rTMS and Conventional Physical Therapy After Stroke

NCT ID: NCT01875536

Last Updated: 2013-06-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-11-30

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Given previous evidence that non invasive brain stimulation enhances the effects of conventional therapies, this randomized sham-controlled trial with 4-weeks follow-up aimed to determine if the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)combined with conventional physical therapy (VRT) would be superior to physical therapy in improving upper limb function and quality of life with chronic stroke individuals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

rTMS

The experimental group received rTMS to the primary motor cortex of the unaffected side in 10 sessions, 3 days per week, and conventional physical therapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rTMS

Intervention Type DEVICE

The subjects were seated in a comfortable chair with head and arm rests. Focal TMS of the motor cortex was performed with a 70-mm figure-8 coil attached to magnetic stimulator stimulation parameters : frequency of 1Hz on the uninjured hemisphere by stroke; 1500 pulses with an intensity of 90% of MT 10 sessions of rTMS, one per day, always before conventional physical therapy

conventional physical therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The physical therapy program was composed of the activities of flexibility, transfer and posture, strength, coordination, balance, and sensory stimulation. The physical therapy was applied for about 30 minutes, three days per week.

control

The control group received sham stimulation (same area as the experimental group) in 10 sessions, 3 days per week, and conventional physical therapy

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

conventional physical therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The physical therapy program was composed of the activities of flexibility, transfer and posture, strength, coordination, balance, and sensory stimulation. The physical therapy was applied for about 30 minutes, three days per week.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

rTMS

The subjects were seated in a comfortable chair with head and arm rests. Focal TMS of the motor cortex was performed with a 70-mm figure-8 coil attached to magnetic stimulator stimulation parameters : frequency of 1Hz on the uninjured hemisphere by stroke; 1500 pulses with an intensity of 90% of MT 10 sessions of rTMS, one per day, always before conventional physical therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

conventional physical therapy

The physical therapy program was composed of the activities of flexibility, transfer and posture, strength, coordination, balance, and sensory stimulation. The physical therapy was applied for about 30 minutes, three days per week.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* stroke onset ≥ 6 months;
* muscle tone at the wrist with a modified Ashworth scale (MAS) score between 1+ and 3;
* minimum age of 30 years old and maximum age of 75 years;
* absence of cognitive impairment, as determined by the cut-off scores on the Mini-mental state exam

Exclusion Criteria

* history of seizure or cerebral aneurism;
* antispasticity drugs within 6 months before enrollment;
* previous surgery involving metallic implants;
* unstable vital signs;
* other neurological diseases
* aphasia
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kátia Monte-Silva

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Applied Neuroscience Laboratory-LANA

Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

rTMS_Physical Therapy_stroke

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.