Study Comparing Fit of the iTotal Versus Standard Total Knee Implants
NCT ID: NCT01861028
Last Updated: 2023-10-25
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
44 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-02-28
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Costs and Benefits of ConforMIS iTotalĀ® Knee Replacement System Versus Standard Total Knee
NCT01899417
Comparison of Functional Outcomes of Three Surgical Approaches in Knee Arthroplasty
NCT00983762
Comparison of Implant Positioning With Robotic Aided Surgery and Traditional Jig Positioning in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03052790
Evaluation of Standard and Robot Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Bicrucatie Retaining Prosthesis
NCT04334304
Balancing Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Replacements During Total Primary Knee Arthroplasty Using Verasense
NCT03286868
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All additional data will be obtained from pre and post-operative subject surveys, operative and discharge records and radiographs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Phase I
A series of 50 consecutive primary iTotal patients will be compared to assess the fit of the tibial tray intra-operatively. These patients will have a series of tibial templates from Standard TKR implant sets trialed on the operative knee. Each template will be optimally sized and positioned based on the surgeon's judgment. Implant fit data (overhang and underhang) on the tibia for all templates will be taken from intra-operative measurements
No interventions assigned to this group
Phase II
The Phase I (50 consecutive primary iTotal patients) will also have implant fit data assessed for the femur. After final implantation is complete measurement will be assessed and recorded. A series of 25 primary knees that are scheduled for Standard TKR implants will then undergo the same measurements of the femur.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient who are scheduled for patient-specific total knee replacement (iTotal)
* Patient age \> 18 years
Exclusion Criteria
* Unwilling or unable to comply with study requirements
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Restor3D
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gregory Martin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
JFK Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
JFK Medical Center
Atlantis, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12-002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.