi/L. IP continued until achievement of platelet count of at least 200 Gi/L or assessment of remission of bone marrow status or a maximum of 42 days after initiation of most recent induction. In subjects of East Asian heritage 100 mg orally once daily (a 50% dose reduction) was used and after 7 days, the dose of IP was increased to 150 mg if platelet counts were \<100 Gi/L.
Placebo
Orally, once daily, beginning on Day 4 of the first cycle of induction. After 7 days, the dose given was matching 300 mg Eltrombopag if platelet counts were \<100 Gi/L. Placebo continued until achievement of platelet count of at least 200 Gi/L or assessment of remission of bone marrow status or a maximum of 42 days after initiation of most recent induction. In subjects of East Asian heritage placebo matching 100 mg Eltrombopag orally once daily was used and after 7 days, the placebo matching 150 mg Eltrombopag was given if platelet counts were \<100 Gi/L.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosed with AML according to the WHO 2008 classification. Note: subjects with secondary AML following Myelodysplastic syndrome or secondary to previous leukemogenic therapy are allowed provided that a record of previous MDS history or leukemogenic therapy history is available.
* Eligible for induction by daunorubicin + cytarabine.
* Eligible to give informed consent to participate in the study.
* Have adequate baseline organ function defined by the following criteria:
Total bilirubin \<=1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) except for Gilbert's syndrome, or other conditions that are not indicative of inadequate liver function (i.e. elevation of indirect bilirubin (haemolytic) in the absence of alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\] abnormality).
ALT \<=3 x ULN. Serum Creatinine \<=2.5 x ULN.
* Adequate cardiac function with LVEF \>=50% as assessed by echocardiogram (ECHO) or Multi Gated Acquisition Scan (MUGA.
* Subjects with a QT interval corrected for heart rate according to Bazett's formula (QTcB) \<450millisecond (msec) or \<480msec for subjects with bundle branch block. The QTc should be based on single or averaged QTc values of triplicate electrocardiograms (ECGs) obtained over a brief recording period.
* Women must be either of non-childbearing potential or women with child-bearing potential and men with reproductive potential must be willing to practice acceptable methods of birth control during the study.
* Men with a female partner of childbearing potential must have either had a prior vasectomy or agree to use effective contraception from time of randomization until 30 days after the last dose of investigational product.
* Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days of first dose of study treatment and agree to use effective contraception during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of investigational product.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous history of exposure to an anthracycline compound.
* Previous AML treatment (other than hydroxyurea).
* Any serious medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that, in the view of the treating physician, would place the participant at an unacceptable risk if he or she were to participate in the study or would prevent that person from giving informed consent.
* History of thromboembolic event or other condition requiring ongoing use of anticoagulation either with warfarin or low molecular-weight heparin. Note: Occlusion of a central line is not exclusion.
* Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half lives, whichever is longer, preceding the first dose of study medication.
* Current and continued use during study treatment period of known Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) inhibitors or known P-gp inhibitors.
* Known active hepatitis B, hepatitis C or Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection.
* Known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or its excipients.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Novartis Investigative Site
Farmington, Connecticut, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Miami, Florida, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Orlando, Florida, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Ames, Iowa, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Sioux City, Iowa, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Burlington, Massachusetts, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Rochester, New York, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Canton, Ohio, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Brussels, , Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Leuven, , Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, , Greece
Novartis Investigative Site
Pátrai, , Greece
Novartis Investigative Site
Debrecen, , Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Szeged, , Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Haifa, , Israel
Novartis Investigative Site
Holon, , Israel
Novartis Investigative Site
Jerusalem, , Israel
Novartis Investigative Site
Jerusalem, , Israel
Novartis Investigative Site
Kfar Saba, , Israel
Novartis Investigative Site
Tel Aviv, , Israel
Novartis Investigative Site
Słupsk, , Poland
Novartis Investigative Site
Wroclaw, , Poland
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaluga, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Penza, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
St'Petersburg, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Tula, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, , South Korea
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, , South Korea
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, Korea, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Frey N, Jang JH, Szer J, Illes A, Kim HJ, Ram R, Chong BH, Rowe JM, Borisenkova E, Liesveld J, Winer ES, Cherfi A, Aslanis V, Ghaznawi F, Strickland S. Eltrombopag treatment during induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia: a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Mar;6(3):e122-e131. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30231-X. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013-000642-20
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
117146
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.