Validation of a French Version of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)
NCT ID: NCT01775982
Last Updated: 2025-11-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
102 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-04-30
2016-02-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A representative sample of geriatric patients for whom a delirium is suspected, will be recruited in the various participating centers, patients will undergo two consecutive visits:
* A visit by a geriatrician, during which the confused state of the patient will be evaluated using the French version of the CAM.
* A visit by a psychiatrist during which the diagnosis of confusional state will be evaluated using the gold standard criteria of the DSM IV.
These two evaluations will be conducted on the same day and blinded from each other.
The order of these two procedures will be balanced within each center. This process will allow the calculation of diagnostic parameters of the CAM French version (validation competitive): sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values .
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Validation of the 3D-CAM and the UB-CAM in French
NCT05242887
Validation of the French Version of the Geriatric Mental State (GMS)
NCT01061827
Screening of Psycho-cognitive Troubles in Elderly Patients
NCT00831805
Translation and Validation of the French Version of Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit
NCT02760446
Incidence of Delirium in Inpatient Elderly Patients
NCT04177589
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study population
See inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Intervention: Psychiatric evaluation Intervention: Geriatric evaluation
A potential intervention order effect will be taken into account by balancing in each center the number of evaluations beginning with the geriatric assessment and those starting with the psychiatric assessment.
Psychiatric evaluation
This evaluation is carried out in several stages:
* Assessment of cognitive functioning;
* Interview with a relative;
* Interview with caregivers;
* Evaluation of the presence of delirium according to DSM-IV criteria;
* Evaluation of the presence of anxiety, depressive syndrome, dementia or other DSM IV;
* Reports of adverse events.
A potential intervention order effect will be taken into account by balancing in each center the number of evaluations beginning with the geriatric assessment and those starting with the psychiatric assessment.
Geriatric evaluation
This evaluation includes a brief interview with a caregiver, diverse scorings (CAM, Delirium Index, Mini Geriatric Depression Scale, Modified Early Warning Score, Clinical Global Impression sclae, Algo Plus), and adverse event reporting.
CAM scoring is carried out by a trained geriatrician and a trained nurse and/or a psychologist.
A potential intervention order effect will be taken into account by balancing in each center the number of evaluations beginning with the geriatric assessment and those starting with the psychiatric assessment.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Psychiatric evaluation
This evaluation is carried out in several stages:
* Assessment of cognitive functioning;
* Interview with a relative;
* Interview with caregivers;
* Evaluation of the presence of delirium according to DSM-IV criteria;
* Evaluation of the presence of anxiety, depressive syndrome, dementia or other DSM IV;
* Reports of adverse events.
A potential intervention order effect will be taken into account by balancing in each center the number of evaluations beginning with the geriatric assessment and those starting with the psychiatric assessment.
Geriatric evaluation
This evaluation includes a brief interview with a caregiver, diverse scorings (CAM, Delirium Index, Mini Geriatric Depression Scale, Modified Early Warning Score, Clinical Global Impression sclae, Algo Plus), and adverse event reporting.
CAM scoring is carried out by a trained geriatrician and a trained nurse and/or a psychologist.
A potential intervention order effect will be taken into account by balancing in each center the number of evaluations beginning with the geriatric assessment and those starting with the psychiatric assessment.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
* Hospitalization in geriatric short stay OR patient consulting at a geriatric assessment center / memory clinic OR geriatric day hospitalization
* Patients for whom a state of confusion is suspected during the pre-inclusion visit run-in based on the following criteria:
* Presence of a cognitive function disorder as defined by a score greater than or equal to 3 on the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) (Pfeiffer E, 1975) AND / OR
* Presence of a mood disorder and / or behavior disorder (regardless of duration) according to the patient's family or caregivers
* Presence of a caregiver who can answer questionnaires concerning activities of everyday life
Exclusion Criteria
* The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
* The patient's family or "trusted-person" refuses to sign the consent
* The patient does not understand french
* Severe aphasia
* Stay is \< = 3 days
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Valéry Antoine, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CH d'Alès
Alès, , France
CHU de Rouen - Hôpital de Bois-Guillaume
Bois-Guillaume, , France
APHP - Hôpital Charles Foix
Ivry-sur-Seine, , France
APHM - Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite
Marseille, , France
CHU de Montpellier - Centre Antonin Balmes
Montpellier, , France
CHU de Nice - Hôpital de Cimiez
Nice, , France
CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes, , France
CHU de Reims - Hôpital Maison Blanche
Reims, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Antoine V, Belmin J, Blain H, Bonin-Guillaume S, Goldsmith L, Guerin O, Kergoat MJ, Landais P, Mahmoudi R, Morais JA, Rataboul P, Saber A, Sirvain S, Wolfklein G, de Wazieres B. [The Confusion Assessment Method: Transcultural adaptation of a French version]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2018 May;66(3):187-194. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2018.01.133. Epub 2018 Apr 4. French.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-A01161-40
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
PHRC-N/2011/VA-04
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.