A Study Comparing AZD2014 vs Everolimus in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01793636

Last Updated: 2014-06-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

49 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-02-28

Study Completion Date

2015-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

When kidney cancer spreads beyond the kidney, it is known as metastatic kidney cancer. This is very difficult to treat and almost all patients will die of their disease within 2 years of the diagnosis.

Sunitinib and other related drugs (e.g. pazopanib) have become standard therapy for untreated patients with metastatic kidney cancer. They target a growth factor known as VEGF which is important in treating kidney cancer. Although the results with this drug are impressive, patients develop resistance to the drug and stop therapy. It is currently standard practice is to give everolimus when resistance to sunitinib occurs; this is associated with clear clinical benefit.

However the average time to cancer regrowth with everolimus is only 5 months. It is thought this might be because, everolimus only partially inhibits its target (TORC 1 and TORC 2). Therefore further improvement in treating patients is required. AZD2014 is a promising new drug which does inhibit both TORC 1 and TORC 2 and is therefore worthy of investigation in renal cancer as it theoretically could may have advantages over everolimus. Therefore study compares AZD2014 to everolimus in the setting where everolimus is used as standard of care. (e.g. in patients who have failed drug like sunitinib). The study is a randomised trial allowing us to quantify the benefit and potential for further development of AZD2014. Repeat Xrays (CT scans) will be used to assess if the new drug delays tumour growth. Patients will be closely followed up in clinic to ensure safety. A maximum of 122 patients will be recruited into this multi centre national trial. The primary goal of the study is to investigate if AZ2014 delays the time for cancer regrowth (time to progression) compared to everolimus.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Renal cell cancer, also referred to as kidney cancer, is diagnosed in approximately 170,000 people worldwide annually, resulting in 82,000 deaths. Treatment for metastatic kidney cancer is difficult. Almost all of the patients die from their disease.

In 2006 a new drug called sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, transformed treatment options. It targets the development of new blood vessels within the cancer. Although the results with this drug are impressive, patients develop resistance a median after 11 months to the drug, relapse and die of renal cancer. It is currently standard practice to switch to everolimus when resistance to sunitinib occurs; this is associated with clear clinical benefit.

POTENTIAL RISKS FOR PATIENTS RECEIVING AZD2014:

The main risks and burdens to the patients participating in the study are the potential for side effects of the AZD2014 drug. The phase I study using this drug has been completed, therefore we know it is safe to administer to patients and we have a good idea of what side effects the drug causes. But as the drug is given to larger numbers, additional side effects may be discovered. The activity of the drug has not been evaluated in kidney cancer. Therefore we are not sure if AZD2014 will work

POTENTIAL RISKS FOR PATIENTS RECEIVING EVEROLIMUS:

Everolimus is the current standard therapy for these patients so the risks associated with study drug for these patients are the same as standard of care.

POTENTIAL RISKS FOR ALL PATIENTS:

SIDE EFFECTS:

Side effects will be closely monitored during and after the study. Patients are required to attend clinic weekly for the first four weeks and then every 4 weeks whilst they are on study medication where adverse events will be recorded.

The patient information sheet includes details on expected adverse events for patients to look out for and also details that unexpected events may occur. Patients are provided with the research nurse and principal investigator contact details should any adverse events occur during the course of the study.

Other medical professionals are informed that patients are receiving an experimental drug (through GP letter and labelling of hospital records). There will be an independent data monitoring committee for the trial which will closely assess the side effects of the drugs on a regular basis and the trial results to make sure there are no risk excess to patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

AZD2014

AZD2014- tablets, starting dose 50mg BD everyday, until disease progression or untolerable toxicity

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AZD2014

Intervention Type DRUG

AZD2014 vs Everolimus

Everolimus

Everolimus- tablets, starting dose 10mg OD everyday until disease progression or untolerable toxicity

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Everolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

comparing PFS in patients treated with AZD2014 vs Everolimus

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AZD2014

AZD2014 vs Everolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

Everolimus

comparing PFS in patients treated with AZD2014 vs Everolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Everolimus/Afinitor Afinitor

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Histopathologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma with measurable metastases on CT/MRI imaging. Only a component of clear cell is required.
2. Radiological progressive disease on VEGF targeted therapy (RECIST v1.1). Exposure to more than one line of VEGF targeted therapy is acceptable. Previous treatment with initial interferon or IL-2 or other experimental agent is acceptable (with the exception of drugs specifically targeting mTOR).
3. Evidence of measurable disease (ie, ≥1 malignant tumour mass that can be accurately measured in at least 1 dimension ≥ 20 mm with conventional computerized tomography \[CT\] scan or Magnetic Resonance Imaging \[MRI\], or ≥10 mm (except lymph nodes which must have short axis ≥ 15 mm) with spiral CT scan using a 5 mm or smaller contiguous reconstruction algorithm). Bone lesions, ascites, peritoneal carcinomatosis or miliary lesions, pleural or pericardial effusions, lymphangitis of the skin or lung, cystic lesions, or irradiated lesions are not considered measurable.
4. Adequate organ function as defined by the following criteria:

