Multidisciplinary Approach Versus Conventional Approach in Colonic Preparation of Hospitalized Patients

NCT ID: NCT01853709

Last Updated: 2013-05-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

162 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Colonoscopy is the gold standard diagnostic procedure for colonic disease. Excellent bowel cleansing is critical for this procedure. However, an inadequate bowel cleansing is a common problem that occurs up to 20% of procedures. This fact has a deep clinical and economical impact. In fact, inadequate bowel preparation is associated to misdiagnosis in 30% of lesions. Moreover several clinical conditions such as cirrhosis, antidepressant drugs, and hospitalized patients are predictive factors of inadequate colonic preparations. These circumstances have promoted multiple clinical trials, however there is no consensus about the optimal strategy for colonic cleansing. Education in colonic preparation has obtained conflicting results. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) and sodium phosphate solutions have been the commonest preparations used with a similar efficacy. However, the large volume to ingest (4 litters) makes PEG compliance difficult. Likewise, sodium phosphate also contains high levels in sodium and phosphate which contraindicate its use in elderly patients and / or with comorbidity. The use of adjuvants such as olive oil and bisacodyl allows reducing the volume of polyethylene glycol thereby improving the tolerance and right colon preparation.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of a multidisciplinary approach (education, fiber free diet, polyethylene glycol (PEG) 2L, and adjuvant bisacodyl + olive oil) vs. a conventional approach (fiber free diet+ PEG 4L in split doses ) in cleaning the colon of hospitalized patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Multidisciplinary approach

The multidisciplinary approach will include:

Education Fiber free diet Bisacodyl: 10 mg 2 days before the procedure, 20 mg the day before the procedure and 10 mg 3 hours before the procedure Adjuvants: Olive Oil:60 mL/Apple Juice: 200 mL PEG: 1 L the night before the procedure and 1 L 3 hours before the procedure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Education

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Fiber free diet

Intervention Type OTHER

Adjuvants

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Polyethylene glycol (PEG)

Intervention Type DRUG

Bisacodyl

Intervention Type DRUG

Conventional approach

The conventional approach will include:

Education Fiber free diet Polyethylene glycol (PEG): 2 L the night before the procedure, 2 L 3 hours before the procedure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Education

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Fiber free diet

Intervention Type OTHER

Polyethylene glycol (PEG)

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Education

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Fiber free diet

Intervention Type OTHER

Adjuvants

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Polyethylene glycol (PEG)

Intervention Type DRUG

Bisacodyl

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Hospitalized patients who undergo a non urgent colonoscopy
* Patients who give informed consent to participate in the study
* Patients older than 18 years
* Patients who undergo total colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

* Non compliance with the 48 hours diet prescribed
* The endoscopy planned is a rectosigmoidoscopy
* Previous colonic surgery
* Mental/cognitive impairment preventing the study assessments
* Severe renal failure
* Electrolytic disbalance(hyponatremia, hypokaliemia, Hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia)
* Intestinal obstruction, perforation or toxic megacolon
* Pregnant or nursing women
* Allergy/intolerance to PEG, bisacodyl or adjuvants
* No informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Corporacion Parc Tauli

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Felix Junquera

Consultant Physician - Gastroenterology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital de Sabadell

Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Félix Junquera, PhD

Role: CONTACT

34937458320

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CSPT-END-DIG-2012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.