A Safety and Efficacy Study of Eltrombopag in Subjects With AML

NCT ID: NCT01890746

Last Updated: 2019-09-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

148 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-05

Study Completion Date

2017-01-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study was to provide clinical safety and exploratory efficacy data on the use of Eltrombopag in adult subjects with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) receiving standard induction chemotherapy with daunorubicin plus cytarabine. A minimum of 120 evaluable subjects newly diagnosed with AML was stratified by antecedent malignant hematologic disorder and age.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Leukaemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Eltrombopag arm

Subjects received induction chemotherapy consisting of daunorubicin bolus intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 1-3 + cytarabine continuous IV infusion on Days 1-7 followed by Eltrombopag once daily orally starting on Day 4 of initial induction chemotherapy. If platelet count was not greater than 100 Gi/L after 7 days the dose was increased until a platelet count of at least 200 Gi/L was achieved/until remission was assessed/ maximum of 42 days from the start of the chemotherapy induction. Subjects who were not aplastic after first cycle of induction chemotherapy received second induction chemotherapy with a modified daunorubicin dose on Days 1-3 + cytarabine on Days 1-7.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Daunorubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

For subjects between the ages of 18 and 60 years, 90 mg/m2/day by bolus IV injection through a freshly established free-flowing IV line for 10-15 minutes on days 1, 2, and 3. For subjects \> 60 years: daunorubicin dose was adjusted to 60mg /m2.

Cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

100 mg/m2/day continuous IV infusion on Days 1 through 7.

Eltrombopag

Intervention Type DRUG

200 mg orally, once daily, beginning on Day 4 of the first cycle of induction. After 7 days, the dose of the Investigational Product (IP) was to be increased to 300 mg if platelet counts were \<100 Gi/L. IP continued until achievement of platelet count of at least 200 Gi/L or assessment of remission of bone marrow status or a maximum of 42 days after initiation of most recent induction. In subjects of East Asian heritage 100 mg orally once daily (a 50% dose reduction) was used and after 7 days, the dose of IP was increased to 150 mg if platelet counts were \<100 Gi/L.

Placebo arm

Subject received induction chemotherapy consisting of daunorubicin bolus IV infusion on Days 1-3 + cytarabine continuous IV infusion on Days 1-7 followed by matching placebo once daily oral dose starting on Day 4 of initial induction chemotherapy. If platelet count was not greater than 100 Gi/L after 7 days the matching placebo was given until a platelet count of at least 200 Gi/L was achieved/ until remission was assessed/ maximum of 42 days from the start of the chemotherapy induction. Subjects who were not aplastic after first cycle of induction chemotherapy received a second induction chemotherapy with a modified daunorubicin dose on Days 1-3 + cytarabine on Days 1-7.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Daunorubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

For subjects between the ages of 18 and 60 years, 90 mg/m2/day by bolus IV injection through a freshly established free-flowing IV line for 10-15 minutes on days 1, 2, and 3. For subjects \> 60 years: daunorubicin dose was adjusted to 60mg /m2.

Cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

100 mg/m2/day continuous IV infusion on Days 1 through 7.

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Orally, once daily, beginning on Day 4 of the first cycle of induction. After 7 days, the dose given was matching 300 mg Eltrombopag if platelet counts were \<100 Gi/L. Placebo continued until achievement of platelet count of at least 200 Gi/L or assessment of remission of bone marrow status or a maximum of 42 days after initiation of most recent induction. In subjects of East Asian heritage placebo matching 100 mg Eltrombopag orally once daily was used and after 7 days, the placebo matching 150 mg Eltrombopag was given if platelet counts were \<100 Gi/L.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Daunorubicin

For subjects between the ages of 18 and 60 years, 90 mg/m2/day by bolus IV injection through a freshly established free-flowing IV line for 10-15 minutes on days 1, 2, and 3. For subjects \> 60 years: daunorubicin dose was adjusted to 60mg /m2.

