ICARuS Post-operative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (EPIC) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) After Optimal Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) for Neoplasms of the Appendix, Colon or Rectum With Isolated Peritoneal Metastasis

NCT ID: NCT01815359

Last Updated: 2026-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

292 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-31

Study Completion Date

2026-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is the first randomized trial comparing Early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for appendiceal and colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study is to find out what effects, good and/or bad, EPIC and HIPEC after cytoreductive surgery have on the patient and the appendiceal, rectal or colon cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Appendix Cancer Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

After the initial 212 patients are accrued, the final 70 patients will be accrued to only the appendiceal cohorts
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Appendiceal, no chemotherapy within 6 months prior to surgery

First, patients will be stratified by previous systemic chemotherapy and by the organ of origin as determined by the PI or Co-PI.

1. Exposure to chemotherapy in the prior 6 months vs. no such exposure
2. Appendix vs. Colon or Rectum Then, patients will be randomly assigned in the operating room, by envelope, to either HIPEC (Group A) or EPIC (Group B) after the operating surgeon determines that the patient is optimally cytoreduced to nodules no greater than 2.5mm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cytoreductive Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Optimal Surgical Debulking

HIPEC with Mitomycin-C

Intervention Type DRUG

EPIC with FUDR and Leucovorin

Intervention Type DRUG

Appendiceal, chemotherapy within 6 months prior to surgery

First, patients will be stratified by previous systemic chemotherapy and by the organ of origin as determined by the PI or Co-PI.

1. Exposure to chemotherapy in the prior 6 months vs. no such exposure
2. Appendix vs. Colon or Rectum • Then, patients will be randomly assigned in the operating room, by envelope, to either HIPEC (Group A) or EPIC (Group B) after the operating surgeon determines that the patient is optimally cytoreduced to nodules no greater than 2.5mm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cytoreductive Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Optimal Surgical Debulking

HIPEC with Mitomycin-C

Intervention Type DRUG

EPIC with FUDR and Leucovorin

Intervention Type DRUG

Colorectal, no chemotherapy within 6 months prior to surgery

First, patients will be stratified by previous systemic chemotherapy and by the organ of origin as determined by the PI or Co-PI.

1. Exposure to chemotherapy in the prior 6 months vs. no such exposure
2. Appendix vs. Colon or Rectum • Then, patients will be randomly assigned in the operating room, by envelope, to either HIPEC (Group A) or EPIC (Group B) after the operating surgeon determines that the patient is optimally cytoreduced to nodules no greater than 2.5mm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cytoreductive Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Optimal Surgical Debulking

HIPEC with Mitomycin-C

Intervention Type DRUG

EPIC with FUDR and Leucovorin

Intervention Type DRUG

Colorectal, chemotherapy within 6 months prior to surgery

First, patients will be stratified by previous systemic chemotherapy and by the organ of origin as determined by the PI or Co-PI.

1. Exposure to chemotherapy in the prior 6 months vs. no such exposure
2. Appendix vs. Colon or Rectum • Then, patients will be randomly assigned in the operating room, by envelope, to either HIPEC (Group A) or EPIC (Group B) after the operating surgeon determines that the patient is optimally cytoreduced to nodules no greater than 2.5mm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cytoreductive Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Optimal Surgical Debulking

HIPEC with Mitomycin-C

Intervention Type DRUG

EPIC with FUDR and Leucovorin

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cytoreductive Surgery

Optimal Surgical Debulking

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

HIPEC with Mitomycin-C

Intervention Type DRUG

EPIC with FUDR and Leucovorin

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient's age 18 years or older, both genders.
* Clinical diagnosis of appendiceal or colorectal neoplasm with peritoneal mucinosis or metastasis.
* Patient must be planning to undergo complete cytoreduction of all peritoneal disease.
* ECOG performance status ≤ 1.
* Hematology: ANC ≥ 1,500/ μL; Platelets \> 75,000/ μL.
* Adequate Renal function Creatinine \<1.5 x the upper limit of normal (ULN) or calculated creatinine clearance of ≥ 50ml/min.
* Adequate Hepatic function: Bilirubin less than 1.5mg/dL; (except in patients with Gilbert's Syndrome, who must have a total bilirubin less than 3.0mg/dL).
* Women with childbearing potential who are negative for pregnancy test (urine or blood) and who agree to use effective contraceptive method. Reliable contraception should be used from trial screening and must be continued throughout the study. A woman of childbearing potential is defined as one who is biologically capable of becoming pregnant.
* A man participating in this study must agree to utilize reliable barrier form of contraception for the duration of the study.
* Signed and dated written informed consent to participate in this clinical trial must be obtained prior to any study procedure.
* Subjects with a history of endometrial cancer are eligible only if they presented with a stage lower than 1A and if the histology was a subtype other than poorly differentiated.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects who have previously undergone intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
* Subjects with classical carcinoid
* Tumors of low malignant potential
* Other prior malignancies, except for cured non-melanoma skin cancer, curatively treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix, adequately treated malignancies for which there has been no evidence of activity for more than 3 years or indolent tumors for which observation over three years is a reasonable option.
* Presence of clinically apparent or suspected metastasis to sites other than lymph nodes or peritoneal surfaces.
* Women who are pregnant or lactating.
* Subjects with a condition which may interfere with the subjects' ability to understand the requirements of the study.
* Active coronary artery disease (defined as unstable angina or a positive cardiac stress test).
* Subjects with a history of coronary artery disease may be included if they have had a normal stress test within 60 days of enrollment and/or were cleared by MSK cardiology.
* Uncontrolled hypertension defined as \>140/90 and not cleared for surgery at the time of consent.
* New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II or higher Congestive heart failure.
* Restrictive or obstructive pulmonary disease that would limit study compliance or place the patient at unacceptable risk for participation in the study.
* History of cerebrovascular disease. that would limit study compliance or place the patient at unacceptable risk for participation in the study.
* Subjects with other concurrent severe medical problems unrelated to the malignancy that would significantly limit full compliance with the study or places them at an unacceptable risk for participation in the study.
* Patients with known floxuridine, leucovorin ,or mitomycin allergy.
* Evidence of extensive intraperitoneal adhesions at the time of surgery which prohibits intraperitoneal therapy, as determined by the operating surgeon.
* Any condition that would preclude the ability to deliver appropriate IP therapy.
* Use of an oral medication, lacking a suitable non-oral substitute, that if held for up to ten days, would be felt an unacceptable risk by the investigator.
* Life expectancy \< 12 weeks.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Cleveland Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Miami

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Washington University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Garrett Nash, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Miami

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan Kettering Basking Ridge (Consent and Follow up)

Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan Kettering Monmouth (Consent and Follow up)

Middletown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan Kettering Bergen (Consent and Follow up)

Montvale, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan Kettering Commack (Consent and Follow up)

Commack, New York, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan Kettering Westchester (Consent and Follow up)

Harrison, New York, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan Kettering Nassau (Consent and Follow up)

Uniondale, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.mskcc.org/

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

12-289

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.