Multicenter Prospective Study of Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis (TOPAS Study)

NCT ID: NCT01835028

Last Updated: 2021-09-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

320 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-06-30

Study Completion Date

2024-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Low-flow, low-gradient (LF-LG) aortic stenosis (AS) may occur with depressed (i.e. Classical LF; CLF) or preserved (i.e. Paradoxical LF; PLF) LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and both situations are amongst the most challenging encountered in patients with valvular heart disease. Although, CLF-LG AS is recognized has an important clinical entity, current ACC/AHA-ESC guidelines however do not provide precise recommendations for clinical management of these patients . PLF-LG AS is a new entity recently described by our group, which is characterized by more pronounced LV concentric remodeling with smaller LV cavity size and a restrictive physiology leading to impaired LV filling, altered myocardial function, and a low-flow state. Up to recently, this entity was often misdiagnosed, leading to underestimation of AS severity and inappropriate delays for aortic valve replacement surgery (SAVR). The two main challenges in patients with CLF- or PLF- LG AS are to distinguish between a true-severe (TS) versus a pseudo-severe (PS) stenosis and to accurately quantify the extent of myocardial impairment. Unfortunately, the traditional resting and stress echocardiographic parameters currently used to assess the severity of valvular and myocardial dysfunction in patients with LF-LG AS are far from being optimal, and as a consequence, quantification of disease severity and therapeutic management may not be appropriate in a substantial proportion of these patients.

THE GENERAL OBJECTIVES of the TOPAS study are to develop and validate new parameters and biomarkers to improve the assessment of stenosis severity and myocardial impairment, the risk-stratification, and the clinical decision making in patients with LF-LG AS and to assess the impact of the different therapeutic strategies on patient outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Low-flow, low-gradient (LF-LG) aortic stenosis (AS) may occur with depressed (i.e. Classical LF; CLF) or preserved (i.e. Paradoxical LF; PLF) LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and both situations are amongst the most challenging encountered in patients with valvular heart disease. Although, CLF-LG AS is recognized has an important clinical entity, current ACC/AHA-ESC guidelines however do not provide precise recommendations for clinical management of these patients because there is an important lack of data on this condition. PLF-LG AS is a new entity recently described by our group, which is characterized by more pronounced LV concentric remodeling with smaller LV cavity size and a restrictive physiology leading to impaired LV filling, altered myocardial function, and a low-flow state. Up to recently, this entity was often misdiagnosed, leading to underestimation of AS severity and inappropriate delays for aortic valve replacement surgery (SAVR). The two main challenges in patients with CLF- or PLF- LG AS are to distinguish between a true-severe (TS) versus a pseudo-severe (PS) stenosis and to accurately quantify the extent of myocardial impairment. Unfortunately, the traditional resting and stress echocardiographic parameters currently used to assess the severity of valvular and myocardial dysfunction in patients with LF-LG AS are far from being optimal, and as a consequence, quantification of disease severity and therapeutic management may not be appropriate in a substantial proportion of these patients. Furthermore, it remains uncertain which is the optimal timing and mode of treatment (SAVR vs. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation \[TAVI\] vs. Medical) for the different subsets of patients with LF-LG AS patients (CLF- vs. PLF- LG AS; TS vs. PS AS; absence vs. presence of myocardial contractile reserve etc.) THE GENERAL OBJECTIVES of the TOPAS study are to develop and validate new parameters and biomarkers to improve the assessment of stenosis severity and myocardial impairment, the risk-stratification, and the clinical decision making in patients with LF-LG AS and to assess the impact of the different therapeutic strategies on patient outcomes.

THE SPECIFIC AIMS of the phase III of the TOPAS study are: (1) To obtain and analyze the parameters of stenosis severity and LV functional impairment measured by stress echocardiography (SE), the degree of valvular calcification measured by multidetector computed tomography (CT), the extent of myocardial fibrosis measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the blood levels of natriuretic peptides and markers of extracellular matrix (ECM) turn-over, and the occurrence of clinical events in a series of 310 patients with CLF-LG AS (210 in TOPAS- I and II + 100 in TOPAS-III) and in a series of 380 patients with PLF-LG AS (80 in TOPAS II + 300 in TOPAS-III). (2) To measure the weight and calcification of the valves explanted from the patients who will undergo SAVR during follow-up in order to corroborate the actual severity of the stenosis. (3) To assess the usefulness of: i) the projected aortic valve area measured by SE to separate TS from PS AS and predict outcomes in PLF-LG AS; ii) the amount of valvular calcium measured by CT to separate TS from PS AS and predict outcomes in CLF- and PLF- LG AS; iii) the myocardial contractile reserve measured by SE, the extent of myocardial fibrosis measured by MRI, and the plasma levels of BNP and ECM biomarkers to predict operative (SAVR) / procedural (TAVI) risk as well as hemodynamic (LV function), functional (DASI and 6-min walk test distance), and clinical (morbidity-mortality) outcomes in CLF- and PLF- LG AS. (4) To compare the different modes of treatment (SAVR, TAVI, Medical), with respect to hemodynamic, functional, and clinical outcomes.

