A Noninferiority RCT Comparing Operative vs Nonoperative Treatment for ER-stress Positive Weber-B Unimalleolar Fractures
NCT ID: NCT01758796
Last Updated: 2023-09-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
126 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-01-31
2024-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PRCT-study of Different Non-operative Treatment Protocols of ER-stress Negative Weber-B Unimalleolar Ankle Fractures.
NCT01758835
Functional Orthosis Versus Cast Immobilization for Partially Unstable Weber B Ankle Fractures
NCT05412693
Weight-bearing Radiographs to Evaluate Stability in Ankles With Isolated Weber Type B Fractures.
NCT03831009
RCT Comparing Non-operative vs Operative Treatment of Suprasyndesmotic Ankle Fractures.
NCT04615650
Unimalleolar Versus Bimalleolar Fixation in Bi- or Trimalleolar Ankle Fracture
NCT01757951
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The most common complication following operative treatment of ankle fracture is wound infection, the incidence ranging from 6.1 to10% in unselected patient materials.
To date, there is only one published randomized trial comparing operative and non-operative treatment in patients with an unstable unimalleolar fibula fracture. In this 1-year follow-up, the authors concluded that patients managed nonoperatively had equivalent functional outcomes compared with operative treatment; however, the risk of fracture displacement and problems with union was substantially higher in patients managed nonoperatively. In turn, 10/41 (24%) patients treated operatively were re-operated; five patients had a post-operative infection and five patients required hardware removal.
This prospective randomized non-inferiority trial is designed to compare surgical and non-operative treatment of ER-stress positive unimalleolar ankle fractures. The primary, non-inferiority, intention-to-treat outcome is the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score at 104 weeks or 24 months (OMAS; range, 0-100; higher scores indicating better outcome and fewer symptoms). The predefined non-inferiority margin for the primary outcome at the primary assessment time point is 8 points. Secondary outcomes are ankle function, pain, quality of life, ankle range of motion, and radiographic outcome. Follow-up assessments are performed at 2, 6, 12, and 104 weeks (primary time point). Treatment related complications and harms; symptomatic non-unions, loss of congruity of the ankle joint, and wound infections are also recorded.
The ER-stress test is performed by a consultant trauma orthopedic surgeon or a trauma resident who has completed trauma rotation. Medial clear space opening of 5 mm or more will be considered a positive ER stress test. Patients are randomized to non-operative or surgical treatment using a sealed envelope method. Surgical treatment is carried out using a standard open reduction and internal fixation with 1/3 semitubular plate and screws. Post-operatively, surgically treated ankles are placed in a below-the-knee cast for six weeks. They are advised to carry out partial weight-bearing (15 to 20 kilograms) for the first four weeks and then weight-bear as tolerated for the remaining two weeks. The non-operative treatment protocol is similar to that of the surgically treated patients: six-week below-the-knee cast with partial weight-bearing for the first four weeks and then weight-bearing as tolerated for the remaining two weeks.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Non-operative
Non-operative treatment with six weeks in a below-the-knee cast. Partial weight-bearing (15 to 20 kilograms) for the first four weeks and then weight-bearing as tolerated for the remaining two weeks.
Non-operative treatment
Below-the-knee cast for six weeks.
Surgery
Open reduction and internal fixation with 1/3 semitubular plate and screws. Post-operatively, surgically treated ankles are placed in a below-the-knee cast for six weeks. They are advised to carry out partial weight-bearing (15 to 20 kilograms) for the first four weeks and then weight-bear as tolerated for the remaining two weeks.
Surgery
Open reduction and internal fixation with 1/3 semi-tubular plate and screws.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Non-operative treatment
Below-the-knee cast for six weeks.
Surgery
Open reduction and internal fixation with 1/3 semi-tubular plate and screws.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age: 16 years or older
* Voluntary
* Operated within 7 days of the trauma
* Walking without aid before accident
Exclusion Criteria
* Pilon fracture
* Bilateral ankle fracture
* Simultaneous crural fracture
* Pathological fracture
* Active infection around the ankle
* A previous ankle fracture or significant medial ligament trauma
* Lives outside our hospital district or a foreigner
* Co-operation is insufficient
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Oulu
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Harri Pakarinen
Orthopedic surgeon, MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Harri J Pakarinen, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Oulu University Hospital
Tero HJ Kortekangas, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oulu University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
OYS, Oulu university hospital, Department of orthopedic and traumatology
Oulu, North Ostrobothnia, Finland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OYSrct-Ankle3.2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.