Study Comparing Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST) to Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) for Depression in Older Adults

NCT ID: NCT01869374

Last Updated: 2020-09-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-08-31

Study Completion Date

2020-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the feasibility, tolerability and efficacy of Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST) in elderly patients with a major depressive episode, who are randomly assigned to receive an acute course of MST or ECT.

The investigators hypothesize:

1. MST and ECT will have similar antidepressant efficacy
2. MST will have less post-treatment amnesia than ECT as reflected in a primary measures of anterograde and retrograde amnesia following the acute treatment phase.
3. At follow up, MST will show a lesser degree of persisting deficit in measures of retrograde amnesia than ECT.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and side effects of Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST) and Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in older adults currently experiencing a major depressive episode in the context of either unipolar or bipolar depression. ECT is known to be highly effective in treating depression, but it can have some adverse cognitive side effects. MST is a new form of convulsive therapy that is being developed as a means of improving the side effect profile of ECT so that more patients may benefit without suffering significant detrimental effects on cognition.

Both ECT and MST rely on a therapeutic seizure, but they do so in different ways. In ECT, an electrical stimulator is used to pass electrical current between two electrodes placed on the surface of person's head, which causes some electricity to go through the brain and cause a seizure. In MST, a magnetic stimulator is used to create a magnetic field in a targeted area of the brain, which induces a small electrical field in the neurons that causes a seizure. Treatments will be administered three times a week.

In addition to the treatment sessions, this study will involve a number of assessments at different time-points (i.e., baseline prior to treatment, post-treatment, 2 months post-treatment and 6 months post-treatment) that are used to evaluate the person's antidepressant response and the physical and cognitive side effects of treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Depression Major Depressive Episode Bipolar Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Electroconvulsive Therapy / Magnetic Seizure Therapy
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST)

MagVenture MagPro MST device

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MagVenture MagPro MST

Intervention Type DEVICE

Brain stimulation by magnetic means versus electrical standard unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy (RUL ECT). Treatment will be administered 3 times a week.

RUL ECT

Right Unilateral ECT with the Somatics Thymatron device using Ultrabrief stimulus

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

RUL ECT

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

RUL ECT using the Somatics Thymatron device with Ultrabrief stimulus. Treatment will be administered 3 times a week.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MagVenture MagPro MST

Brain stimulation by magnetic means versus electrical standard unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy (RUL ECT). Treatment will be administered 3 times a week.

Intervention Type DEVICE

RUL ECT

RUL ECT using the Somatics Thymatron device with Ultrabrief stimulus. Treatment will be administered 3 times a week.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 55-90
* Clinical diagnosis of major depressive episode, in the context of unipolar or bipolar disorder
* Willing and capable to provide informed consent
* Convulsive therapy clinically indicated
* Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD24)≥ 20
* Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) ≥ 24
* For outpatients: responsible adult living with the patient

Exclusion Criteria

* Current unstable or serious medical condition, or any comorbid medical condition that substantially increases the risks of ECT (such as acute myocardial infarction, space occupying brain lesion or other cause of increased intracranial pressure, unstable aneurysm or vascular malformation, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, carcinoma, renal failure, hepatic failure)
* History of neurological disorder, epilepsy, stroke, brain surgery, metal in the head, history of known structural brain lesion
* Presence of devices that may be affected by MST (pacemaker, medication pump, cochlear implant, implanted brain stimulator, or vagus nerve stimulator implanted)
* History of head trauma with loss of consciousness for greater than 5 minutes
* History of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or rapid cycling bipolar disorder
* History of substance abuse or dependence in past 3 months
* Failure to respond to an adequate course of ECT in the current depressive episode
* History of ECT in the past 6 months and/or failure to respond to an adequate trial of ECT lifetime
* Presence of intracardiac lines
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

New York State Psychiatric Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stefan Rowny

Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychiatry

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stefan B Rowny, MD, MFA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NYSPI/Columbia University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

New York State Psychiatric Institute

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rowny, S., & Lisanby, S. H. (2009). Other Brain Stimulation Methods. In B. J. Sadock, V.A. Sadock & P. Ruiz (Eds.) . Kaplan and Sadock's Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry (9th ed.) (Pp. 3301-3314). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Philadelphia:PA.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Rowny SB, Benzl K, Lisanby SH. Translational development strategy for magnetic seizure therapy. Exp Neurol. 2009 Sep;219(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.03.029. Epub 2009 Apr 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19348798 (View on PubMed)

McClintock SM, DeWind NK, Husain MM, Rowny SB, Spellman TJ, Terrace H, Lisanby SH. Disruption of component processes of spatial working memory by electroconvulsive shock but not magnetic seizure therapy. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Feb;16(1):177-87. doi: 10.1017/S1461145711001866. Epub 2012 Jan 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22217479 (View on PubMed)

Rowny SB, Cycowicz YM, McClintock SM, Truesdale MD, Luber B, Lisanby SH. Differential heart rate response to magnetic seizure therapy (MST) relative to electroconvulsive therapy: a nonhuman primate model. Neuroimage. 2009 Sep;47(3):1086-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.070. Epub 2009 Jun 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19497373 (View on PubMed)

Rowny, S., & Lisanby, S. H. (2008). Brain Stimulation in Psychiatry. In A. Tasman, J. Kay, J. A. Lieberman, M. B. First & M. Maj (Eds.), Psychiatry (3rd ed.) (pp.2354-2371). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9780470515167.ch109

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Jiang J, Zhang C, Li C, Chen Z, Cao X, Wang H, Li W, Wang J. Magnetic seizure therapy for treatment-resistant depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 16;6(6):CD013528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013528.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34131914 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

6427

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Predict MDE Outcomes After MST
NCT03841019 COMPLETED NA