The CARS Study: Communicating About Readiness (for Discharge)

NCT ID: NCT01873105

Last Updated: 2019-04-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

604 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-31

Study Completion Date

2016-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to improve the experience of discharge of adult medical surgical patients through improved discharge preparation communication between patients and care team members, with subsequent improvement in the post-discharge experience. Obtaining multiple perspectives on discharge readiness creates the opportunity for patient and care team to partner in identifying deficiencies in discharge readiness that warrant anticipatory, compensatory, or corrective interventions prior to discharge, with the goal of averting post-discharge problems and utilization. The results will also inform development and translation of tools for assessment of discharge readiness to clinical care environments.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Specific Aims are to:

1. Describe patterns of communication about discharge and collaboration among members of the health care team
2. Conduct psychometric testing of 3 forms of the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS - MD, RN, Patient)
3. Describe relationships between care team communication, patient perceptions of quality of discharge preparation and perceived readiness for discharge, care team (RN and MD) assessments of discharge readiness, and post-discharge outcome ( post-discharge coping difficulty, Emergency Department (ED) use, and 30 day readmission.
4. Determine the impact of an intervention with the inpatient care team to improve discharge preparation communication.

H1: Patient perceptions of discharge readiness, post-discharge coping difficulty, ED use and readmission will improve following a care team educational intervention about discharge preparation, compared to pre-intervention baseline measures.

H2: Care team members will report improved frequency and amount of discharge preparation communication following a care team educational intervention about discharge preparation, compared to pre-intervention baseline measures.

H3: RN-MD collaboration will increase following a care team educational intervention about discharge preparation, compared to pre-intervention baseline measures

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hospital Discharge Communication Processes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Before/after implementation of a health team communication intervention. 2 samples.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Health team educational intervention

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) TeamSTEPPS approach will be used to redesign health team communication processes regarding preparation for discharge. This redesign will be followed by education for all health team members.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Health Team Educational Intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

AHRQ TeamStepps processes will be used to redesign health team discharge communication processes and an educational intervention for health care team members

Control pre-intervention

Usual care control before implementation of the health team communication intervention

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Health Team Educational Intervention

AHRQ TeamStepps processes will be used to redesign health team discharge communication processes and an educational intervention for health care team members

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* inpatient care team members from 2 nursing units of an academic medical center: Attending physician, resident, medical students, mid-level providers, staff RNs, and case managers/discharge coordinators
* adult medical-surgical patients admitted the 2 nursing units who are at least 18 years of age, speak English, and discharged directly home

Exclusion Criteria

* patient discharged home with hospice care
* patients not discharged directly home
* decisionally incapacitated patients
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Froedtert Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Marquette University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marianne Weiss

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marianne Weiss, DNSc RN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Marquette Unoversity

Kristi Opper, MS RN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Froedtert Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Froedtert Hospital

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRO00019092

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Information Presentation Formats
NCT02267928 COMPLETED NA