Study of Liver Resection With Versus Without Hepatic Inflow Occlusion for the HBV-related HCC

NCT ID: NCT02563158

Last Updated: 2016-05-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

114 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2019-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study aims to compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes of liver resection for HBV-related HCC with versus without hepatic inflow occlusion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

High prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) imposes a huge burden of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Asia. Liver resection remains the mainstay of treatment for HCC. Hepatic inflow occlusion, known as the Pringle maneuver, is most commonly used to reduce blood loss during liver parenchymal transection. A major issue about this maneuver is the ischemia-reperfusion injury to the remnant liver. And the hemodynamic disturbance to the tumor-bearing liver remains an oncologic concern. Given the technical advances in living donor liver transplantation, vascular occlusion can be avoided in liver resection by experienced hands. This study aims to compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes of liver resection for HBV-related HCC without versus with hepatic inflow occlusion.

This study will include eligible patients with HBV-related HCC elected for liver resection. 57 patients will be enrolled in each randomized arm to detect a 20% difference in the serum level of total bilirubin on postoperative day 5 (80% power and α = 0.05). The secondary endpoints include procedural parameters, perioperative liver function and inflammatory response, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and long-term outcomes. Patients will be followed for up to five years. Data will be statistically analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

This prospective randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate the feasibility of liver resections for HBV-related HCC without vascular occlusion. Clinical implication of its outcomes may change the present surgical practice and fill the oncologic gaps therein.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Liver Cancer Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hx with hepatic inflow occlusion

Hepatectomy is carried out using Pringle maneuver in cycles of 15 minutes clamping + 5 minutes unclamping of the hepatoduodenal ligament.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Hx with non-occlusion technique

Hepatectomy without hepatic inflow occlusion (non-occlusion technique)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

non-occlusion technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hepatectomy is carried out without hepatic inflow control. (non-occlusion technique)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

non-occlusion technique

Hepatectomy is carried out without hepatic inflow control. (non-occlusion technique)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

hepatectomy without hepatic inflow occlusion

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Elective liver resection due to HBV-related HCC with Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging 0 or A;
2. Child-Pugh classified A with or without cirrhosis, or reversed to A from B after conventional therapy;
3. Tumors located either in the left or right hemiliver;
4. Resection extent was a hemi-hepatectomy or less;
5. Informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Having comorbidity that contraindicates surgery;
2. Participation in concurrent interventional trials with interference to this study;
3. Eligible for laparoscopic hepatectomy;
4. Requiring concomitant procedures, such as digestive, vascular or biliary reconstruction;
5. Lack of compliance for treatment or future follow-up.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese PLA General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Shichun Lu

Director, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shichun Lu, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100853, China

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chinese PLA General Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Shichun Lu, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+86 10 68160801

Yinzhe Xu, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+1 617 818 4081

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yinzhe Xu, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: primary

86-10-66936609

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Llovet JM, Fuster J, Bruix J; Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer Group. The Barcelona approach: diagnosis, staging, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2004 Feb;10(2 Suppl 1):S115-20. doi: 10.1002/lt.20034.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 14762851 (View on PubMed)

Dong JH, Yang SZ, Duan WD, Ji WB, Cai SW, Wang J, Shi XJ, Jiang K, Xia HT, He L, Zhang WZ, Huang XQ, Huang ZQ. [Clinical application of precise liver resection techniques in patients with complicated liver space-occupying lesions]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Nov 1;47(21):1610-5. Chinese.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20137393 (View on PubMed)

Huang ZQ, Xu LN, Yang T, Zhang WZ, Huang XQ, Liu R, Cai SW, Zhang AQ, Feng YQ, Zhou NX, Dong JH. [Liver resection: single center experiences of 2008 consecutive resections in 20 years]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Sep 1;46(17):1314-21. Chinese.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19094562 (View on PubMed)

Dong J, Yang S, Zeng J, Cai S, Ji W, Duan W, Zhang A, Ren W, Xu Y, Tan J, Bu X, Zhang N, Wang X, Wang X, Meng X, Jiang K, Gu W, Huang Z. Precision in liver surgery. Semin Liver Dis. 2013 Aug;33(3):189-203. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351781. Epub 2013 Aug 13. Danish, English.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23943100 (View on PubMed)

Sugiyama Y, Ishizaki Y, Imamura H, Sugo H, Yoshimoto J, Kawasaki S. Effects of intermittent Pringle's manoeuvre on cirrhotic compared with normal liver. Br J Surg. 2010 Jul;97(7):1062-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7039.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20632273 (View on PubMed)

Kim YI, Song KE, Ryeon HK, Hwang YJ, Yun YK, Lee JW, Chun BY. Enhanced inflammatory cytokine production at ischemia/reperfusion in human liver resection. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Jul-Aug;49(46):1077-82.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12143206 (View on PubMed)

Katz SC, Shia J, Liau KH, Gonen M, Ruo L, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, D'Angelica MI, Blumgart LH, Dematteo RP. Operative blood loss independently predicts recurrence and survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):617-23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ed22f.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19300227 (View on PubMed)

Fu SY, Lau WY, Li GG, Tang QH, Li AJ, Pan ZY, Huang G, Yin L, Wu MC, Lai EC, Zhou WP. A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare Pringle maneuver, hemihepatic vascular inflow occlusion, and main portal vein inflow occlusion in partial hepatectomy. Am J Surg. 2011 Jan;201(1):62-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.09.029. Epub 2010 Apr 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20409520 (View on PubMed)

Xu Y, Chen J, Wang H, Zheng H, Feng D, Zhang A, Leng J, Duan W, Yang Z, Chen M, Shi X, Cai S, Ji W, Jiang K, Zhang W, Chen Y, Gu W, Dong J, Lu S. Perioperative and long-term outcomes of liver resection for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma without versus with hepatic inflow occlusion: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Oct 11;17(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1621-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27724929 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NO. 2012BAI06B01

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NO. 2012ZX10002-017

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

JFJZYY-GD-15-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.