Which Supraesophageal Reflux Symptoms Reliably Respond to Proton-Pump-Inhibitor (PPI) Therapy
NCT ID: NCT00170001
Last Updated: 2011-12-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
500 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-04-30
2006-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypotheses/Questions: Our underlying assumptions are as follows: SER is due to the passage of gastric contents into the esophagus; and with adequate acid suppression provided by a PPI, there is less overall volume available to reflux, which should improve SER. We hypothesize that persons with the particular cluster of symptoms that are due to SER will have complete resolution of those symptoms with adequate acid suppression when PPI is administered for an adequate duration of time.
Primary Aim:
* To determine which symptom(s) (chronic cough, hoarseness, sore throat, globus sensation, or throat clearing) are completely ameliorated with PPI therapy and hence reflective of SER.
Secondary Aims:
* To determine which features of a patient's history are predictive of a positive response to PPI therapy, and which confer lack of response; and
* To develop a scoring system for the SRQ that would predict a diagnosis of SER.
Methods:
Design: Large simple randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of subjects with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms.
Population: Subjects will be recruited from Olmsted County and from General ENT Clinic and Pulmonary Chronic Cough Clinic.
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects must have at least 1 of 5 chronic (present for at least one month) and recurrent (at least twice per week) symptoms of interest.
Randomization: A dynamic allocation algorithm will be used by the Mayo Pharmacy to balance the treatment arms for confounding variables for treatment allocation.
Study Intervention: Either twice daily esomeprazole 40 mg or placebo for 6 months. Beyond a urine pregnancy test for women of child-bearing age, no other examination is required for enrollment or participation.
Follow-Up: Subjects will be contacted by phone monthly to assess symptoms, check compliance, and adverse events.
Primary Outcome: True responders will be those subjects who lack at least one of their initial symptoms by the 3-month time period, and remain asymptomatic at 4, 5 and 6 months.
Sample Size: Based on previous studies we anticipate a 30-40% placebo response rate at 3 months that will not be sustained at 6 months. We expect roughly 60% to completely respond to PPI therapy (i.e. 40% do not completely respond). Assuming 140 patients do not completely respond, we would need 350 patients on PPI therapy. Hence, 70 subjects will be randomized to receive PPI therapy and 30 randomized to placebo for each symptom group for a total N=500.
Analysis: Logistic regression.
Significance: This project will identify patients with laryngopharyngeal symptoms most likely to benefit from empiric PPI therapy. Until we have clarified which symptoms best respond and do not respond to therapy, we are bound to repeat the errors of the past. Finally, this project will further validate the SRQ for use in future trials.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sugar pill
Sugar Pill
40 mg BID
Active Comparator
Nexium
40 mg bid dosing
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nexium
40 mg bid dosing
Sugar Pill
40 mg BID
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* History of esophagus/stomach surgery (SRQ item 22)
* Peptic or duodenal ulcer disease; stomach or gastric ulcer disease; history of esophageal stricture, or Barrett's esophagus, or esophagitis, or tumor of the esophagus or stomach (SRQ item 23 and review of electronic surgical records of Mayo Clinic patients)
* Presence of alarm symptoms (hemoptysis, unexplained loss of 10 or more pounds in the past 3 months), obtained from Appendix 5 for Community Subjects, medical record for clinic subjects. History of dysphagia, defined as a yes answer to SRQ item 7.
* PPI use within 4 weeks, obtained from Appendix 5 for Community Subjects, medical record for clinic subjects
* Use of warfarin or digoxin, obtained from Appendix 5 for Community Subjects, medical record for clinic subjects
* Pregnancy at the time of enrollment, based on urine pregnancy test
* Inability to understand or read English at a 6th grade level
* Residence outside of the United States of America (USA)
* Age younger than 18 years old
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AstraZeneca
INDUSTRY
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yvonne Romero, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRUSESOM0376
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
452-05
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id