CHOEP + High Dose Therapy + Auto SCT for T-Cell Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT01746173

Last Updated: 2023-01-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

5 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-07-31

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The current standard of care for the frontline treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) is induction chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, many patients are unable to get to ASCT or relapse after ASCT, with a poor prognosis. Recently, a novel ASCT conditioning regimen of gemcitabine, busulfan and melphalan (Gem/Bu/Mel) has been reported to lead to favorable outcomes in this disease. We therefore designed a frontline regimen of CHOEP induction followed by Gem/Bu/Mel ASCT, and report the results of a phase 2 study of this regimen in patients with PTCL.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objectives:

Primary

* To estimate the proportion of patients alive and progression-free at 24 months after beginning induction therapy

Secondary

* To estimate the response rate (complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR)) after CHOEP x 6 and after Gem/Bu/Mel ASCT
* To estimate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM)
* To estimate the toxicity (grade 3 and above)
* To estimate the rate of successful stem cell mobilization after CHOEP in responding patients
* To estimate the proportion of patients who can successfully complete the entire treatment regimen
* To estimate the time to engraftment of neutrophil and platelet engraftment after ASCT
* To determine whether tumor DNA can be detected in peripheral blood of patients before therapy
* To evaluate the changes and prognostic relevance in detectable tumor DNA in peripheral blood after induction chemotherapy (CHOEP) and after Gem/Bu/Mel ASCT

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

T-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CHOEP + High Dose Therapy + Auto SCT

Patients received 6 cycles of induction chemotherapy: Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Etoposide and Prednisone (CHOEP) (5 if previously received 1 cycle of CHOP). CHOP was given at standard doses, with a dose of etoposide of 100 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) or 200 mg/m2 orally added on days 1-3 of each cycle. Patients who did not achieve a partial (PR) or complete (CR) remission at restaging after either 3 or 6 cycles were taken off study. Responders after 6 cycles had stem cell (SC) mobilization using filgrastim and plerixafor (if necessary) within 4 weeks of the end of induction. SC mobilization, harvesting, and reinfusion were performed per standard institutional protocol. A minimum collection of 2x106 CD34+ cells/kg was required to proceed to autologous stem cell transplant. Conditioning was comprised of gemcitabine 2700 mg/m2 on days -8 and -3, IV busulfan 105 mg/m2 days -8 to -5, and melphalan 60 mg/m2 given daily on days -3 and -2 (per MD Andersen protocol).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Doxorubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

Vincristine

Intervention Type DRUG

Etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Filgrastim

Intervention Type DRUG

Plerixafor

Intervention Type DRUG

Stem Cell Collection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Palifermin

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Busulfan

Intervention Type DRUG

Melphalan

Intervention Type DRUG

Stem Cell Transplant

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Doxorubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

Vincristine

Intervention Type DRUG

Etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Filgrastim

Intervention Type DRUG

Plerixafor

Intervention Type DRUG

Stem Cell Collection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Palifermin

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Busulfan

Intervention Type DRUG

Melphalan

Intervention Type DRUG

Stem Cell Transplant

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

cytoxan adriamycin oncovin Etopophos Toposar Etoposide phosphate neupogen G-CSF mozobil Leukapheresis KGF kepivance gemzar busulfex Stem Cell Infusion

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of T-Cell lymphoma with mandatory pathologic review at Brigham and Women's Hospital or Massachusetts General Hospital
* Measurable disease
* Candidate for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior anti-lymphoma chemotherapy (except steroids/radiotherapy for urgent palliation, one prior cycle of CHOP or up to 2 prior cycles of CHOEP)
* Pregnant or breastfeeding
* Alk-positive ACL
* Significant neuropathy precluding vincristine administration
* Known hypersensitivity to any of the agents used in the treatment
* Uncontrolled intercurrent illness
* Receiving other investigational agents
* History of a different malignancy except if disease free for at least 5 years or have cervical cancer in situ or basal cell/squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
* HIV positive on anti-retroviral therapy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Philippe Armand, MD, PhD

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philippe Armand, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

12-388

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Aza-SAHA-GBM With AutoSCT for Refractory Lymphoma
NCT01983969 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2