The Effect of Tight Glycemic Control on Surgical Site Infection Rates in Patients Undergoing Open Heart Surgery

NCT ID: NCT01831154

Last Updated: 2017-04-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

37 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-05-31

Study Completion Date

2011-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of three different glycemic treatment conditions (tight, conventional, and standard) in the intraoperative period on: 1) postoperative surgical site infections, and 2) postoperative procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein levels in patients undergoing open-heart surgery. Secondary aims of the study were to investigate the effects of the three glycemic treatment conditions on: 1) intraoperative blood glucose; 2) intraoperative glycemic stability; and 3) intensive care unit length of stay, in patients undergoing open-heart surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

An experimental design with a multilevel, single factor, within-subjects design was utilized. Patients were nested within anesthesia provider teams. The design was counterbalanced by means of a Latin square, where each of three anesthesia provider teams dispensed each of three glycemic treatment conditions once.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Hyperglycemia Surgical Site Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tight Glycemic Group

The tight glycemic group received a continuous intravenous infusion of regular insulin in the intraoperative period titrated per a modified Portland Protocol from Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Tennessee. The initial bolus of insulin and insulin infusion was initiated prior to induction of anesthesia if the morning blood glucose was greater than 149 mg/dl or any time intraoperatively the blood glucose elevated above 149 mg/dl.The titration of insulin for the tight glycemic group maintained blood glucose levels between 110-149 mg/dl throughout the intraoperative period. The intraoperative blood glucose was titrated to blood glucose levels sampled every 30 minutes.Upon transfer to the intensive care unit the protocol ended and all subjects received the same glycemic control.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tight Glycemic

Intervention Type DRUG

The insulin infusion consisted of 100 units of regular insulin in 100 ml of normal saline.

Conventional Glycemic Group

The conventional glycemic group received a continuous intravenous infusion of regular insulin in the intraoperative period titrated per a modified Portland Protocol from Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Tennessee. The initial insulin bolus and infusion was initiated prior to induction of anesthesia if the morning blood glucose was greater than 180 mg/dl or any time intraoperatively that the blood glucose elevated above 180 mg/dl. The insulin infusion was titrated throughout the intraoperative period to maintain blood glucose levels between 150-180 mg/dl.The intraoperative blood glucose was titrated to blood glucose levels sampled every 30 minutes. Upon transfer to the ICU the intraoperative protocol ended and all subjects received the standardized glycemic control for the ICU.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Conventional Glycemic

Intervention Type DRUG

The insulin infusion consisted of 100 units of regular insulin in 100 ml of normal saline.

Standard Glycemic Group

The standard glycemic group received intravenous injections of regular insulin in the intraoperative period titrated per the usual care protocol utilized at the study site. The initial bolus of insulin was initiated prior to induction of anesthesia if the morning blood glucose is greater than 180 mg/dl or any time intraoperatively that the blood glucose rises above 180 mg/dl. The intraoperative blood glucose was titrated to blood glucose levels sampled every 30 minutes.Upon transfer to the ICU the intraoperative protocol ended and all subjects received the standardized glycemic control for the ICU.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Standard Glycemic

Intervention Type DRUG

Insulin was Regular Insulin administered intravenous bolus.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tight Glycemic

The insulin infusion consisted of 100 units of regular insulin in 100 ml of normal saline.

Intervention Type DRUG

Conventional Glycemic

The insulin infusion consisted of 100 units of regular insulin in 100 ml of normal saline.

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard Glycemic

Insulin was Regular Insulin administered intravenous bolus.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* over the age of 21
* on cardiopulmonary bypass or off cardiopulmonary
* elective or urgent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery
* CABG with or without combined valve surgery
* valve surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* chronically immunosuppressed
* suffered from end-stage organ disease
* currently had active infections
* underwent emergent or salvage CABG surgery
* had an implanted insulin pump
* were in another interventional clinical trial.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of South Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sierra Gower

Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sierra A Gower, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

James A Haley VAH

Theresa Beckie, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of South Florida

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

James A. Haley VAH

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

106219

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Glucose Control in Open Heart Surgery
NCT00370643 COMPLETED PHASE1
SGLT2 Inhibitors and Perioperative Period
NCT06326528 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Prevention and Treatment of Common Hyperglycemia in Surgery
NCT06624956 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE4