Onset Time of Brachial Plexus Block Using Local Anaesthetic Diluted With 0.9% Saline vs 5% Dextrose

NCT ID: NCT01815944

Last Updated: 2013-03-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

55 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-12-31

Study Completion Date

2012-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Regional anesthesia employs the use of local anesthetics (LA) to block specific nerves to enable pain free surgery to be performed, or for intra and post operative pain relief. Dilution of local anesthetics with normal saline (NS) is a common practice to enable larger volumes of LA to be given, for example, in instances where multiple nerve blocks are needed to be performed for optimal pain relief while avoiding toxic doses.

A high sodium concentration is known to antagonize the analgesic effect of local anesthetics. 5% dextrose (D5W) on the other hand is painless on injection and does not cause any long-term effects in animals or humans when injected around neurological tissue. In the literature, only one study using dextrose 5% as diluent to produce 0.5% ropivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block showed a statistically significant reduction in the onset time for sensory blockade when compared with dilution with NS.

In this study, 0.5% ropivacaine diluted with D5W or NS is used for ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block, and the time for complete sensory and motor blockade was compared. 0.5% ropivacaine is easily diluted and is a common concentration used at our centre for nerve blocks. The aim of this study is to assess if 0.5% ropivacaine diluted with D5W results in a shorter onset time for sensory block which may change the current practice of dilution with NS

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

* Patients randomly assigned to receive either 0.5% ropivacaine diluted with NS or D5W.
* Randomization followed a computer-generated randomization table and patients are blinded as to their group allocation.
* Group allocations are concealed in a sealed opaque envelope and only known to an independent anaesthesia trainee who prepares 20mls 0.5% ropivacaine
* The anaesthesiologist involved in the performance of the supraclavicular brachial plexus block is blinded to group allocation
* All ultrasound-guided supraclavicular blocks are performed by 2 anaesthesiologists who are familiar with the technique.
* A trained anaesthesiology trainee who is blinded to group allocation evaluated sensory loss and motor blockade every 5 mins after injection of local anaesthetic.
* The extent of sensory loss is tested in the median, radial, ulnar, and musculocutaneous nerve distributions and evaluated using a 3-point score: 2 = normal sensation, 1 =loss of sensation to pinprick (ie, analgesia), or 0 = loss of sensation to light touch (ie, anesthesia). The extent of motor blockade is tested in the distribution of the radial (thumb abduction), ulnar (thumb adduction), musculocutaneous (flexion of the elbow in supination and pronation), and median nerves (thumb opposition) and evaluated using a 3-point scale where 2 = normal movement, 1 = paresis, and 0 = absent movement.
* Block success is defined as loss of sensation to pinprick (sensory score 1) in each of the radial, ulnar, median, and musculocutaneous nerve distributions measured 60 mins after the end of local anaesthetic injection. Patients in whom block success was not achieved after 60 mins were excluded from data analysis.
* During the postoperative recovery period, pain (verbal response score 4 or patient request for analgesic) is treated with IV tramadol 25-50 mg slow bolus with or without fentanyl 25mcg boluses every 5 minutes as needed.
* When oral intake is allowed, patients will receive oral paracetamol 1g with oral diclofenac 50 mg or celecoxib 200mg, if not contraindicated.
* The block duration is subsequently taken as time from complete analgesia to the time when the patient first feels the slightest pain from the operative site.
* Patients are followed up twice; once on post-operative day (POD) 1 and once between POD 7-10.
* They are seen in the ward or are contacted via telephone and asked for the presence of any pain, weakness, numbness, tingling, or any abnormal sensation in the operative extremity.
* If indicated, they are then told to come to hospital for further evaluation and management as necessary.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Comparison of Onset Time

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

0.75% Ropivacaine and normal saline

Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block using 0.75% ropivacaine diluted with normal saline

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

0.75% Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

0.75% ropivacaine and dextrose 5%

Ultrasound guided supraclavicular block using 0.75% ropivacaine diluted with dextrose 5%

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

0.75% Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Dextrose 5%

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

0.75% Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Dextrose 5%

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Naropin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA I to III
* elective or emergency surgery of the hand, forearm and elbow

Exclusion Criteria

* diabetes mellitus
* neurological deficit
* contraindications to supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade
* unable to give consent
* patient refusal
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Malaya

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Mohd Shahnaz

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

M. Shahnaz Hasan, MBBS, M Anes

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Malaya

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Malaya Medical Centre

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Malaysia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UMMC883.11

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.