Positive Predictive Value of the Dx-pH Probe for Predicting PPI Response in LPR
NCT ID: NCT01755221
Last Updated: 2024-04-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
42 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-08-31
2016-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of an Oropharyngeal Aerosolized pH Probe for Diagnosing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR)
NCT00321503
Benefit of Pharyngeal and Oesophageal pH-impedance of Patients With High Suspicion of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
NCT01854970
A New Nasopharyngeal pH Probe for Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
NCT01308502
Prevacid vs Lifestyle Modifications for the Treatment of LPR
NCT00274339
Precision Approach to PPI Therapy in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
NCT03619811
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Adult patients with Reflux Symptom Index scores (RSI) greater than or equal to 13 off PPI therapy
1. Restech pH probe placement at initial clinic visit; subject returns 24 hrs later for probe removal.
2. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy; subject starts PPI medication (omeprazole 40mg once daily) and returns for follow-up visit 8-12 weeks later.
3. Optional second pH probe placement at follow up visit; Subject returns 24 hours later for probe removal; Subject continues PPI medication for 2 more weeks
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Symptom duration of greater than 1 month
* Ages 18-89
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of findings of alternative diagnosis explaining symptoms e.g.: laryngeal mass, objective post nasal drainage
* Contraindication to PPI therapy (i.e.: atrophic gastritis, liver problems, severe bloody diarrhea from antibiotics, osteoporosis, broken bone) or unwillingness to initiate PPI therapy
* Pregnancy: There is no contraindication for the Restech pH probe and pregnancy; however, PPI use in pregnant women is contraindicated and thus pregnant women would be ineligible to participate in this study because they would be unable to complete a course of omeprazole.
* Unwillingness or inability to undergo 24 hour pharyngeal pH probe monitoring (for example, oxygen wearing requirement that prevents probe placement or anatomical preclusions like septal perforation).
* Bleeding disorder and/or unable to stop use of anticoagulants such as aspirin, Coumadin (warfarin), and/or Plavix (clopidogrel)
18 Years
89 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Respiratory Technology Corporation
INDUSTRY
Northwestern University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bruce Tan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation (NMFF) Sinus and Allergy Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Branski RC, Bhattacharyya N, Shapiro J. The reliability of the assessment of endoscopic laryngeal findings associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. Laryngoscope. 2002 Jun;112(6):1019-24. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200206000-00016.
Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice. 2002 Jun;16(2):274-7. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(02)00097-8.
Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms improve before changes in physical findings. Laryngoscope. 2001 Jun;111(6):979-81. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200106000-00009.
Williams RB, Szczesniak MM, Maclean JC, Brake HM, Cole IE, Cook IJ. Predictors of outcome in an open label, therapeutic trial of high-dose omeprazole in laryngitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 May;99(5):777-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04151.x.
Kawamura O, Aslam M, Rittmann T, Hofmann C, Shaker R. Physical and pH properties of gastroesophagopharyngeal refluxate: a 24-hour simultaneous ambulatory impedance and pH monitoring study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1000-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30349.x.
Ali T, Roberts DN, Tierney WM. Long-term safety concerns with proton pump inhibitors. Am J Med. 2009 Oct;122(10):896-903. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.04.014.
Friedman M, Hamilton C, Samuelson CG, Kelley K, Taylor R, Darling R, Taylor D, Fisher M, Maley A. The value of routine pH monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Jun;146(6):952-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599812436952. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
Ayazi S, Lipham JC, Hagen JA, Tang AL, Zehetner J, Leers JM, Oezcelik A, Abate E, Banki F, DeMeester SR, DeMeester TR. A new technique for measurement of pharyngeal pH: normal values and discriminating pH threshold. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Aug;13(8):1422-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0915-6. Epub 2009 May 7.
Becker V, Graf S, Schlag C, Schuster T, Feussner H, Schmid RM, Bajbouj M. First agreement analysis and day-to-day comparison of pharyngeal pH monitoring with pH/impedance monitoring in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jun;16(6):1096-101. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1866-x. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
Yadlapati R, Pandolfino JE, Lidder AK, Shabeeb N, Jaiyeola DM, Adkins C, Agrawal N, Cooper A, Price CP, Ciolino JD, Gawron AJ, Smith SS, Bove M, Tan BK. Oropharyngeal pH Testing Does Not Predict Response to Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Laryngeal Symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;111(11):1517-1524. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.145. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
Yadlapati R, Adkins C, Jaiyeola DM, Lidder AK, Gawron AJ, Tan BK, Shabeeb N, Price CP, Agrawal N, Ellenbogen M, Smith SS, Bove M, Pandolfino JE. Abilities of Oropharyngeal pH Tests and Salivary Pepsin Analysis to Discriminate Between Asymptomatic Volunteers and Subjects With Symptoms of Laryngeal Irritation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;14(4):535-542.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.11.017. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
71707
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.