The Comparison of Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Three Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy

NCT ID: NCT01816568

Last Updated: 2013-03-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-02-28

Study Completion Date

2013-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Laparoscopic techniques have allowed surgeons to perform complicated intrabdominal surgery with minimal trauma. In numerous studies, when conventional laparoscopic appendectomy using 3 ports is compared with open appendectomy, it has advantages of reduced pain, reduced hospital stay, and enhanced cosmetic effects. Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) was developed with the aim of reducing the invasiveness of conventional laparoscopy. In this study the investigators aimed to compare results of SILS appendectomy and three port conventional laparoscopic appendectomy prospectively.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Total of 50 patients who undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis will randomly assign to undergo SILS appendectomy group (n = 25) or Three port laparoscopic appendectomy group (n= 25) according to a computer-generated table of random numbers. Demographics (ie, age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, need for conversion to a standard or three port laparoscopic appendectomy, need for conversion to an open appendectomy will be recorded. Outcome measures include operative morbidity, operative time, pain score, hospital stay. Morbidity will be evaluated by rates of colonic leak, wound infection, intrabdominal abscess hospital readmission, and hernia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Appendicitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

SILS appendectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SILS appendectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Single incision laparoscopic appendectomy will be performed

Group 2

Three port laparoscopic appendectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Three port laparoscopic appendectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Three port laparoscopic appendectomy will be performed

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SILS appendectomy

Single incision laparoscopic appendectomy will be performed

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Three port laparoscopic appendectomy

Three port laparoscopic appendectomy will be performed

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Required laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disease.

Exclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) more than III,
* Patients had prior abdominal surgery,
* Pregnancy,
* Ongoing peritoneal dialysis,
* Lack of written informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maltepe University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

manuk norayk manukyan

Assoc.Prof.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ugur Deveci, Assoc.Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maltepe University School of Medicine, General Surgery Department

Fatih Altintoprak, Assoc.Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sakarya University School of Medicine, General Surgery Department

Manuk Norayk Manukyan, Assoc.Prof.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Maltepe University School of Medicine, General Surgery Department

Sertan Kapakli, Assoc.Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maltepe University School of Medicine, General Surgery Department

Abut Kebudi, Prof.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Maltepe University School of Medicine, General Surgery Department

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

mütf4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy:
NCT04107909 UNKNOWN NA
3-midline-ports Cholecystectomy
NCT01378819 COMPLETED PHASE3