Study of Tivantinib in Subjects With Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Who Have Been Treated With One Prior Therapy

NCT ID: NCT01755767

Last Updated: 2021-04-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

383 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-12-27

Study Completion Date

2017-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if tivantinib (ARQ 197) is effective in treating patients with MET diagnostic-high hepatocellular carcinoma (liver cancer) who have already been treated once with another therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Expression of c-Met in tumors correlates with aggressive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) features. Overexpression of the receptor in tumor samples or high level of blood HGF in subjects is related to higher recurrence rate after surgery for HCC, while high c-Met expression correlates with shorter survival in HCC subjects. In summary, c-Met holds an important prognostic role in the natural history of HCC. This Phase 3 study in MET Diagnostic-High inoperable HCC subjects has been designed based on the results from the randomized, controlled Phase 2 study conducted by ArQule, Inc. with tivantinib versus placebo in subjects with MET Diagnostic-High inoperable HCC who have failed one prior systemic therapy, mentioned above. The purpose of this study is to confirm the efficacy of tivantinib in MET Diagnostic-High HCC subjects who were previously treated with one systemic therapy, and to further evaluate the safety profile of the experimental drug in this subject population.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tivantinib 240 mg BID Cohort

The tivantinib dosage of 240 mg tablets administered by mouth twice daily (BID), once in the morning and once in the evening, with food, for a total daily dose of 480 mg.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tivantinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Tivantinib tablets

Tivantinib 120 mg BID Cohort

Tivantinib 120 mg is administered by oral tablet BID, once in the morning and once in the evening, with food, for a total daily dose of 240 mg (amended dosing group; primary analysis group).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tivantinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Tivantinib tablets

Placebo Matching 240 mg BID Cohort

Matching placebo is administered by oral tablet(s) BID, once in the morning and once in the evening, with food.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching placebo tablets

Placebo Matching 120 mg BID Cohort

Matching placebo is administered by oral tablet(s) BID, once in the morning and once in the evening, with food.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching placebo tablets

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tivantinib

Tivantinib tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Matching placebo tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ARQ197 Placebo comparator

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically confirmed HCC that is inoperable (where surgery is not indicated due to disease extension, co-morbidities, or other technical reasons), and not eligible for local therapy
* MET Diagnostic-High tissue reported by the central authorized laboratory using archival or recent biopsy tumor samples
* Received at least 4 weeks of one prior sorafenib containing systemic therapy and then experienced documented radiographic disease progression; or inability to tolerate prior therapy received for at least a minimum period of time.
* Discontinued prior systemic treatment or any investigational drug for at least 2 weeks (14 days) or for at least 3 weeks for IV anti-cancer drugs, prior to the study randomization
* Local or loco-regional therapy (i.e., surgery, radiation therapy, hepatic arterial embolization, chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, or cryoablation) must have been completed \>= 4 weeks prior to randomization
* Measurable disease as defined by the RECIST v1.1.

Exclusion Criteria

* More than 1 prior systemic regimen (prior MET inhibitors/antibodies are not allowed; experimental systemic therapy for inoperable HCC given before or after sorafenib counts as separate regimen and is not allowed)
* Child-Pugh B-C cirrhotic status based on clinical findings and laboratory results
* Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct from HCC in primary site or histology, EXCEPT cervical carcinoma in situ, treated basal cell carcinoma, and superficial bladder tumors. Any cancer curatively treated more than 3 years prior to enrollment is permitted.
* History of congestive heart failure defined as Class II to IV per New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification within 6 months prior to study entry; active coronary artery disease (CAD); clinically significant bradycardia or other uncontrolled, cardiac arrhythmia defined as greater than or equal to Grade 3 according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), or uncontrolled hypertension; myocardial infarction occurring within 6 months prior to study entry (myocardial infarction occurring more than 6 months prior to study entry is permitted)
* Active clinically serious infections defined as \>= Grade 3 according to NCI CTCAE
* Any medical, psychological, or social conditions, particularly if unstable, including substance abuse, that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, interfere with the subject's safety or participation in the study, protocol compliance, or evaluation of the study results
* Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
* Blood or albumin transfusion within 5 days prior to the blood draw being used to confirm eligibility
* Concomitant interferon therapy or therapies for active Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection
* Pregnancy or breast-feeding
* History of liver transplant
* Inability to swallow oral medications
* Clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding occurring \<= 4 weeks prior to randomization
* Pleural effusion or clinically evident (visible or palpable) ascites
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ArQule, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, NJ USA)

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Daiichi Sankyo

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Global Clinical Leader

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Daiichi Sankyo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Westwood, Kansas, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Scarborough, Maine, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., Argentina

Site Status

Pilar, , Argentina

Site Status

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Barretos, , Brazil

Site Status

Rio de Janeiro, , Brazil

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Caen, , France

Site Status

Clichy, , France

Site Status

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Reims, , France

Site Status

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Aachen, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Meldola, Forli-Cesena, Italy

Site Status

Rozzano, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Orbassano (TO), Torino, Italy

Site Status

Benevento, , Italy

Site Status

Bergamo, , Italy

Site Status

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Modena, , Italy

Site Status

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Padua, , Italy

Site Status

Parma, , Italy

Site Status

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

Pisa, , Italy

Site Status

Reggio Emilia, , Italy

Site Status

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Turin, , Italy

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Vila Real, , Portugal

Site Status

Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain

Site Status

Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Pamplona, Navarre, Spain

Site Status

Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain

Site Status

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Sabadell, , Spain

Site Status

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Zaragoza, , Spain

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada France Germany Italy Netherlands New Zealand Portugal Spain Sweden Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rimassa L, Assenat E, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Pracht M, Zagonel V, Mathurin P, Rota Caremoli E, Porta C, Daniele B, Bolondi L, Mazzaferro V, Harris W, Damjanov N, Pastorelli D, Reig M, Knox J, Negri F, Trojan J, Lopez Lopez C, Personeni N, Decaens T, Dupuy M, Sieghart W, Abbadessa G, Schwartz B, Lamar M, Goldberg T, Shuster D, Santoro A, Bruix J. Tivantinib for second-line treatment of MET-high, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (METIV-HCC): a final analysis of a phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2018 May;19(5):682-693. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30146-3. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29625879 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012-003308-10

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ARQ197-A-U303

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

c-Met Second-Line Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT02115373 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Trial of TRC105 and Sorafenib in Patients With HCC
NCT02560779 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2