RELEVANCE OF THE STUDY: There have been very few prospective studies performed until now in patients with LF-LG AS and these studies have included a relatively small number of patients, have often used only one imaging modality (Doppler-echo) and a limited number of biomarkers, and they have generally not included the patients with PLF-LG AS. Our prospective study is the first of its kind, as it will use a complementary multimodality imaging approach and it will measure prospectively conventional parameters of disease severity as well as new emerging parameters and biomarkers developed by our team in large prospective series of patients with CLF- and PLF- LG AS. This study shall contribute to improve the diagnostic evaluation and clinical conduct in patients with LF-LG AS. This new knowledge will lead to the establishment of clinical guidelines for the management of these high-risk patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Classical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient AS

Observational study in patients with Classical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Low LV Ejection Fraction undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, or conservative management:

I- Baseline visit: Medical history, physical / functional evaluation, blood biomarkers, resting echocardiography, stress echocardiography, aortic valve calcium scoring by computed tomography, myocardial fibrosis by magnetic resonance imaging II- Follow-up: clinical outcomes, physical / functional evaluation, echocardiography, blood biomarkers

Echocardiography

Intervention Type OTHER

Observational Study using Imaging and Biomarkers

Computed tomography

Intervention Type OTHER

Observational Study using Imaging and Biomarkers

Magnetic resonance imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

Observational Study using Imaging and Biomarkers

Blood biomarkers

Intervention Type OTHER

Observational Study using Imaging and Biomarkers

Stress echocardiography

Intervention Type OTHER

Observational Study using Imaging and Biomarkers

Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient AS

Observational study in patients with Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Preserved LV Ejection Fraction undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, or conservative management:

I- Baseline visit: Medical history, physical / functional evaluation, blood biomarkers, resting echocardiography, stress echocardiography, aortic valve calcium scoring by computed tomography, myocardial fibrosis by magnetic resonance imaging II- Follow-up: clinical outcomes, physical / functional evaluation, echocardiography, blood biomarkers

Echocardiography

Intervention Type OTHER

Observational Study using Imaging and Biomarkers

Computed tomography

Intervention Type OTHER

Observational Study using Imaging and Biomarkers

Magnetic resonance imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

Observational Study using Imaging and Biomarkers

Blood biomarkers

Intervention Type OTHER

Observational Study using Imaging and Biomarkers

Stress echocardiography

Intervention Type OTHER

Observational Study using Imaging and Biomarkers

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Echocardiography

Observational Study using Imaging and Biomarkers

Intervention Type OTHER

Computed tomography

Observational Study using Imaging and Biomarkers

Intervention Type OTHER

Magnetic resonance imaging

Observational Study using Imaging and Biomarkers

Intervention Type OTHER

Blood biomarkers

Observational Study using Imaging and Biomarkers

Intervention Type OTHER

Stress echocardiography

Observational Study using Imaging and Biomarkers

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* LVEF≤ 40%
* Indexed aortic valve area (AVA) ≤ 0.6 cm²/m²
* Mean transvalvular gradient \< 40 mmHg

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant or lactating women
* advanced renal failure
* tumor with metastasis
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Brest

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Laval University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Philippe Pibarot

Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Viena General Hospital

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status RECRUITING

CHU Start Tilman

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Ottawa Heart Institute University

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec

Québec, , Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver

Vancouver, , Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Hôpital La Timone

Marseille, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hôpital Bichat

Paris, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

CHU, Rennes

Rennes, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University Hospital

Münster, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Austria Belgium Canada France Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Philippe Pibarot, DVM, PHD

Role: CONTACT

418-656-8711 ext. 5938

Abdellaziz Dahou, MD

Role: CONTACT

418-656-8711 ext. 3239

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Maurice Sarano

Role: primary

Joao Cavalcante

Role: primary

Gerald Mundigler

Role: primary

Patrizio Lancellotti

Role: primary

Ian Burwash

Role: primary

Philippe Pibarot, DVM, PHD

Role: primary

418-656-8711 ext. 5938

Abdellaziz Dahou, MD

Role: backup

418-656-8711 ext. 3239

Jonathon Leipsic

Role: primary

Gilbert Habib

Role: primary

David Messika-Zeitoun

Role: primary

Erwan Donal

Role: primary

Helmut Baumgartner

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2003 Aug 26;108(8):983-8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000085167.67105.32. Epub 2003 Aug 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12912812 (View on PubMed)

