Conversion From Parenteral to Oral Methadone.

NCT ID: NCT01836328

Last Updated: 2016-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-08-31

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The majority of current studies regarding the use of methadone (MTD) in the treatment of cancer pain are focused in its administration via the oral route (PO). The ratio considered from VO to parenteral route (BP) is 2:1. Academic literature assumes the ratio from BP to VO to be 1:2. In our unit, we use MTD in the context of ROP and not as the last opioid. If face with a situation where there is a good control of pain with MTD BP, usually we move to VO. We have observed that the traditional ratio tend to produce certain toxicity problems. Because of this, we have proposed a new ratio of conversion from PAR MTD to oral MTD, i.e. 1:1.2

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the different ratios of conversion from MTD VP to MTD PO. To verify the presence of lower toxicity in the ratio 1:1.2 against 1:2 while still maintaining a good control of pain in patients with advanced cancer that are hospitalized in different palliative care units.

METHODOLOGY: Prospective randomized single blind study in patients with cancer pain treated with parenteral MTD and that would move into MTD oral provided there is good control of pain. The patients will be randomly split into two groups: (Group A = ratio 1:1.2 and Group B=ratio 1:2). Patients will be evaluated during the two days before the switch is applied, the day of the change and during the 3 days post-ROP. The patients who display significant toxicity and/or bad analgesic control within the first 72 hours post-ROP will be considered negative cases. The size of the sample required will include 44 patients distributed in balanced groups in order to obtain a size effect of 45% and a statistical power of 80%. The significance level will be 0.05 for two tails.

STATISTIC ANALYSIS: By means of Chi-squared to compare the proportion of Opioid Rotation (OR) failure in both groups of study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Parenteral /oral methadone ratio 1:2

Far advanced cancer patients with cancer pain hospitalized, and treated with PMTD undergo a preliminary 48 hours observation phase.

Blinded evaluators assess pain management and treatment toxicity and determine an OPTIMISED DOSE of parenteral METHADONE (pain control without toxicity) for each patient.

Only patients with a correct control of pain and without significant toxicity throughout this period are eligible for randomization.

INTERVENTION: Patients randomized to this arm will receive the double of OPTIMISED DOSE of parenteral METHADONE, orally every 24h in 3 administrations during the following 3 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Parenteral /oral methadone ratio 1:2

Intervention Type DRUG

See "arm/group descriptions"

Parenteral /oral methadone ratio 1:1.2

Far advanced cancer patients with cancer pain hospitalized, and treated with PMTD undergo a preliminary 48 hours observation phase.

Blinded evaluators assess pain management and treatment toxicity and determine an OPTIMISED DOSE of parenteral METHADONE (pain control without toxicity) for each patient.

Only patients with a correct control of pain and without significant toxicity throughout this period are eligible for randomization.

INTERVENTION: Patients randomized to this arm will receive the following Oral Methadone dose: 20% increase of optimised parenteral methadone dose every 24h in 3 administrations during the following 3 days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Parenteral /oral methadone ratio 1:1.2

Intervention Type DRUG

See "arm/group descriptions"

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Parenteral /oral methadone ratio 1:2

See "arm/group descriptions"

Intervention Type DRUG

Parenteral /oral methadone ratio 1:1.2

See "arm/group descriptions"

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Eptadone (1mg/ml) oral solution Eptadone (1mg/ml) oral solution

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* diagnosis of advanced disease of any type of malignancy;
* \>18 years old at the time of inclusion;
* for inclusion in the screening phase, the patient is a candidate to pass parenteral methadone to oral methadone (MTD) following to the physician criteria.
* for inclusion in the assessment phase should follow: presence of cancer pain controlled with no significant toxicity with MTD VP for 48h. Be considered controlled pain and absence of significant toxicity due to MTD, as the definitions given in the general protocol;

e) signing the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

1. impairment cognitive status that interferes with the assessment;
2. diagnosis of psychiatric disorders at the time of recruitment that alters the ability to evaluate;
3. presence of side effects due to chemotherapy and / or radiotherapy prior to the change of route of administration, taking into account the following two criteria:

* For patients on a protocol of successive cycles of chemotherapy (no change in chemotherapy regimen), having presented side effects due to chemotherapy in the 15 days prior to the change of route of administration as clinically and following the recommendations of the 2011 4th ed Oncomecum of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology and deemed that may interfere with the assessment of the primary endpoint.
* For patients starting a new protocol of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, have submitted side effects due to such treatment in the 28 days prior to the change of route of administration based on clinical judgment and following the recommendations of the Oncomecum 2011 4th ed. of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology and deemed that may interfere with the assessment of the primary endpoint.
4. invasive anesthesic techniques have been made during the 3 days before changing to oral parenteral;
5. patients at agony.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Arnau de Vilanova

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Universitario La Paz

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

JESÚS GONZÁLEZ BARBOTEO

MEDICAL DOCTOR

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

JESÚS GONZÁLEZ-BARBOTEO, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

INSTITUT CATALÀ D'ONCOLOGIA. HOSPITAL DURAN I REYNALS

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institut Català D'Ncologia. Hospital Duran Y Reynals

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Arnau de Vilanova

Lleida, Lleida, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario La Paz

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gonzalez-Barboteo J, Porta-Sales J, Sanchez D, Tuca A, Gomez-Batiste X. Conversion from parenteral to oral methadone. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(3):200-5. doi: 10.1080/15360280802251199.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19042849 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-024092-39

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EC10-133

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RATIOMTD-010810

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Buprenorphine for Cancer Pain
NCT05910190 UNKNOWN PHASE4
PO Methadone Ortho Outpatient
NCT06351215 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE3
Epidural Methadone in Healthy Volunteers
NCT03525509 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1
Study of D-Methadone in Patients With Chronic Pain
NCT00588640 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2