Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-01-31
2010-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Youth Drug Abuse Family and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
NCT00198874
Family-Based Juvenile Drug Court Services
NCT01668303
Testing a Promising Treatment for Youth Substance Abuse in a Community Setting
NCT02130479
Family-based and Adolescent Residential Drug Treatment
NCT01737632
Integrated Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Substance Abuse in Young Adults
NCT02667119
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study has four aims:
Aim 1: To explore links between hurricane-related stress and trauma and youths' substance abuse.
Hypothesis 1: Severity of youths' substance use at intake to treatment will be predicted by level of exposure to Hurricane Katrina, stressful life events following Katrina, trauma symptoms, and coping.
Aim 2: To investigate in a community based randomized control trial the effectiveness of a family-based intervention (MDFT) vs. group CBT for teen substance abusers impacted by Hurricane Katrina.
Hypothesis 2a: Family-based treatment (MDFT) will more effectively reduce youths' substance abuse, delinquency, trauma, and school problems up to one year post-intake than a group CBT approach.
Hypothesis 2b: Family-based treatment (MDFT) will more effectively reduce parents' stress and family conflict up to one year post-intake than group CBT.
Hypothesis 2c: Youth assigned to MDFT will be less likely to meet diagnostic criteria for PTSD at 12 month post-intake than group CBT.
Aim 3: To examine teen and parent coping as mediators of treatment effects.
Hypothesis 3a: Youth in MDFT will develop more effective coping strategies than those in group CBT through improved parental coping and parenting practices, and lower family conflict, as well as directly through intervention effects.
Hypothesis 3b: Youth in MDFT will achieve greater reductions in substance abuse and trauma symptoms than those in group treatment through more effective coping during the 12 month follow-up period.
Aim 4: To explore moderators of treatment effects based on post-Katrina stress and trauma symptoms.
Hypothesis 4: The advantage of MDFT over group CBT in decreasing substance abuse will be more pronounced with youth who report higher levels of disaster-related stress and trauma symptoms at intake.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Multidimensional Family Therapy
MDFT is a multi-systems family-based approach (Liddle, 2002a) designed to address the multiple developmental disruptions and symptoms that result from interacting individual, family, peer, and community risk factors (Liddle, 2002a). MDFT assesses and intervenes at multiple levels and in multiple domains of the adolescent's life -- individual, familial and extrafamilial.
Multidimensional Family Therapy
MDFT assesses and intervenes in four domains to address comorbid substance abuse and trauma symptoms: 1) adolescent, 2) parent, 3) family, and 4) external systems. MDFT therapists will address trauma symptoms among both teens and parents, aiming to improve coping and reduce the impact of stress on the family. Consistent with a multidimensional approach, MDFT trauma-focused interventions address the needs of both youth and their parents, and MDFT therapists seek collaboration and advocacy from school and court personnel.
Group CBT
The group treatment employed in the proposed study is a state-of-the-art peer group-based CBT model. The treatment will be based on established guidelines for CBT therapy for teen substance abuse (CSAT, 1999; Waldron \& Kaminer, 2004) as well as trauma (La Greca \& Silverman, in press). The treatment adopts a risk and protective factor framework, seeking to reduce substance use both by targeting cognitions about use directly and by focusing on accompanying problem behaviors such as poor academic performance and limited social skills (Hawkins et al, 1992).
Group CBT
Trauma symptoms will be addressed using techniques designed to reduce cognitions that maintain anxiety and depressive symptoms and improve coping, such as cognitive restructuring, gradual exposure, and helping teens to understand and accept reminders of the event and ongoing stressors (Pynoos et al, 1998).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Multidimensional Family Therapy
MDFT assesses and intervenes in four domains to address comorbid substance abuse and trauma symptoms: 1) adolescent, 2) parent, 3) family, and 4) external systems. MDFT therapists will address trauma symptoms among both teens and parents, aiming to improve coping and reduce the impact of stress on the family. Consistent with a multidimensional approach, MDFT trauma-focused interventions address the needs of both youth and their parents, and MDFT therapists seek collaboration and advocacy from school and court personnel.
Group CBT
Trauma symptoms will be addressed using techniques designed to reduce cognitions that maintain anxiety and depressive symptoms and improve coping, such as cognitive restructuring, gradual exposure, and helping teens to understand and accept reminders of the event and ongoing stressors (Pynoos et al, 1998).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Meet ASAM criteria for outpatient substance abuse treatment
* At least mild trauma symptoms on PTSD-Reaction Index
* Not receiving any other behavioral treatment
* Parent/guardian willing to participate in the study/treatment
* Parent informed consent and youth informed assent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Psychotic disorder as indicated by record review
* current suicidality as indicated by verbalization of ideation + intent + plan in interview
13 Years
17 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
NIH
University of Miami
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cynthia Rowe
Research Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cynthia Rowe, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Miami
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
Miami, Florida, United States
The Center for Family and Youth Services
Luling, Louisiana, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rowe CL, La Greca AM, Alexandersson A. Family and individual factors associated with substance involvement and PTS symptoms among adolescents in greater New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Dec;78(6):806-817. doi: 10.1037/a0020808.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20057675
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.