Evaluation of the Efficacy of Platelets Treated With Pathogen Reduction Process
NCT ID: NCT01789762
Last Updated: 2019-04-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
842 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-05-31
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate non-inferiority with regard to prevention and control of haemorrhage:
* of platelet concentrates treated by pathogen reduction(Intercept amotosalen and UVA procedure)
* compared with the usual platelet concentrates (in additive solution intersol), reference arm, and
* compared with platelet concentrates re-suspended in autologous plasma (historic arm) These three products are available and authorised by ANSM (formerly AFSSAPS).
The secondary objectives is to evaluate the transfusion needs, transfusion outcomes and safety and the decreased frequency of grade 2 or higher side effects related to transfusion allergy to platelets.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pathogen Reduction Evaluation & Predictive Analytical Rating Score
NCT02783313
Treatment of Thrombocytopenia in Patients With Chronic Liver DiseaseUndergoing an Elective Procedure
NCT01972529
Perioperative Eltrombopag in Patients With Inherited Thrombocytopenia
NCT03638817
AMG 531 Treatment of Thrombocytopenic Subjects With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Refractory to Splenectomy
NCT00102323
Strategies for Transfusion of Platelets (SToP)
NCT00420914
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several sequences of missing data can be imputed for one patient. Each sequence of missing data will be replaced if and only if the number of consecutive days missing does not exceed 15%\* of the total length of the patient's stay. If one sequence of missing data is longer than the 15%, no replacement will be done for the patient. (Example: If the total stay is 30 days, the maximal length of a missing data sequence accepted is 4 days). The following strategies will be used to replace missing data:
• The first observation is missing: Next observation carried backwards (NOCB) assigns the next known score after the missing value to the missing one.
• The last observation is missing: Last observation carried forward (LOCF) assigns the last known score before the missing value to the missing one. (Suppose that the situation is stable whilst the patient is leaving the hospital.)
• Sequence of one or several missing data with non-missing data before and after the sequence: Last and Next1 assigns the average of the person's last known and next known observation to the missing value. The score is rounded down to the nearest whole number if needed. (Ex mean (1+2) =1)
\* 15% rounded up to nearest whole number.
1 : Engels, J.M. 2003. Imputation of Missing Longitudinal Data : a Comparison of Methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 56 (2003) 968-976
Following a quality analysis of EFFIPAP study's recruitment, it was decided by the sponsor to increase the number of patients. Approximatively thirty additional patients will be included in order to replace non analyzable patients for the following reasons : wrongly included, non-transfused patients, consent withdrawal. Those 30 additional patients will allow us to reach our initial target of 810 analyzable patients in order to respond to the main objective of the study
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Historical control arm
Patients transfused with platelet concentrates re-suspended in autologous plasma
Autologous plasma
Transfusions of platelet concentrates re-suspended in autologous plasma
Control arm
Patients transfused with platelets prepared in additive solution
Additive solution
Transfusions of platelets prepared in additive solution (Intersol)
Experimental arm
Patients transfused with platelets treated by pathogen reduction process
Pathogen reduction process
Patients transfused with platelets treated by pathogen reduction process
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Autologous plasma
Transfusions of platelet concentrates re-suspended in autologous plasma
Additive solution
Transfusions of platelets prepared in additive solution (Intersol)
Pathogen reduction process
Patients transfused with platelets treated by pathogen reduction process
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient hospitalised for bone marrow aplasia, with expected stay of over 10 days and in principle requiring platelet transfusion support (at least twice).
* Signed informed consent
* Patients with DIC can be included; they will undergo a separate analysis.
* A negative pregnancy test is necessary before inclusion in all women of childbearing age
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient requiring curative anticoagulant treatment at the time of inclusion (vitamin K antagonists, heparin (LMWH and NFH), anti-IIa and Xa at curative doses for treatment or prophylaxis of arterial or venous thromboembolic disease (TED) or as part of the treatment for cardiac valvulopathy and complications of atrial fibrillation).
* Thrombocytopenia due to increased destruction
* Patient requires washed platelet concentrates (i.e., with residual plasma less than that remaining during the addition of an additive solution) due to previous intolerance to platelets (cf IgA deficiency, history of major allergic reaction)
* Patient requiring products "CMV negative " (previously included in a protocol transfusion CMV negative)
* Patients with platelet transfusion refractoriness during a previous period of cytopenia, including patient with platelet refractoriness related to an anti-HLA alloimmunization (thus, patient already known as requiring compatible platelets HLA)
* Patient who requires compatible HLA platelets due to a refractory state relative to anti-HLA alloimmunization
* Patient presenting a platelet transfusion refractoriness at the time of previous aplasia.
* Protected adults and persons deprived of liberty
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Grenoble
OTHER
Etablissement Français du Sang
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Besancon
Besançon, , France
CHU de Brest
Brest, , France
CHU de Clermont Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
CHU Henri Mondor - APHP
Créteil, , France
CHU de Dijon
Dijon, , France
CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble, , France
Hopital Huriez - CHRU Lille
Lille, , France
Institut Paoli Calmette
Marseille, , France
Hopital Saint Antoine
Paris, , France
Hospices Civils de Lyon - Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, , France
CHU de Rennes
Rennes, , France
Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Garban F, Guyard A, Labussiere H, Bulabois CE, Marchand T, Mounier C, Caillot D, Bay JO, Coiteux V, Schmidt-Tanguy A, Le Niger C, Robin C, Ladaique P, Lapusan S, Deconinck E, Rolland C, Foote AM, Francois A, Jacquot C, Tardivel R, Tiberghien P, Bosson JL; Evaluation of the Efficacy of Platelets Treated With Pathogen Reduction Process (EFFIPAP) Study Group. Comparison of the Hemostatic Efficacy of Pathogen-Reduced Platelets vs Untreated Platelets in Patients With Thrombocytopenia and Malignant Hematologic Diseases: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;4(4):468-475. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5123.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2012-P001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.