Low Dose Chemotherapy Versus Best Supportive Care in Progressive Pediatric Malignancies

NCT ID: NCT01858571

Last Updated: 2017-01-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

108 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2017-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Many of the pediatric malignancies are not curable on progression on front line or 2nd line chemotherapy. Further therapy with conventional drugs imposes many side effects and decreases the QOL. The usual therapy offered to such patients is best supportive care.

Metronomic chemotherapy can induce tumor stabilization or tumor responses in patients with cancer that are refractory or have relapsed after conventional chemotherapy. Whether metronomic therapy is better than best supportive care is not known. In order to do so, a study is required which may compare metronomic therapy with a placebo therapy on PFS and QOL in relapsed refractory cases of pediatric solid tumors who have failed at least two lines of chemotherapy.

HYPOTHESIS

The investigators hypothesize that metronomic chemotherapy in progressive pediatric malignancy will improve PFS and QOL. If validated, then this form for therapy will be an option for both the patients and the clinicians, who are left with just an option of best supportive care in such situations of progressive pediatric cancers despite multiple lines of chemotherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Many of the pediatric malignancies are not curable on progression on front line or 2nd line chemotherapy. Further therapy with conventional drugs imposes many side effects and decreases the QOL. The usual therapy offered to such patients is best supportive care.

Metronomic chemotherapy can induce tumor stabilization or tumor responses in patients with cancer that are refractory or have relapsed after conventional chemotherapy. Whether metronomic therapy is better than best supportive care is not known. In order to do so, a study is required which may compare metronomic therapy with a placebo therapy on PFS and QOL in relapsed refractory cases of pediatric solid tumors who have failed at least two lines of chemotherapy.

It will be double blind randomized study. One group will receive metronomic therapy along with best supportive care and other will receive placebo and best supportive care.

The treatment will be continued till progression is documented. Metronomic chemotherapy schedule : Alternating cycles of Cycle A and B (Each cycle includes 3 weeks of drug administration) with each drug rounded off to the nearest tablet/capsule size.

Cycle A

* Daily oral Thalidomide (at 3mg/kg)
* Daily oral Celecoxib (100 mg BID for patients \< 20 kg, 200 mg BID for patients 20-50 kg, and 400 mg BID for patients \> 50 kg)
* Daily oral Etoposide (50 mg/m2/d) Cycle B
* Daily oral Thalidomide (at 3mg/kg)
* Daily oral Celecoxib (100 mg BID for patients \< 20 kg, 200 mg BID for patients 20-50 kg, and 400 mg BID for patients \> 50 kg)
* Daily oral Cyclophosphamide (2.5 mg/kg/d to a maximum of 100 mg/d) every 21 days

Placebo: Alternating cycles of Cycle A and B (Each cycle includes 3 weeks of drug administration)

* Capsules of same size and color as used in metronomic therapy Best supportive care
* Management of pain as per WHO standard for pain management

The dose of medications in capsules have to be rounded off to the nearest capsule size. Instead of rounding off on the daily dose, the total dose over the week would be calculated and rounded off and divided over 5-6 days in a week. This is being done so as to prevent any extra dosing.

If any grade 3-4 toxicity occurs in the first course, then the dose for chemotherapy would be reduced in the subsequent course by 20%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malignant Childhood Neoplasm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low dose chemotherapy

Alternating cycles of Cycle A and B (Each cycle includes 3 weeks of drug administration) with each drug rounded off to the nearest tablet/capsule size.

Cycle A

* Daily oral Thalidomide (at 3mg/kg)
* Daily oral Celecoxib (100 mg BID for patients \< 20 kg, 200 mg BID for patients 20-50 kg, and 400 mg BID for patients \> 50 kg)
* Daily oral Etoposide (50 mg/m2/d)

Cycle B

* Daily oral Thalidomide (at 3mg/kg)
* Daily oral Celecoxib (100 mg BID for patients \< 20 kg, 200 mg BID for patients 20-50 kg, and 400 mg BID for patients \> 50 kg)
* Daily oral Cyclophosphamide (2.5 mg/kg/d to a maximum of 100 mg/d) every 21 days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Low dose chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Metronomic chemotherapy schedule : Alternating cycles of Cycle A and B (Each cycle includes 3 weeks of drug administration) with each drug rounded off to the nearest tablet/capsule size.