Mohty D, Dumesnil JG, Echahidi N, Mathieu P, Dagenais F, Voisine P, Pibarot P. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jan 6;53(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19118723 (View on PubMed)

Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, Pibarot P. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation. 2007 Jun 5;115(22):2856-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681. Epub 2007 May 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17533183 (View on PubMed)

Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P. Usefulness of the valvuloarterial impedance to predict adverse outcome in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 8;54(11):1003-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.079.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19729117 (View on PubMed)

Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 6;60(19):1845-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.051. Epub 2012 Oct 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23062546 (View on PubMed)

Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P, Carabello B. Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Eur Heart J. 2010 Feb;31(3):281-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp361. Epub 2009 Sep 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19737801 (View on PubMed)

Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P. Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity: new challenges, new solutions. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Sep;24(9):992-4. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.07.011. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21867870 (View on PubMed)

Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: when the gradient does not fit with the valve area. Heart. 2010 Sep;96(18):1431-3. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.195149. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20813724 (View on PubMed)

Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis adding new pieces to the puzzle. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jul 19;58(4):413-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.057. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21757119 (View on PubMed)

Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Improving assessment of aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 17;60(3):169-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.078.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22789881 (View on PubMed)

Picano E, Pibarot P, Lancellotti P, Monin JL, Bonow RO. The emerging role of exercise testing and stress echocardiography in valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Dec 8;54(24):2251-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.046.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19958961 (View on PubMed)

Rodriguez-Gabella T, Nombela-Franco L, Auffret V, Asmarats L, Islas F, Maes F, Ferreira-Neto AN, Paradis JM, Dumont E, Cote M, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Macaya C, Pibarot P, Rodes-Cabau J. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 15;122(4):625-632. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.04.044. Epub 2018 May 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30064863 (View on PubMed)

Annabi MS, Clisson M, Clavel MA, Pibarot P. Workup and Management of Patients With Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 May 2;20(6):49. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0642-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29721704 (View on PubMed)

Ribeiro HB, Lerakis S, Gilard M, Cavalcante JL, Makkar R, Herrmann HC, Windecker S, Enriquez-Sarano M, Cheema AN, Nombela-Franco L, Amat-Santos I, Munoz-Garcia AJ, Garcia Del Blanco B, Zajarias A, Lisko JC, Hayek S, Babaliaros V, Le Ven F, Gleason TG, Chakravarty T, Szeto WY, Clavel MA, de Agustin A, Serra V, Schindler JT, Dahou A, Puri R, Pelletier-Beaumont E, Cote M, Pibarot P, Rodes-Cabau J. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: The TOPAS-TAVI Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 27;71(12):1297-1308. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.054.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29566812 (View on PubMed)

Annabi MS, Touboul E, Dahou A, Burwash IG, Bergler-Klein J, Enriquez-Sarano M, Orwat S, Baumgartner H, Mascherbauer J, Mundigler G, Cavalcante JL, Larose E, Pibarot P, Clavel MA. Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography for Management of Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Feb 6;71(5):475-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.052.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29406851 (View on PubMed)

Dahou A, Clavel MA, Dumesnil JG, Capoulade R, Ribeiro HB, O'Connor K, Mathieu P, Beaudoin J, Larose E, Rodes-Cabau J, Pibarot P. Impact of AVR on LV Remodeling and Function in Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Preserved LVEF. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jan;10(1):88-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Nov 9. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27838305 (View on PubMed)

Dahou A, Toubal O, Clavel MA, Beaudoin J, Magne J, Mathieu P, Philippon F, Dumesnil JG, Puri R, Ribeiro HB, Larose E, Rodes-Cabau J, Pibarot P. Relationship Between QT Interval and Outcome in Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Oct 20;5(10):e003980. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003980.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27792655 (View on PubMed)

Dahou A, Clavel MA, Capoulade R, Bartko PE, Magne J, Mundigler G, Bergler-Klein J, Burwash I, Mascherbauer J, Ribeiro HB, O'Connor K, Baumgartner H, Senechal M, Dumesnil JG, Rosenhek R, Mathieu P, Larose E, Rodes-Cabau J, Pibarot P. Right ventricular longitudinal strain for risk stratification in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with low ejection fraction. Heart. 2016 Apr;102(7):548-54. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308309. Epub 2016 Jan 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26762240 (View on PubMed)

