A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluating Risk of Local Recurrence Following Breast Conserving Surgery and Endocrine Therapy in Low Risk Luminal A Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01791829
Last Updated: 2025-08-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-07-31
2027-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Radiation OmisSion in PAtients With CLinically Node Negative Breast Cancer Undergoing Lumpectomy
NCT05866458
Breast Cancer and Chemo-amennorhea
NCT01867229
Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Post-Lumpectomy in Women With Node Negative Breast Cancer
NCT00156052
Prospective Evaluation of Breast-Conserving Surgery Alone in Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)
NCT04797299
Partial Breast Re-irradiation in Women in Women with Locally Recurrent Breast Cancer Previously Treated with Conservative Surgery and Whole Breast Irradiation
NCT05772390
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We anticipate that the risk of IBTR in the low risk group is likely to be lower than that observed in previous trials (predicted to be \< 5% at 5 years and \< 10% at 10 years) for several reasons: first, our selection criteria (node negative, luminal A, \> or = 55 years, tumours \< or = 2cm, excision margin \> or = 1mm post-BCS, absence of lobular cancers, extensive intraductal component and lymphovascular invasion) are more restrictive than in previous trials and second, the risks of IBTR are steadily decreasing over time due to improvements in mammographic screening, pre-op staging, tumour localization, and surgical practice. The expected low failure rates are unlikely to warrant the use of radiation.
A prospective cohort study was identified as the most appropriate and efficient design as our primary hypothesis is that a group of patients at very low risk of IBTR can be identified. A randomized trial could address the effectiveness of radiation in such a cohort of patients, but would require a much larger sample size to detect very small differences, which would not be clinically meaningful. During the conduct of this trial it is anticipated that patients who do not meet study criteria or who decline study enrollment, will continue to receive BI after BCS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Luminal A with other Clinical Criteria
BCS postulated to be at low risk for IBTR following Endocrine Therapy
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. ER positive (\> or =1%) and PR positive (\>20%) and HER2 negative (Immunohistochemical (IHC) or In Situ Hybridization (ISH) approach);
3. Treated by BCS with microscopically clear resection margins \> or = 1mm for invasive and non-invasive disease or no residual disease on re-excision;
4. Negative axillary node involvement determined by sentinel node biopsy or axillary node dissection.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Multifocal or multicentric disease.
3. Evidence of an extensive intraductal component (defined as a tumour that is composed of 25% or more of DCIS and the DCIS extends beyond the gross dimensions of the tumour), or disease limited to micro invasion only.
4. Grade 3 histology for invasive disease
5. Evidence of lymphovascular invasion.
6. Evidence of disease on pre-operative mammogram, aside from primary cancer treated by breast conserving surgery.
7. Bilateral malignancy of the breast (synchronous or metachronous).
8. Known BRCA 1 or 2 mutations.
9. History of non-breast cancer malignancies if not disease free for \> 5 years and considered low risk of recurrence with the exception of treated carcinoma in-situ of the cervix, endometrium or colon, melanoma in-situ and basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
10. Serious non-malignant disease associated with a life expectancy \< 10 years.
11. Inability to be treated with or to tolerate endocrine therapy.
12. Psychiatric or addictive disorder, which would preclude obtaining informed consent or adherence to protocol.
13. Geographic inaccessibility for follow-up.
14. Inability to understand or unable to provide written informed consent.
15. Inability to be registered on study within 12 weeks of the last surgical procedure on the breast.
16. Central testing for Ki67 \> 13.25% consistent with the luminal B subtype
55 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
British Columbia Cancer Agency
OTHER
Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tim Whelan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)
Sally Smith, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tom Baker Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Abbotsford Centre
Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada
BC Cancer Agency, Centre for the North
Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
BCCA - Vancouver Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
BC Cancer Agency
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Cancer Care Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre
Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Northeastern Ontario Regional Cancer Centre
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
Juravinski Cancer Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Cancer Centre of Southern Ontario at Kingston
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Grand River Regional Cancer Centre
Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
London Regional Cancer Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
R.S. McLaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre
Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Algoma District Cancer Program
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada
Niagara Health System
St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences
Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Centre integre de sante et de services sociaux de laval (CISSS de Laval)
Laval, Quebec, Canada
CHUM - Hopital Notre Dame
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
The Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
CHUQ - Pavillon Hotel-Dieu de Quebec
Québec, Quebec, Canada
CHUS - Hopital Fleurimont
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
The Allan Blair Cancer Centre
Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Saskatoon Cancer Centre
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nielsen TO, Leung SCY, Riaz N, Mulligan AM, Kos Z, Bane A, Whelan TJ. Ki67 assessment protocol as an integral biomarker for avoiding radiotherapy in the LUMINA breast cancer trial. Histopathology. 2023 Dec;83(6):903-911. doi: 10.1111/his.15032. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
Whelan TJ, Smith S, Parpia S, Fyles AW, Bane A, Liu FF, Rakovitch E, Chang L, Stevens C, Bowen J, Provencher S, Theberge V, Mulligan AM, Kos Z, Akra MA, Voduc KD, Hijal T, Dayes IS, Pond G, Wright JR, Nielsen TO, Levine MN; LUMINA Study Investigators. Omitting Radiotherapy after Breast-Conserving Surgery in Luminal A Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023 Aug 17;389(7):612-619. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2302344.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related Info
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OCOG-2012-LUMINA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.