Study of Patients With Metastatic and/or Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma, Treated With Sunitinib/Axitinib.
NCT ID: NCT04033991
Last Updated: 2023-04-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
684 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-09-27
2020-12-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To understand the clinical outcomes of patients treated with sunitinib in first line and axitinib in second line in a real world setting as therapies for metastatic and/or advanced renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).
Primary Objective:
1. What is the progression free survival (PFS) of patients treated in first line with sunitinib, and stratified by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center / International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (MSKCC/IMDC) risk category (favourable, intermediate, poor)?
2. What is the progression free survival (PFS) of patients treated in second line with axitinib, and stratified by MSKCC/IMDC risk category (favourable, intermediate, poor)?
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biomarker Study of Pts With Metastatic ccRCC Undergoing Sequential Therapy With 1st Line Sunitinib and 2nd Line Axitinib
NCT03592199
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Sunitinib Given on an Individualized Schedule
NCT01499121
Sunitinib in Patients With Renal Cells Carcinoma Metastasic or Locally Avanced in Patients Not Candidates to Curative Previous Nefrectomy
NCT00663559
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Combination With Axitinib Versus Sunitinib Monotherapy in Participants With Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-3475-426/KEYNOTE-426)
NCT02853331
An Observational Chart Review Study To Describe The Real-World Outcomes And Use Of Avelumab In Combination With Axitinib For Treatment Of Patients With aRCC In The UK
NCT05394493
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To understand the clinical outcomes of patients treated with sunitinib in first line and axitinib in second line in a real world setting as therapies for metastatic and/or advanced renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).
Primary Objective:
1. What is the progression free survival (PFS) of patients treated in first line with sunitinib, and stratified by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center / International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (MSKCC/IMDC) risk category (favourable, intermediate, poor)?
2. What is the progression free survival (PFS) of patients treated in second line with axitinib, and stratified by MSKCC/IMDC risk category (favourable, intermediate, poor)?
Secondary Objectives:
First Line:
1. What is the overall survival (OS) of all patients in first line with sunitinib, and stratified by MSKCC risk (favourable, intermediate, poor)?
2. What is the duration of therapy with sunitinib in first line (using time to treatment discontinuation \[TTD\]) for all patients and stratified by MSKCC risk (favourable, intermediate, poor)
3. Objective response rate (ORR)
4. Duration of objective response (complete response \[CR\] or partial response \[PR\])
5. Examine factors that predict TTD, e.g. risk stratification, or individual/grouped parameters that comprise the prognostic classification systems
1. Less than one year from time of diagnosis
2. Karnovsky performance status less than 80%
3. Haemoglobin less than the lower limit of normal (e.g. less than 12 g/dl)
4. Serum calcium great than the upper limit of normal (e.g. 10 mg/dl or : 2.5 mmol/l)
5. Neutrophil greater than the upper limit of normal (e.g. greater than 7.0 x109 dl)
6. Platelets greater than the upper limit of normal (e.g. greater than 400 000)
7. Lactate dehydrogenase greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal
8. Fuhrmann grade of tumour
9. Tumour subtype e.g. clear cell versus. non-clear cell
6. Safety and tolerability data reporting for first line sunitinib
Second line:
1. What is the OS of all patients in second line with axitinib, and stratified by MSKCC risk (favourable, intermediate, poor)?
2. What is the duration of therapy with axitinib in second line (using TTD) for all patients and stratified by MSKCC risk (favourable, intermediate, poor)
3. ORR
4. Duration of objective response (CR or PR)
5. Examine factors that predict duration of TTD, e.g. risk stratification, or individual/grouped parameters that comprise the prognostic classification systems
1. Less than one year from time of diagnosis
2. Karnovsky performance status less than 80%
3. Haemoglobin less than the lower limit of normal (e.g. less than 12 g/dl)
4. Serum calcium great than the upper limit of normal (e.g. 10 mg/dl or : 2.5 mmol/l)
5. Neutrophil greater than the upper limit of normal (e.g. greater than 7.0 x109 dl)
6. Platelets greater than the upper limit of normal (e.g. greater than 400 000)
7. Lactate dehydrogenase greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal
8. Fuhrmann grade of tumour
9. Tumour subtype e.g. clear cell vs. non-clear cell
6. Safety and tolerability reporting for second line axitinib
The objectives listed below will also be assessed as exploratory analyses for various patient subgroups of interest, and will be conducted if sufficient numbers of patients are available:
1. Axitinib PFS and OS, as a second line therapy following sunitinib, pazopanib, or following other Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g. sorafenib)
2. Axitinib PFS and OS as a third line therapy
3. Axitinib PFS and OS post-immunotherapy (IO), taking into consideration 2nd and 3rd therapy lines, following all IO therapy options, E.g. atezolizumab/bevacizumab, nivolumab/ipilumimab, nivolumab, interleukin-2
4. For the post-sunitinib axitinib cohort: What was the duration of sunitinib therapy before patients transitioned to axitinib?
5. For the post-pazopanib axitinib cohort: What was the duration of sunitinib therapy before patients transitioned to axitinib?
6. Is the duration of therapy on first line sunitinib and/or pazopanib related to duration of therapy for second line axitinib?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with advanced RCC
Patients with a diagnosis of kidney cancer (renal cell carcinoma, advanced or metastatic)
Sunitinib
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor, licensed for use in treatment of renal cell carcinoma.
Axitinib
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor, licensed for use in treatment of renal cell carcinoma.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sunitinib
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor, licensed for use in treatment of renal cell carcinoma.
Axitinib
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor, licensed for use in treatment of renal cell carcinoma.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma
3. Treatment with sunitinib and/or axitinib
4. Timeframe: from database inception date (2002) until June 30, 2018.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Under the age of 18 years
2. Diagnosis other than renal cell carcinoma
3. No treatment with sunitinib and/or axitinib
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pfizer
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Pfizer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pfizer UK
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Waddell T, Pillai M, Armitage K, Graham DM, Moran M, Dilleen M, Holmes S, Sleszynska-Dopiera E, Hawkins R. Real-world effectiveness of first- and second-line anti-angiogenesis therapy in RCC: analysis of a UK-based population. Future Oncol. 2024;20(33):2547-2558. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2385882. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
X9001180
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.