Dayan V, Vignolo G, Magne J, Clavel MA, Mohty D, Pibarot P. Outcome and Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Preserved LVEF and Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 15;66(23):2594-2603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.076.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26670058 (View on PubMed)

Le Ven F, Thebault C, Dahou A, Ribeiro HB, Capoulade R, Mahjoub H, Urena M, Nombela-Franco L, Allende Carrera R, Clavel MA, Dumont E, Dumesnil J, De Larochelliere R, Rodes-Cabau J, Pibarot P. Evolution and prognostic impact of low flow after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Heart. 2015 Aug;101(15):1196-203. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307067. Epub 2015 May 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25999587 (View on PubMed)

Dahou A, Magne J, Clavel MA, Capoulade R, Bartko PE, Bergler-Klein J, Senechal M, Mundigler G, Burwash I, Ribeiro HB, O'Connor K, Mathieu P, Baumgartner H, Dumesnil JG, Rosenhek R, Larose E, Rodes-Cabau J, Pibarot P. Tricuspid Regurgitation Is Associated With Increased Risk of Mortality in Patients With Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Results of the Multicenter TOPAS Study (True or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):588-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.08.019. Epub 2015 Mar 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25819185 (View on PubMed)

Dahou A, Bartko PE, Capoulade R, Clavel MA, Mundigler G, Grondin SL, Bergler-Klein J, Burwash I, Dumesnil JG, Senechal M, O'Connor K, Baumgartner H, Pibarot P. Usefulness of global left ventricular longitudinal strain for risk stratification in low ejection fraction, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results from the multicenter True or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;8(3):e002117. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002117.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25681417 (View on PubMed)

Clavel MA, Berthelot-Richer M, Le Ven F, Capoulade R, Dahou A, Dumesnil JG, Mathieu P, Pibarot P. Impact of classic and paradoxical low flow on survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Feb 24;65(7):645-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.047.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25677424 (View on PubMed)

Mohty D, Boulogne C, Magne J, Pibarot P, Echahidi N, Cornu E, Dumesnil J, Laskar M, Virot P, Aboyans V. Prevalence and long-term outcome of aortic prosthesis-patient mismatch in patients with paradoxical low-flow severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2014 Sep 9;130(11 Suppl 1):S25-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007819.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25200051 (View on PubMed)

Clavel MA, Cote N, Mathieu P, Dumesnil JG, Audet A, Pepin A, Couture C, Fournier D, Trahan S, Page S, Pibarot P. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: new insights from weights of operatively excised aortic valves. Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 7;35(38):2655-62. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu152. Epub 2014 Apr 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24755006 (View on PubMed)

Mohty D, Magne J, Deltreuil M, Aboyans V, Echahidi N, Cassat C, Pibarot P, Laskar M, Virot P. Outcome and impact of surgery in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a cardiac catheterization study. Circulation. 2013 Sep 10;128(11 Suppl 1):S235-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000031.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24030412 (View on PubMed)

Le Ven F, Freeman M, Webb J, Clavel MA, Wheeler M, Dumont E, Thompson C, De Larochelliere R, Moss R, Doyle D, Ribeiro HB, Urena M, Nombela-Franco L, Rodes-Cabau J, Pibarot P. Impact of low flow on the outcome of high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Aug 27;62(9):782-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.044. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23770162 (View on PubMed)

Clavel MA, Ennezat PV, Marechaux S, Dumesnil JG, Capoulade R, Hachicha Z, Mathieu P, Bellouin A, Bergeron S, Meimoun P, Arsenault M, Le Tourneau T, Pasquet A, Couture C, Pibarot P. Stress echocardiography to assess stenosis severity and predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Feb;6(2):175-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.10.015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23489531 (View on PubMed)

Williams TE, O'Day DM, Head WS, Robinson RD. Measurements of antifungal levels in corneal tissue: a simplified bioassay for amphotericin B. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1990;228(6):538-40. doi: 10.1007/BF00918487.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2265769 (View on PubMed)

Clavel MA, Burwash IG, Mundigler G, Dumesnil JG, Baumgartner H, Bergler-Klein J, Senechal M, Mathieu P, Couture C, Beanlands R, Pibarot P. Validation of conventional and simplified methods to calculate projected valve area at normal flow rate in patients with low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (True or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Apr;23(4):380-6. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.02.002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20362927 (View on PubMed)

