Transarterial Ethanol Ablation(TEA) for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma(HCC)

NCT ID: NCT01837381

Last Updated: 2019-09-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-02-28

Study Completion Date

2017-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this trial was to evaluate the clinical outcome, treatment toxicity and tumor response of TEA for unresectable HCC.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Transarterial therapy has been playing an important role in the treatment algorithm for patients with multifocal or large intrahepatic lesions not eligible for surgical resection, transplantation, or local ablative therapy. Among the various options of transarterial therapy including chemoembolization (TACE), bland embolization, radioembolization, and TEA, chemoembolization is the only one that has been proven to be of survival benefits versus best supportive care in randomized controlled trials. TEA is a hybrid of bland embolization and chemical ablation. Utilizing a liquid agent of Lipiodol-ethanol mixture consisting of 33% ethanol by volume, TEA offers complete and long lasting embolization of both the arterioles and portal venules supplying the tumor and could possibly be more effective than particulate embolic agents in tumor vessel embolization. The component of ethanol very likely offers synergistic effect to embolization and causes tumor ablation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Transarterial Ethanol Ablation (TEA)

Two treatment sessions at 2 months apart were given and started within 4 weeks after randomization.

Group Type OTHER

TEA

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Arterial feeders to tumors were identified and catheterized with a microcatheter to a branch supplying a Couinaud segment or subsegmental level for delivery of the therapeutic agent, which was Lipiodol-ethanol mixture at 2:1 ratio by volume for TEA (Lipiodol Ultrafluide, Guerbet, France; Dehydrated alcohol \[absolute alcohol\], Martindale Pharmaceuticals, United Kingdom). The agents were delivered under fluoroscopic control to completely fill up the vasculature of all tumors. The maximum total volume of Lipiodol-ethanol mixture or cisplatin emulsion to be delivered in one treatment session was 60 mL.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TEA

Arterial feeders to tumors were identified and catheterized with a microcatheter to a branch supplying a Couinaud segment or subsegmental level for delivery of the therapeutic agent, which was Lipiodol-ethanol mixture at 2:1 ratio by volume for TEA (Lipiodol Ultrafluide, Guerbet, France; Dehydrated alcohol \[absolute alcohol\], Martindale Pharmaceuticals, United Kingdom). The agents were delivered under fluoroscopic control to completely fill up the vasculature of all tumors. The maximum total volume of Lipiodol-ethanol mixture or cisplatin emulsion to be delivered in one treatment session was 60 mL.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Signed informed consent by patient
* Age above 18 years
* Child-Pugh A or B cirrhosis
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) performance score 2 or below
* No serious concurrent medical illness
* No prior treatment or surgery for HCC
* Histologically or cytologically proven HCC except for lesions of size 1 to 2 cm, with typical features of HCC on two dynamic imaging techniques, or lesions larger than 2cm, with typical features on one dynamic imaging techniques, or lesions larger than 2cm with alpha feto protein(AFP) level \> 200 ng/mL
* Unresectable disease without extra-hepatic involvement on chest X-ray(CXR) and CT
* Massive expansive tumor type with measurable lesion on CT
* Total tumor mass \< 50% liver volume
* Tumor size ≤ 15cm in largest dimension
* Tumor number ≤ 5

Exclusion Criteria

* History of prior malignancy except on the condition that the patient has been disease free for ≥ 3 years
* Concurrent ischemic heart disease or heart failure
* History of acute tumor rupture presenting with hemo-peritoneum
* Serum creatinine level \> 180 umol/L
* Biliary obstruction not amenable to percutaneous drainage
* Child-Pugh C cirrhosis
* History of hepatic encephalopathy
* Intractable ascites not controllable by medical therapy
* History of variceal bleeding within last 3 months; serum total bilirubin level ≥ 50 umol/L
* Serum albumin level \< 25g/L
* International normalized ratio(INR) \> 1.5
* Extrahepatic metastasis
* Infiltrative or diffuse tumor
* Tumor number \> 5
* Thrombosis of target hepatic artery
* Partial or complete thrombosis of the main portal vein; tumor invasion of portal branch of contralateral lobe
* Hepatic vein tumor thrombus
* Significant arterio-portal venous shunt
* Significant arterial-hepatic venous shunt
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Simon Yu

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Simon CH Yu, MD, FRCR

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Clinicl Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinsese University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VIR-13-03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.