A Comparison of the Performance of Standard Double Lumen Tubes With Vivasight DL™ Double Lumen Tubes for Lung Isolation in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery

NCT ID: NCT01757977

Last Updated: 2013-03-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-08-31

Study Completion Date

2013-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators have performed a number of studies on novel airway devices. In this randomized controlled trial he investigators would like to compare the performance of a new double-lumen endotracheal tube incorporating internal camera (Vivasight DL) with a standard double lumen tube.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Single lung ventilation is frequently carried out to facilitate surgery on the lungs and pleura. In most instances this is achieved by insertion of a double-lumen endotracheal tube and then selectively ventilating one lung or both. Precise positioning of these tubes is essential for optimal performance. It has become the standard of care to perform bronchoscopy to confirm tube position.

A new double lumen endotracheal tube (Vivasight DL) has recently been developed. It has all the features of a standard double lumen endotracheal tube but also incorporates an internal camera which, when connected to an external screen, allows continuous confirmation of tube position.

This is randomized, single blinded controlled trial. The participants will be allocated to two study groups (Vivasight DL or standard DLT), in which the primary airway management device will be respectively Vivasight DL double lumen tube or a standard double lumen endotracheal tube.

Clinical Research Ethics Committee approval has been obtained. Suitable participants will be recruited after written informed consent.

Standard anesthetic preassessment and anesthesia will be provided.

Consenting patients passing the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to either of the 2 study groups.

Protocol for attempts at placement and tube position confirmation will be followed.

The investigators will monitor a number of parameters, including time and ease of tube insertion, ability to verify tube position with the primary imaging modality for each group, need to perform tube position adjustment maneuvers, need to use fiberoptic bronchoscope during the case, quality of lung collapse, problems with ventilation and other.

The primary hypothesis is that the new Vivasight DL tube system will provide a comparable optical view to the fiberoptic scope view obtained via standard double lumen endotracheal tube in order to confirm optimal position.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Performance and Safety of an Airway Management Device

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Vivasight DL

placement and intraoperative use of Vivasight DL double lumen endobronchial tube

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

double lumen endotracheal tube placement and use

Intervention Type DEVICE

standard DLT

placement and intraoperative use of a standard double lumen endotracheal tube.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

double lumen endotracheal tube placement and use

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

double lumen endotracheal tube placement and use

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 16 - 85 yr old patients capable of informed consent
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status) 1-3
* non-emergency surgery of expected duration \< 6 hours
* one-lung ventilation required

Exclusion Criteria

* BMI \> 35
* expected difficult airway
* Mallampati score \>2
* increased risk of aspiration
* upper airway or upper GI problems
* live pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

John Laffey

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

John Laffey

Professor of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Consultant Anaesthetist

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brian Harte, FFARCSI

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Galway University Hospitals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Galway University Hospitals

Galway, , Ireland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Ireland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

C.A.751

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.