Blais C, Burwash IG, Mundigler G, Dumesnil JG, Loho N, Rader F, Baumgartner H, Beanlands RS, Chayer B, Kadem L, Garcia D, Durand LG, Pibarot P. Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. Circulation. 2006 Feb 7;113(5):711-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.557678.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16461844 (View on PubMed)

Clavel MA, Webb JG, Rodes-Cabau J, Masson JB, Dumont E, De Larochelliere R, Doyle D, Bergeron S, Baumgartner H, Burwash IG, Dumesnil JG, Mundigler G, Moss R, Kempny A, Bagur R, Bergler-Klein J, Gurvitch R, Mathieu P, Pibarot P. Comparison between transcatheter and surgical prosthetic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Circulation. 2010 Nov 9;122(19):1928-36. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.929893. Epub 2010 Oct 25.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20975002 (View on PubMed)

Clavel MA, Fuchs C, Burwash IG, Mundigler G, Dumesnil JG, Baumgartner H, Bergler-Klein J, Beanlands RS, Mathieu P, Magne J, Pibarot P. Predictors of outcomes in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results of the multicenter TOPAS Study. Circulation. 2008 Sep 30;118(14 Suppl):S234-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.757427.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18824760 (View on PubMed)

Bergler-Klein J, Mundigler G, Pibarot P, Burwash IG, Dumesnil JG, Blais C, Fuchs C, Mohty D, Beanlands RS, Hachicha Z, Walter-Publig N, Rader F, Baumgartner H. B-type natriuretic peptide in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: relationship to hemodynamics and clinical outcome: results from the Multicenter Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis (TOPAS) study. Circulation. 2007 Jun 5;115(22):2848-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.654210. Epub 2007 May 21.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17515464 (View on PubMed)

Burwash IG, Lortie M, Pibarot P, de Kemp RA, Graf S, Mundigler G, Khorsand A, Blais C, Baumgartner H, Dumesnil JG, Hachicha Z, DaSilva J, Beanlands RS. Myocardial blood flow in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: differences between true and pseudo-severe aortic stenosis. Results from the multicentre TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. Heart. 2008 Dec;94(12):1627-33. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.135475. Epub 2008 Apr 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18381378 (View on PubMed)

Clavel MA, Webb JG, Pibarot P, Altwegg L, Dumont E, Thompson C, De Larochelliere R, Doyle D, Masson JB, Bergeron S, Bertrand OF, Rodes-Cabau J. Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 May 19;53(20):1883-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.060.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19442889 (View on PubMed)

Clavel MA, Rodes-Cabau J, Dumont E, Bagur R, Bergeron S, De Larochelliere R, Doyle D, Larose E, Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P. Validation and characterization of transcatheter aortic valve effective orifice area measured by Doppler echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Oct;4(10):1053-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.06.021.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21999863 (View on PubMed)

Clavel MA, Dumesnil JG, Capoulade R, Mathieu P, Senechal M, Pibarot P. Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 2;60(14):1259-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.054. Epub 2012 May 30.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22657269 (View on PubMed)

Galli E, Le Ven F, Coisne A, Sportouch C, Le Tourneau T, Lavie-Badie Y, Bernard A, Eicher JC, Dreyfus J, Ternacle J, Baleynaud S, Auffret V, Le Pabic E, Pibarot P, Oger E, Donal E. Randomised study for the Optimal Treatment of symptomatic patients with low-gradient severe Aortic valve Stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (ROTAS trial). Heart. 2024 Sep 25;110(20):1223-1230. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324224.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39209438 (View on PubMed)

Annabi MS, Cote N, Dahou A, Bartko PE, Bergler-Klein J, Burwash IG, Orwat S, Baumgartner H, Mascherbauer J, Mundigler G, Fukui M, Cavalcante J, Ribeiro HB, Rodes-Cabau J, Clavel MA, Pibarot P. Comparison of Early Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Management in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting: Results From the TOPAS Prospective Observational Cohort Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Dec 15;9(24):e017870. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017870. Epub 2020 Dec 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33289422 (View on PubMed)

Dahou A, Clavel MA, Capoulade R, O'Connor K, Ribeiro HB, Cote N, Le Ven F, Rodes-Cabau J, Dumesnil JG, Mathieu P, Pibarot P. B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin for Risk Stratification in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: A Substudy of the TOPAS Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jul;11(7):939-947. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28917673 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MOP-57745

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

OpSens PRIME CLASS
NCT05070130 TERMINATED
VALVOSOFT® Pivotal Study
NCT05235568 COMPLETED NA
The COMPLETE Study
NCT06205810 RECRUITING