Lotta Alla Sepsi Ospedaliera - Fighting Hospital Sepsis

NCT ID: NCT01804764

Last Updated: 2023-05-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1123 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-05-31

Study Completion Date

2013-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sepsis is widespread (1.8 million cases annually worldwide) and accounts for a very high mortality: 20-25% of all severe sepsis, 40-70% of all septic shock. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) recommends a first 6 hours "resuscitative bundle" to improve patient's outcome. Despite this, the bundle is poorly performed, because of a superficial knowledge of the guidelines and several difficulties in their clinical implementation. In recognition of this, a "sepsis six" bundle is designed to facilitate early intervention with just three diagnostic and three therapeutic steps to be delivered by staff within 1 h.

The aim of our study is to evaluate if an Educational and Organizational Intervention (EOI) could improve septic patient's outcome in no Critical Care Units. The second endpoint is to evaluate if the compliance to the "sepsis six" bundle could improve after this sort of intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Methods 39 Medical Wards and 12 Emergency Departments, belonging to 12 hospitals, were voluntarily enrolled. Through the collaboration of 12 Multidisciplinary Teams (MT), we took a Pre-EOI picture of the human resources (i.e. doctors to patients ratio) and of the organisational structures (i.e. laboratory's opening hours) of each hospital. For six months, each unit enrolled was asked to fill in a Clinical Checklist for every patient suspected for severe sepsis or septic shock; so that the Pre-EOI "sepsis six" bundle compliance could be evaluated. Then, we planned several pre-agreed educational meetings for all of the doctors and nurses belonging to the enrolled wards. In the meanwhile the MT worked to overcome any impediment to a better septic patient management. Finally, the educated medical staff was asked to fill in again the same Clinical Checklist used in the Pre-EOI phase; so that the Post-EOI "sepsis six" bundle compliance could be evaluated and a comparison with the Pre-EOI phase could be done.

Hypothesis This is the first study aimed to analyze the impact of an Educational and Organizational Intervention in the outcome of septic patients managed in no Critical Care Units. We guess that the differences showed in human resources and organizational structures among the hospitals could have a role in the "sepsis six" bundle compliance and in the patient's outcome, but only a comparison with data collected from the clinical checklist and patient's outcome will confirm our guess. Likewise, we believe that an educational intervention could improve the septic patient's management, but we need the Post-EOI phase conclusion to demonstrate or not our hypothesis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Severe Sepsis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Any patient having a SIRS due to Sepsis and at least on of the following criteria: Systolic Blood Pressure \< 90 mmHg and/or serum lactate \> 4 mg/dl and/or organ failure

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 18 years
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Milano Bicocca

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sergio Vesconi, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cardoso T, Carneiro AH, Ribeiro O, Teixeira-Pinto A, Costa-Pereira A. Reducing mortality in severe sepsis with the implementation of a core 6-hour bundle: results from the Portuguese community-acquired sepsis study (SACiUCI study). Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R83. doi: 10.1186/cc9008. Epub 2010 May 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20459716 (View on PubMed)

Micek ST, Roubinian N, Heuring T, Bode M, Williams J, Harrison C, Murphy T, Prentice D, Ruoff BE, Kollef MH. Before-after study of a standardized hospital order set for the management of septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;34(11):2707-13. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000241151.25426.D7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16943733 (View on PubMed)

Thiel SW, Asghar MF, Micek ST, Reichley RM, Doherty JA, Kollef MH. Hospital-wide impact of a standardized order set for the management of bacteremic severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):819-24. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318196206b.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19237883 (View on PubMed)

Funk D, Sebat F, Kumar A. A systems approach to the early recognition and rapid administration of best practice therapy in sepsis and septic shock. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Aug;15(4):301-7. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832e3825.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19561493 (View on PubMed)

Girardis M, Rinaldi L, Donno L, Marietta M, Codeluppi M, Marchegiano P, Venturelli C; Sopravvivere alla Sepsi Group of the Modena-University Hospital. Effects on management and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock patients admitted to the intensive care unit after implementation of a sepsis program: a pilot study. Crit Care. 2009;13(5):R143. doi: 10.1186/cc8029. Epub 2009 Sep 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19728879 (View on PubMed)

Cronshaw HL, Daniels R, Bleetman A, Joynes E, Sheils M. Impact of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign on the recognition and management of severe sepsis in the emergency department: are we failing? Emerg Med J. 2011 Aug;28(8):670-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.089581. Epub 2010 Jul 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20660901 (View on PubMed)

Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, Calandra T, Dhainaut JF, Gerlach H, Harvey M, Marini JJ, Marshall J, Ranieri M, Ramsay G, Sevransky J, Thompson BT, Townsend S, Vender JS, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL; International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee; American Association of Critical-Care Nurses; American College of Chest Physicians; American College of Emergency Physicians; Canadian Critical Care Society; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; European Respiratory Society; International Sepsis Forum; Japanese Association for Acute Medicine; Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care Medicine; Society of Hospital Medicine; Surgical Infection Society; World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18158437 (View on PubMed)

Talan DA, Moran GJ, Abrahamian FM. Severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2008 Mar;22(1):1-31, v. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2007.09.005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18295681 (View on PubMed)

Ferrer R, Artigas A, Levy MM, Blanco J, Gonzalez-Diaz G, Garnacho-Montero J, Ibanez J, Palencia E, Quintana M, de la Torre-Prados MV; Edusepsis Study Group. Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain. JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2294-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18492971 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.survivingsepsis.org

Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IX/001137-23/12/2010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Diagnostic Accuracy in Sepsis
NCT03956043 COMPLETED
Sepsis in the ICU-II
NCT04695119 RECRUITING