Oral Refeeding IntOlerance After Nasogastric Tube Feeding (ORION)

NCT ID: NCT01798511

Last Updated: 2019-09-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-01

Study Completion Date

2020-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is one of the most common diseases in routine clinical practice of surgeons and gastroenterologists throughout the world. The high rate of pain relapse after oral refeeding contributes to high consumption of healthcare resources and prolonged hospital stay in AP patients. The data from the pilot MIMOSA trial suggest that early administration of nasogastric tube feeding may prevent pain relapse after oral refeeding in AP. The potential beneficial effects of enteral tube feeding include induction of postprandial gastrointestinal motility and improving the tolerance of oral refeeding. This may reduce the risk of pain relapse, thereby shortening length of hospital stay and reducing cost of treatment. The primary endpoint of the ORION trial will be the incidence of oral food intolerance. All eligible AP patients will be randomly allocated to either the Early Nasogastric Tube (ENT) group or Conventional Nutritional Management group (CNM) at 24h of hospital admission.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Pancreatitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nasogastric Tube Feeding

Patients who are to have NTF will receive enteral nutrition within 6 hours after randomisation via a nasogastric tube placed into the stomach. A commercially available low fat semi-elemental feed (Peptisorb®, Nutricia Clinical NZ) will be used. The caloric target will be 2000 kcal per day. Enteral tube feeding will be commenced at a rate of 30 mL/h and increased gradually until 100 mL/h over 24-48 h.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nasogastric Tube Feeding

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A nasogastric tube will be placed into the stomach of patients.

Conventional Nutritional Management

Patients who are to have CNM will be on nil-by-mouth regimen until they either develop signs of severe AP (in which case enteral tube feeding will be introduced) or the signs of AP mitigate,in which case clear liquids (as tolerated) followed by oral food (as tolerated) will be introduced.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Nutritonal Management

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients who are to have CNM will be on nil-by-mouth regimen until they either develop signs of severe AP (in which case nasojejunal tube feeding will be introduced) or the signs of AP mitigate (in which case clear liquids (as tolerated) followed by oral food (as tolerated) will be introduced)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nasogastric Tube Feeding

A nasogastric tube will be placed into the stomach of patients.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional Nutritonal Management

Patients who are to have CNM will be on nil-by-mouth regimen until they either develop signs of severe AP (in which case nasojejunal tube feeding will be introduced) or the signs of AP mitigate (in which case clear liquids (as tolerated) followed by oral food (as tolerated) will be introduced)

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of AP
* Age 18 years or older
* Written informed consent
* Ongoing need for opiates

Exclusion Criteria

* 96 hours after onset of symptoms
* Chronic pancreatitis
* Post-ERCP pancreatitis
* Intraoperative diagnosis
* Pregnancy
* Malignancy
* Received nutrition before randomisation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Auckland, New Zealand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Max Petrov

Principal Investigator Dr. Max Petrov

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Max Petrov, MD, MPH, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Auckland, New Zealand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Auckland

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

New Zealand

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13/NTA/9

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Nutritional Drink in Gastroparesis
NCT03500354 WITHDRAWN NA