Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-03-31
2013-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Titration of Intraoperative PEEP in Patients Undergoing Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
NCT05155371
Mixture Nitrous Oxide - Oxygen 50-50% in Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Guided by Ultrasound
NCT02899182
The Effect of Combined General/Epidural Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia on Diaphragmatic Function
NCT01547416
Lung US for PEEP Optimization in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy or Cystectomy Patients
NCT06307704
The Effect of Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
NCT01402622
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Pharmacokinetic models allow us to make predictions of the results of drug administration. If we know the age and size of the patient, we can determine a quantity of propofol that will attain a desired concentration at some point in the future (within the predictive accuracy of the model). If they are old, this is less than if they are young. If they are obese, this is more than if they are thin. By adjusting the dosing, we can achieve similar concentrations at a specified time in a wide range of patients.
Pharmacodynamic models allow us to relate drug concentration to a probability of response. Sensitivity is a randomly distributed variable, and the cumulative probability of response to propofol is well represented by a sigmoid curve. While we do not know the concentration that will suffice for a given individual, we can determine the probability that this individual will lose responsiveness within an interval of concentrations. For example, the probability of loss of responsiveness between 1 µg/ml and 6 µg/ml is around 99%. For any given age and size, an infusion sequence can be determined so that we traverse this interval smoothly. The infusion sequence is determined by minimization of the difference between the simulated probability and the target (1). We predict that 90% of 50 year old 70 kg patients will lose responsiveness between one minute and three minutes after initiating the infusion, and 99% by five minutes. The infusion sequence for this patient is comprised of a bolus of 287 µg/kg followed by an initial infusion of 216 µg/kg/min, with an increase to 550 µg/kg/min after 147 seconds. By selecting the infusion sequence based on the age and size of the patient, all patients will track the same target line. These infusion rates are determined prior to initiation of sedation, and the clinician can verify that they are appropriate for the patient before beginning sedation.
Once the endpoint of adequate sedation is observed, the effect site concentration associated with this endpoint is inferred, and the infusion that will maintain this concentration can be determined. This allows the clinical observation to be translated into an infusion rate, much as a driver accelerates to a desired speed and then engages the cruise control to maintain that speed.
The intent of this study is to demonstrate equivalent safety and efficacy of PRC to control by a skilled clinician.
References
1\. Mandel JE, Sarraf E. The Variability of Response to Propofol Is Reduced When a Clinical Observation Is Incorporated in the Control: A Simulation Study. Anesthesia \& Analgesia. 2012;114:1221-9.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Monitoring
Standard of care sedation by CRNA using proposal with manual recording of drug dosing
Monitoring
Manual recording of drug doses determined by CRNA
Probability ramp control
Propofol titrated to deep sedation using PRC software.
Probability ramp control
Decision support software that calculates propofol doses appropriate for age and weight of the patient
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Probability ramp control
Decision support software that calculates propofol doses appropriate for age and weight of the patient
Monitoring
Manual recording of drug doses determined by CRNA
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Pennsylvania
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeff E Mandel, MD MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pennsylvania
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Endoscopy Center, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mandel JE, Sarraf E. The variability of response to propofol is reduced when a clinical observation is incorporated in the control: a simulation study. Anesth Analg. 2012 Jun;114(6):1221-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824cb853. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
817166
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.