Role of Endotracheal Suction on the Occurrence of Meconium Aspiration Syndrome in Non-vigorous Meconium Stained Babies
NCT ID: NCT01758822
Last Updated: 2014-07-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
175 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-05-31
2013-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Meconium Aspiration and Tracheal Suctioning-Feasibility Study
NCT02708563
Effect Of Intrapartum Oropharyngeal (IP-OP) Suction on Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
NCT01328483
Effect of Gastric Lavage in Preventing Feeding Problems in Babies Born With Meconium Stained Amniotic Fluid
NCT01306500
Early Bolus Surfactant Replacement Therapy Versus Standard Care in Term Neonates With Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
NCT06090981
Time of Positive Pressure Ventilation in Non-vigorous Infants Born Through Meconium-stained Amniotic Fluid
NCT04076189
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aspiration of meconium into the tracheo-bronchial tree with the onset of respiration results in meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). MAS is defined as respiratory distress in an infant born through MSAF with compatible chest x-ray findings whose symptoms cannot be otherwise explained.
Despite current interventions such as intubation and tracheal suction, it is estimated that 5-20 % of infants born through MSAF develop MAS. It represents a leading cause of perinatal morbidity. Approximately 50% of the infants with MAS require mechanical ventilation; 15%-30% develop pulmonary air leaks and 5%-12% die.
There are various proposed mechanisms by which meconium causes lung injury, some of the important ones being
* Mechanical obstruction of airways
* Chemical pneumonitis
* Vasoconstriction of pulmonary vessels
* Inactivation of surfactant
* Activation of compliment
Finding of meconium below cords or in the trachea has been shown to be associated with development of MAS. This resulted in use of endotracheal suction along with oro-nasopharyngeal suctioning in all infants born to mothers with MSAF prior to the year 2000.
Although, a number of studies performed did not show reduction in incidence of MAS and/or mortality even after performing oro-nasopharyngeal and endotracheal suction, the practice was continued due to lack of robust evidence.
Subsequently, as a result of well performed randomized controlled trials and systematic review showing no effect of oro-nasopharyngeal suctioning on occurrence of MAS, this practice has been abandoned since the year 2005.
ET suction is currently performed in depressed meconium stained neonates with the idea of removing meconium from the upper airways to relieve mechanical obstruction and to prevent subsequent development of chemical pneumonitis.
Since meconium aspiration can occur in-utero as well and with time the aspirated meconium migrates peripherally, the effectiveness of ET suction post-delivery in clearing the airway is not clear. Furthermore, accumulating evidence points to potential role of hypoxia-asphyxia-acidosis with concomitant presence of meconium in the pathogenesis of lung disease.
Current practice of Endotracheal suctioning in non-vigorous babies has not been systematically evaluated, till date. No studies have compared the incidence, severity and outcomes of MAS in 'suctioned versus non-suctioned' non vigorous meconium stained neonates. In addition, the procedure needs expertise to be completed in the stipulated time and has potential for complications like vocal cord injury, laryngeal edema, bleeding from upper airway secondary to trauma during the procedure and persistent hoarseness of voice even at six months of age. The rate of complications is more when performed by people with lesser expertise as this is a difficult skill to learn and master.
In view of the foregoing the contribution of endotracheal suction in preventing MAS and its effect on severity of lung disease is not clear. Thus this study is an attempt to evaluate the role of endotracheal suction in non-vigorous meconium stained neonates.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
No Endotracheal suction
In the experimental group, endotracheal suction will not be performed during the initial steps of resuscitation of non-vigorous meconium stained neonate
No endotracheal suction
Neonates in this group will be resuscitated without endotracheal suction in the initial steps of resuscitation.
Endotracheal suction
In the No intervention group endotracheal suction will be performed during the initial steps of resuscitation of non - vigorous meconium stained neonate
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No endotracheal suction
Neonates in this group will be resuscitated without endotracheal suction in the initial steps of resuscitation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Cephalic Presentation
* Singleton pregnancy
* Presence of meconium stained amniotic fluid
* Nonvigorous at birth
Exclusion Criteria
* Refusal of consent
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lady Hardinge Medical College
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sushma Nangia, M.D.
Professor of Pediatrics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sushma Nangia, MBBS, MD, DM
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lady Hardinge Medical College New Delhi, India
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kalawati Saran children's Hospital, Lady Hardinge Medical College
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nangia S, Sunder S, Biswas R, Saili A. Endotracheal suction in term non vigorous meconium stained neonates-A pilot study. Resuscitation. 2016 Aug;105:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 May 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LHMC/2011/PED/019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.