Study of the Effect of Synchronised Anaemia Management in Chronic Kidney Disease

NCT ID: NCT01763242

Last Updated: 2013-01-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-12-31

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aims:

1. To establish an electronic process for CKD anaemia management using monthly synchronized dosing of erythrocyte stimulating agents (ESA).
2. To compare this electronic process with "present anaemia management" in the traditional outpatient setting.
3. To monitor Hb targets and clinical endpoints of study groups to model a larger multicentre study focusing on these endpoints.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

CKD Stages 3 to 5 Subjects will be randomised and stratified according to Age, Gender, CKD Stage, Known Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes and ESA Type into EMAN vs. Control

Details of EMAN synchronization and Dosing:

Monthly dose of ESA is calculated by:

Monthly dose = present dose x (28/present frequency (days))

Synchronization will be achieved by using the formula: "Synchronization dose of ESA = (28-Days until next injection is due)/28 x monthly dose of ESA

The dose of ESA/C.E.R.A. should be adjusted to maintain the individual patient's haemoglobin within a range of 11± 1.0 g/dL of the reference haemoglobin concentration ie. between 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL

Haemoglobin Value Corrective Adjustment

* A single value \>13 g/dL Interrupt treatment until Hb falls below 12 g/dL then re-start treatment at 50% of previous dose
* A single value \<9 g/dL Increase dose by 50%
* Difference between two consecutive Hb values indicates ≥2 g/dL increase Reduce dose by 50%
* Difference between two consecutive Hb values indicates ≥2 g/dL decrease Increase dose by 50%
* \>11.5 g/dL and \<13 g/dL AND deviation from reference value is \>1g/dL. Reduce dose by 25%
* \<10.5 g/dL and \>9 g/dL AND deviation from reference value is \>1g/dL. Increase dose by 25%
* \>12 g/dL Reduce dose by 25%
* \<10 g/dL Increase dose by 25%

Statistics:

Audit of present practice suggests CKD patients achieve only 30% on target (Hb 10-12g/dL) while well audited dialysis units in our service can achieve 60% at target.

If an improvement from 30% to 60% is expected in the EMAN verses Control arm then 100 patients (50 in each group) would be required to show a significant difference p\<0.05 with 85% power.

Patients will be analysed on an intention to treat basis Primary and Secondary Endpoint data will be compared between study and control groups using unpaired student t-tests after normalisation of data as required and/or chi squared analysis.

Statistical significance will be taken at p\<0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Kidney Failure, Chronic Anemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EMAN

Electronic auditing via synchronised blood tests and monthly dosing ESA and Home delivery of ESA from Pharmacy if required

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EMAN

Intervention Type OTHER

See details on ESA Synchronization and Dosing in Detailed Description Above

Control

Standard Outpatient Care with usual blood tests and follow up, and varied ESA dosing and frequency times. Patients are responsible for collecting their own ESA from Pharmacy

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EMAN

See details on ESA Synchronization and Dosing in Detailed Description Above

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Synchronised Blood Testing Electronic upload of Blood Results Synchronised ESA dosing monthly Home delivery of ESA

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Written informed consent
* Age \> 18 years
* Chronic renal anaemia already on ESA therapy as defined by Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Significant acute bleeding such as overt gastrointestinal bleeding
* A known haematological cause for anaemia
* Known metastatic malignancy
* Present participation in another interventional clinical trial • Known hypersensitivity to recombinant human erythropoietin, polyethylene glycol or to any constituent of the study medication
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Western Health, Australia

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Craig Nelson

Head of Unit - Nephrology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Craig L Nelson, MBBSFRACPPhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Western Health, Australia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Western Health

Footscray, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HREC: 2010.267

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.