Cycle A

* Daily oral Thalidomide (at 3mg/kg)
* Daily oral Celecoxib (100 mg BID for patients \< 20 kg, 200 mg BID for patients 20-50 kg, and 400 mg BID for patients \> 50 kg)
* Daily oral Etoposide (50 mg/m2/d)

Cycle B

* Daily oral Thalidomide (at 3mg/kg)
* Daily oral Celecoxib (100 mg BID for patients \< 20 kg, 200 mg BID for patients 20-50 kg, and 400 mg BID for patients \> 50 kg)
* Daily oral Cyclophosphamide (2.5 mg/kg/d to a maximum of 100 mg/d) every 21 days

Best supportive care

Placebo: Alternating cycles of Cycle A and B (Each cycle includes 3 weeks of drug administration)

* Capsules of same size and color as used in metronomic therapy Best supportive care
* Management of pain as per WHO standard for pain management

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Low dose chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Metronomic chemotherapy schedule : Alternating cycles of Cycle A and B (Each cycle includes 3 weeks of drug administration) with each drug rounded off to the nearest tablet/capsule size.

Cycle A

* Daily oral Thalidomide (at 3mg/kg)
* Daily oral Celecoxib (100 mg BID for patients \< 20 kg, 200 mg BID for patients 20-50 kg, and 400 mg BID for patients \> 50 kg)
* Daily oral Etoposide (50 mg/m2/d)

Cycle B

* Daily oral Thalidomide (at 3mg/kg)
* Daily oral Celecoxib (100 mg BID for patients \< 20 kg, 200 mg BID for patients 20-50 kg, and 400 mg BID for patients \> 50 kg)
* Daily oral Cyclophosphamide (2.5 mg/kg/d to a maximum of 100 mg/d) every 21 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Low dose chemotherapy

Metronomic chemotherapy schedule : Alternating cycles of Cycle A and B (Each cycle includes 3 weeks of drug administration) with each drug rounded off to the nearest tablet/capsule size.

Cycle A

* Daily oral Thalidomide (at 3mg/kg)
* Daily oral Celecoxib (100 mg BID for patients \< 20 kg, 200 mg BID for patients 20-50 kg, and 400 mg BID for patients \> 50 kg)
* Daily oral Etoposide (50 mg/m2/d)

Cycle B

* Daily oral Thalidomide (at 3mg/kg)
* Daily oral Celecoxib (100 mg BID for patients \< 20 kg, 200 mg BID for patients 20-50 kg, and 400 mg BID for patients \> 50 kg)
* Daily oral Cyclophosphamide (2.5 mg/kg/d to a maximum of 100 mg/d) every 21 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

•Thalidomide •Celecoxib •Etoposide •Cyclophosphamide

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Refractory/Progressive non hematopoietic extracranial solid tumors following treatment with at least 2 lines of chemotherapy.
2. ECOG performance status (\<=3)(at least patients ambulating with crutches or on wheel chair)
3. Age: 5-18 years
4. Recovered from all acute toxic effects of earlier therapy
5. Absolute neutrophil count \> 1X 109/L
6. Absolute platelet count \> 75 x 109/L
7. Normal renal functions
8. Serum bilirubin \<1.5 times the upper limit of normal, and the serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase \< 5 times the upper limit of normal.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Uncontrolled concurrent illness or active infection
2. Positive serology for human immunodeficiency.
3. Unable to swallow oral medication
4. Pregnant and breast-feeding
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

All India Institute of Medical Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sameer Bakhshi

Additional Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sameer Bakhshi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

All India Institute of Medical Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

All India Institute of Medical Sciences

New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pramanik R, Agarwala S, Sreenivas V, Dhawan D, Bakhshi S. Quality of life in paediatric solid tumours: a randomised study of metronomic chemotherapy versus placebo. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Jun;13(2):234-237. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002731. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33468507 (View on PubMed)

Pramanik R, Agarwala S, Gupta YK, Thulkar S, Vishnubhatla S, Batra A, Dhawan D, Bakhshi S. Metronomic Chemotherapy vs Best Supportive Care in Progressive Pediatric Solid Malignant Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;3(9):1222-1227. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0324.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28384657 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IEC/NP-63/2013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.