Effects of a Single OMT on Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in Ocular Hypertenive or Glaucoma Suspect Subjects
NCT ID: NCT01864642
Last Updated: 2014-08-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
28 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-07-31
2014-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of a Single Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) on Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Reduction
NCT03590249
Foot Reflexology in Ocular Hypertensive and Glaucoma Patients
NCT04695314
Changes in Ocular Rigidity After Trabeculectomy in Patients With POAG
NCT02544646
Assessment of Optic Nerve Radiation in Patients With Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension by 7 Tesla Diffusion Tensor Imaging
NCT01864317
Regulation of Intraocular Pressure in Glaucoma Patients by Acupressure
NCT05898997
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The intervention is OMT. Based on the anatomy of the eye and the dysfunctions underlying primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), the presumed mechanisms are one or the other or a combination of the following. 1) Anatomic: the OMT benefit may occur by the biomechanical restoration of drainage through the trabecular meshwork and Schlemm's canal. 2) Neurologic: the OMT may affect the parasympathetic innervations from the Edinger-Westphal fibers via the cranial nerve III as well as the sympathetic innervations arising in the T1 to T3 levels then via the superior cervical ganglion which then course to the eye.
The OMT protocol takes 25-27 minutes to administer and addresses cranial, cervical, upper body, spinal and sacral structures designed to affect the anatomic, physiologic processes (e.g. lymphatic drainage from the neck and face), neurologic structures (sympathic and parasympathetic) affecting visual processes. A very similar OMT protocol was used in a study on healthy elder and resulted in improved balance and equilibrium. In that study there were no adverse outcomes reported.
The control/comparator subjects will lay on the OMT table for the same 25-27 minutes in the same time periods in which experimental subjects were in the prone, lateral recumbent, and supine positions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
osteopathic manipulative treatment
osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT)
osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT)
osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT)
OMT is a form of manual medicine performed by osteopathic physicians
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT)
osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT)
OMT is a form of manual medicine performed by osteopathic physicians
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subjects with confirmed ocular hypertension (OHT) or glaucoma suspects whose IOP was ≥ 20 mmHg at two measurements separated by at least 3 months.
3. Subjects who do not have visual field defect(s), as determined by Visual Field Analysis within the last year.
4. Subjects who do not have abnormal cupping of the optic nerve head.
5. Subjects who do not have narrow angles as determined by gonioscopy (must be at least angle grade 2 to 3; Shaffer Classification Scale) recorded in the subject's patient record or as determined by biomicroscopy.
6. Subjects who have not been treated with ocular hypotensive agents (or, if they have been treated, not for at least the preceding 3 months). In essence, the subjects will have been and be undergoing "watchful waiting" by their eye care practitioner(s) because no definitive diagnosis of glaucoma requiring treatment has been made.
7. Subjects must satisfy all informed consent requirements. 8 Subjects whose mean IOP measurements in at least one (1) eye, the same eye(s), must be:
9\. Greater than or equal to 20 mmHg at the 8 AM time-point on the Screening and Enrollment Visits (1 and 2) and 10. Greater than or equal to 19 mmHg at the 10 AM, 12 Noon, and 4 PM time-points on the Screening and Enrollment Visits (1 and 2).
\-
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subjects who have a concurrent diagnosis of cancer or metastatic disease affecting the head and neck.
3. Subjects who have been diagnosed with glaucoma or ocular hypertension and whose condition requires medical treatment other than "watchful waiting."
4. Subjects who are less than 18 years old.
5. Subjects who are lactating, pregnant, or plan to become pregnant in the time planned for the study.
6. Subjects who have a history of chronic or recurrent severe inflammatory eye disease (e.g., scleritis, uveitis) in either eye as determined by patient history and/or examination.
7. Subjects who have a history of clinically significant or progressive retinal disease in either eye such as retinal degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, or retinal detachment with permanent field loss as determined by patient history and/or examination.
8. Subjects who have a history of serious ocular trauma in either eye within the past six (6) months as determined by patient history and/or examination.
9. Subjects who have had intraocular surgery in either eye within the past six (6) months as determined by patient history and/or examination.
10. Subjects who have had ocular laser surgery in either eye within the past three (3) months as determined by patient history and/or examination.
11. Subjects who have a history of ocular infection or ocular inflammation in either eye within the past three (3) months as determined by patient history and/or examination.
12. Subjects who have any abnormality preventing reliable applanation tonometry of either eye (e.g., keratoconus, corneal or conjunctival scarring).
13. Subjects who have any abnormality preventing reliable assessment of pupil diameter in either eye (e.g., congenital pupil anomaly, posterior synechiae, anterior cleavage syndrome, afferent defects, prior surgery, etc.).
14. Subjects who have less than a thirty (30) days stable dosing regimen before the Screening and Enrollment Visits (Visits 1 and 2) of any non-ocular medications that may affect IOP, administered by any route and used on a chronic basis. These may include, but are not limited to, alpha agonists, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, antimuscarinic agents, and phenothiazines.
15. Subjects who have other treatments and/or surgeries unrelated to the eye condition scheduled in the time planned for the study.
16. Subjects who are allergic to Latex, PABA, Proparacaine, or Fluorescein.
17. Subjects who have had prior surgical or laser treatment for the purpose of lowering their IOP.
18. Subjects who currently have systemic infections resulting in fever or immunosuppression.
19. Subjects who have had previous OMT, chiropractic manipulation, massage, or other forms of manual therapy within the last 2 months.
20. Subjects who are unable to give appropriate informed consent due to mental or other limitations.
21. Additionally, the Principal Investigator may declare any subject ineligible for a valid medical reason.
\-
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hollis H King, DO, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Univ Wisconsin Dept of Family Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UW Dept of Ophthalmology Clinic
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UW IRB 2012-1102
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.