1. Total serum bilirubin ≤1.5 x ULN (patients with Gilbert's disease exempt),
2. Serum transaminases ≤3.0 x ULN (x5 in the presence of liver metastasis).
3. Serum creatinine ≤ 2 x ULN or Cockcroft and Gault \>30ml/min
4. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1.5 x 109/L without growth factor support,
5. Platelets ≥ 100 x 109/L
5. Signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient has been informed of all the pertinent aspects of the trial prior to enrolment.
6. Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plans and laboratory tests and other study procedures
7. ECOG performance status of 0, 1 or 2.
8. Life expectance \>12 weeks
9. At least 14 days since the end of prior systemic treatment (sunitinib, pazopanib, sorafenib), radiotherapy, or surgical procedure with resolution of all treatment-related toxicity to NCI CTCAE Version 4.0 grade ≤1 or back to baseline except for alopecia or hypothyroidism. A 21 day gap between bevacizumab and interferon therapy should exist.
10. Fasting blood sugar ≤8mmol/l and HbA1C ≤7%
11. Age ≥18 years

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous exposure to mTOR inhibitors for metastatic renal cancer.
2. Females of child-bearing potential. The definition of child-bearing potential: women between menarche and menopause who have not been permanently or surgically sterilised and capable of procreation. Female patients must be surgically sterile or be postmenopausal, or must agree to use effective contraception during the period of therapy. The definition of effective contraception will be based on the judgment of the principal investigator or a designated associate. Male patients must be surgically sterile or agree to use effective contraception.
3. Pregnant and Breast feeding women.
4. Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition, or laboratory abnormally that would impart, in the judgment of the investigator, excess risk associated with study participation or study drug administration, or which, in the judgement of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study. Specifically the following indications are contraindicated: Hereditary galacto-intolerance, glucose/galactose malabsorption and lactose deficiency
5. Untreated clinically symptomatic brain or meningeal metastases. Patients with evidence of clinically stable brain metastases are eligible providing that they do not require corticosteroids.
6. Any evidence of severe or uncontrolled diseases e.g., unstable or uncompensated respiratory, hepatic or renal disease.
7. Evidence of interstitial fibrotic lung disease (bilateral, diffuse, parenchymal lung disease).
8. Unresolved toxicity ≥ CTCAE v.4.0 grade 2 (except alopecia and hypothyroidism) from previous anti-cancer therapy.
9. History of other malignancies (except for adequately treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ or localised controlled prostate cancer) within 5 years, unless the patient has been disease free for 2 years and there is a tissue diagnosis of the primary cancer of interest from a target lesion.
10. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or hyperlipidaemia (\> grade 1)
11. Treatment with an investigational drug (not including VEGF TKIs such as pazopanib/ tivozanib) within 21 days prior to the first dose of therapy. If investigational drug is a VEGF TKI then with 14 days prior to the first dose of therapy
12. Patients who have experienced any of the following procedures or conditions currently or in the preceding 12 months:

1. Coronary artery bypass graft
2. Angioplasty
3. Vascular stent
4. Myocardial infarction
5. Angina pectoris
6. Congestive heart failure new york heart association grade ≥2
7. Ventricular arrhythmias requiring continuous therapy
8. Supraventricular arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation, which are uncontrolled
9. Haemorrhagic or thrombotic stroke, including transient ischaemic attacks or
10. Any other central nervous system bleeding
13. Mean resting QTcF ≥470 msec as per local reading
14. Abnormal ECHO at baseline (left ventricular ejection fraction \[LVEF\] \<50%
15. Known inherited or acquired immunodeficiency
16. Known active hepatitis B or C infection or Known HIV.
17. Other concomitant anti-cancer therapy (including LHRH agonists) except steroids
18. Previous bone marrow transplant
19. Age \<18 years
20. Any haemopoietic growth factors (eg, G-CSF, GM-CSF) within 2 weeks prior to receiving study drug
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cancer Research UK

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Queen Mary University of London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Centre of Experimental Medicine

Chief Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas Powles

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Queen Mary University of London, UK

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal Bournemouth Hospital

Bournemouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Sussex County Hospital

Brighton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust

Coventry, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Center

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

St. James' Hospital

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Barts Health NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Free London Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Southampton General Hospital

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Westcliff-on-Sea, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

008424 QM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT01996722

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.