Intervention Type DRUG

Cytarabine

100 mg/m2/day continuous IV infusion on Days 1 through 7.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eltrombopag

200 mg orally, once daily, beginning on Day 4 of the first cycle of induction. After 7 days, the dose of the Investigational Product (IP) was to be increased to 300 mg if platelet counts were \<100 Gi/L. IP continued until achievement of platelet count of at least 200 Gi/L or assessment of remission of bone marrow status or a maximum of 42 days after initiation of most recent induction. In subjects of East Asian heritage 100 mg orally once daily (a 50% dose reduction) was used and after 7 days, the dose of IP was increased to 150 mg if platelet counts were \<100 Gi/L.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Orally, once daily, beginning on Day 4 of the first cycle of induction. After 7 days, the dose given was matching 300 mg Eltrombopag if platelet counts were \<100 Gi/L. Placebo continued until achievement of platelet count of at least 200 Gi/L or assessment of remission of bone marrow status or a maximum of 42 days after initiation of most recent induction. In subjects of East Asian heritage placebo matching 100 mg Eltrombopag orally once daily was used and after 7 days, the placebo matching 150 mg Eltrombopag was given if platelet counts were \<100 Gi/L.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \>=18 years
* Diagnosed with AML according to the WHO 2008 classification. Note: subjects with secondary AML following Myelodysplastic syndrome or secondary to previous leukemogenic therapy are allowed provided that a record of previous MDS history or leukemogenic therapy history is available.
* Eligible for induction by daunorubicin + cytarabine.
* Eligible to give informed consent to participate in the study.
* Have adequate baseline organ function defined by the following criteria:

Total bilirubin \<=1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) except for Gilbert's syndrome, or other conditions that are not indicative of inadequate liver function (i.e. elevation of indirect bilirubin (haemolytic) in the absence of alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\] abnormality).

ALT \<=3 x ULN. Serum Creatinine \<=2.5 x ULN.

* Adequate cardiac function with LVEF \>=50% as assessed by echocardiogram (ECHO) or Multi Gated Acquisition Scan (MUGA.
* Subjects with a QT interval corrected for heart rate according to Bazett's formula (QTcB) \<450millisecond (msec) or \<480msec for subjects with bundle branch block. The QTc should be based on single or averaged QTc values of triplicate electrocardiograms (ECGs) obtained over a brief recording period.
* Women must be either of non-childbearing potential or women with child-bearing potential and men with reproductive potential must be willing to practice acceptable methods of birth control during the study.
* Men with a female partner of childbearing potential must have either had a prior vasectomy or agree to use effective contraception from time of randomization until 30 days after the last dose of investigational product.
* Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days of first dose of study treatment and agree to use effective contraception during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of investigational product.

Exclusion Criteria

* A diagnosis of acute promyelocytic (M3) or acute megakaryocytic leukaemia (M7).
* Previous history of exposure to an anthracycline compound.
* Previous AML treatment (other than hydroxyurea).
* Any serious medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that, in the view of the treating physician, would place the participant at an unacceptable risk if he or she were to participate in the study or would prevent that person from giving informed consent.
* History of thromboembolic event or other condition requiring ongoing use of anticoagulation either with warfarin or low molecular-weight heparin. Note: Occlusion of a central line is not exclusion.
* Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half lives, whichever is longer, preceding the first dose of study medication.
* Current and continued use during study treatment period of known Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) inhibitors or known P-gp inhibitors.
* Known active hepatitis B, hepatitis C or Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection.
* Known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or its excipients.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Novartis Investigative Site

Farmington, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ames, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sioux City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Burlington, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pátrai, , Greece

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Holon, , Israel

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Słupsk, , Poland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kaluga, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Penza, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

St'Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tula, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, Korea, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Canada Greece Hungary Israel Poland Russia South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Frey N, Jang JH, Szer J, Illes A, Kim HJ, Ram R, Chong BH, Rowe JM, Borisenkova E, Liesveld J, Winer ES, Cherfi A, Aslanis V, Ghaznawi F, Strickland S. Eltrombopag treatment during induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia: a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Mar;6(3):e122-e131. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30231-X. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30704923 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-000642-20

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

117146

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.