Registry for Integrative Medicine Interventions Effectiveness
NCT ID: NCT01754038
Last Updated: 2019-07-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
5069 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-08-31
2019-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Essential data elements that capture patient-reported outcomes and measures of clinical activity will be obtained at approximately 2-month intervals for the first 6 months, then every 6 months through the end of year 2.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
VA Integrated Medication Manager
NCT01787175
Tailored Non-Pharmacotherapy Services for Chronic Pain
NCT04523714
The Adapting Disease Specific Outcome Measures Pilot Trial for Telehealth in Myasthenia Gravis
NCT05917184
An Electronic Personal Health Record for Mental Health Consumers
NCT01724125
IMproving Pain Using Peer RE-inforced Self-management Skills
NCT01748227
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), observational databases provide an opportunity for simultaneous exploration of the impact of integrative medicine on various medical conditions. As opposed to selecting a single condition for which patients may seek care at our sites, the project will allow us to collect prospective patient-reported outcomes on a number of frequently seen medical conditions. By clustering participants at the multiple IM clinical sites with the same medical condition, we will be able to compare the impact of various integrative therapies on patient-reported outcomes.
Objectives:
Primary Objective
1\. To evaluate the change in patient-reported outcomes (e.g. quality of life, mood and stress) over time
Secondary Objectives
1. To evaluate whether patient-reported outcomes differ by baseline characteristics of the participants (e.g. demographics, clinical condition, intervention sought)
2. In a subset of clinics, to collect cost data from patient encounters to allow cost comparisons among the interventions and outcomes
OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) The PRIMIER Registry will use the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) as an online research management tool that can be used to collect PRO data. REDCap is a free, online research management tool that enables researchers to create study-specific Web sites for capturing participant data securely.
Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) is the term used to denote health data that is provided by the patient through a system of reporting. A PRO is basically a patient's feedback on their feelings or functions as they are dealing with chronic diseases or conditions. PROs can also be measured when patients are undergoing treatment or are participating in a clinical trial.
The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®), funded by the National Institutes of Health, aims to provide clinicians and researchers access to efficient, valid, and responsive self-reported measures of health, including symptoms, function and well-being. PROMIS® instruments (short forms, computerized adaptive tests (CATs), profiles) are a central feature of the Assessment Center instrument library.
PROMIS® is unique from other PRO systems in four ways:
1. PROMIS® data is comparable because there are common measurements across domains
2. PROMIS® measures are reliable and valid. They have been subjected to rounds of rigorous review and testing to ensure that the measurements are precise, consistent, and accurate.
3. PROMIS® is flexible: PRO tools or measures can be obtained by way of in-person interviews, written questionnaires or computer-assisted tools.
4. PROMIS® is inclusive in that all people regardless of literacy, language, physical function and life status can use its tools
The PRIMIER Registry will use the PROMIS-29 as the core data PRO collection tool along with the Perceived Stress Scale-4 (PSS-4)and the Patient Activation Measure (PAM).
Cost Indicators
In a subset of sites, we will collect cost indicators of healthcare resource utilization, including prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, physician and ER visits, as well as measures of patient functionality such as work productivity. This analysis will use the treatment utilization data obtained from the patient visit questionnaires as these data allowed us to count the specific number of treatments each patient reported over the course of the study. Patients will be asked to report the number of each type of IM treatment session received at every data collection time point. In the event that a patient skipped an interim study visit, they will be asked to report cumulative counts of IM treatment sessions received since their previous visit. We recognize that patients may not readily recall this information, so to ensure accuracy of this measure, research coordinators (or other research staff) will review the patients' medical record to quantify the type and number of visits to the participating integrative medicine clinical sites during study participation.
Statistical Design
Primary Analysis The main analyses of the PRIMIER Registry will be descriptive and summary.
Major Secondary Analyses Since the PRIMIER Registry will collect many of the same variables over a 2 year period, the secondary analyses will include examining the repeated variables and changes from baseline.
General Statistical Methods We will summarize descriptive statistics using frequencies (percentages) for categorical variables. We will report means, standard deviations, medians, quartiles, minimums, and maximums for all continuous variables.
We will use univariate analyses to detect outliers which will be subsequently submitted as queries to sites to ensure clean data. Questionnaires that can be aggregated into a score will be scored and the scores will be used for summarizing.
We will perform repeated-measures analyses of variance to detect changes in PRO and cost indicators over time. We will summarize results with a point estimate of mean change in the outcome measures between baseline and any specified follow-up visit with 95% confidence intervals. We will report P values for overall model summary, indicating any difference between any two given points. If the P value is significant (\<0.05), we will perform follow-up linear regression analyses to verify that the trends are consistent in direction throughout all study visits, indicating constant improvement or decline from visit to visit.
Exploratory Analyses We will look for variables and trends that are of interest to the collaborating investigators to explore. The appropriate analysis plan will be developed to take advantage of the wealth of data that will be collected in the PRIMIER Registry. At this time, we do not know what future analyses will be conducted.
We do not know the medical conditions for which individual participants in this PRIMIER Registry will seek help at the IM clinic, nor will we know in advance which IM interventions patients will receive. With these limitations, we cannot predefine subgroups for statistical analyses at present. However, in the future we will define post-hoc groups by clinical condition (e.g., participants with cancer, chronic pain, headaches, etc.) or IM intervention received (e.g., acupuncture, meditation, massage, etc.) for further analyses.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Integrative Medicine Clinic Attendees
All patients attending a participating Integrative Medicine clinic for clinical services will be invited to participate in the PRIMIER Registry
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Be 18 years of age or older
* Have access to a computer with internet connection and a valid email address
* Be willing to be contacted in the future by study investigators
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Bravewell Collaborative
OTHER
BraveNet
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Donald I Abrams, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
Jeffrey A Dusek, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Penny George Institute for Health and Healing, Abbott Northwestern Hospital
Diane McKee, MD MS
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Scripps Center for Integrative Medicine
La Jolla, California, United States
UCSF Osher Center for Integrative Medicine
San Francisco, California, United States
Venice Family Clinic at Simms/Mann Health and Wellness Center
Santa Monica, California, United States
University of Colorado School of Medicine, Center for Integrative Medicine
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Northwestern Integrative Medicine - Northwestern Memorial Physicians Group
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Maryland Center for Integrative Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Program for Integrative Medicine and Health Care Disparities
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Penny George Institute for Health and Healing
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Beth Israel Integrative Medicine Continuum Center for Health and Healing
New York, New York, United States
Duke Integrative Medicine Clinic
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Alliance Institute for Health and Healing
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Jefferson-Myrna Brind Center of Integrative Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
UPMC Shadyside Center for Integrative Medicine
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Vanderbilt Center for Integrative Health
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dusek JA, Gao Q, Kim RS, Abrams DI, Kligler B, Dyer NL, Hansen K, Roseen EJ, McKee MD; PRIMIER Writing Group*. Patients Receiving Integrative Medicine Effectiveness Registry (PRIMIER) of the BraveNet practice-based research network: Results of the chronic pain cohort. Integr Med Res. 2025 Jun;14(2):101141. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2025.101141. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
Dusek JA, Abrams DI, Roberts R, Griffin KH, Trebesch D, Dolor RJ, Wolever RQ, McKee MD, Kligler B. Patients Receiving Integrative Medicine Effectiveness Registry (PRIMIER) of the BraveNet practice-based research network: study protocol. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016 Feb 4;16:53. doi: 10.1186/s12906-016-1025-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00040886
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.