Clinical Evaluation of the CADence Device in Detection of Coronary Artery Diseases
NCT ID: NCT01743040
Last Updated: 2020-07-10
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1014 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-06-14
2016-02-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Evaluation of the CADenceTM System in Detection of Coronary Artery Diseases
NCT01584622
Repeatability and Reproducibility of the CADence™System
NCT03793049
Angiographic Comparison in an Observational Study of CADence (The AMBIENCE Study)
NCT02515825
PRE-DETERMINE Cohort Study
NCT01114269
Multimodality Cardiovascular Imaging for the Translation of Therapies for Vascular Activation After MI
NCT05880355
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Consented subjects will be evaluated with the CADence device and then undergo nuclear stress testing followed by either computed tomography or standard coronary angiography. The maximum expected timeframe between CADence and computed tomography Angiography or standard angiography is 6 weeks.
This is a double-blinded study. All physicians and subjects will be masked to the diagnostic results of the CADence until completion of CADence, nuclear stress, computed tomography or standard coronary angiogram testing for the subjects. Patient care will not be based on the CADence results.
Study participation will conclude after the computed tomography angiography or standard coronary angiography procedure.
computed tomograph or standard coronary angiography are considered acceptable clinical reference standards in this study and are gold standards for detection of coronary artery disease. The experimental unit of this study is the subject. Existence of clinically significant coronary artery disease in a subject is defined as the presence of at least one lesion with ≥ 70% diameter stenosis anywhere in the proximal Left anterior Descending, mid Left anterior Descending, proximal Left Circumflex, mid Left Circumflex, proximal Right Coronary Artery, mid Right Coronary Artery, distal Right Coronary Artery and Obtuse Margin 1, Obtuse Margin 2, and Ramus Intermedius if segment diameter \>2.5 mm or ≥50% diameter stenosis in the Left Main coronary arteries.
The study required sample size is 826 but may enroll up to 1,300 subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of the CADence are expected to be 80% and 73% respectively. Observed sensitivity and specificity will be compared to nuclear stress literature-based performance standards of 83% and 80% respectively using one sample non-inferiority binomial tests with a non-inferiority margin of 15 percentage points. Sample size requirements are 109 subjects with the presence of at least one lesion with ≥ ≥ 70% diameter stenosis anywhere in the proximal Left anterior Descending, mid Left anterior Descending, proximal Left Circumflex, mid Left Circumflex, proximal Right Coronary Artery, mid Right Coronary Artery, distal Right Coronary Artery and Obtuse Margin 1, Obtuse Margin 2, and Ramus Intermedius if segment diameter \>2.5 mm or ≥50% diameter stenosis in the Left MAIN coronary arteries. to test the sensitivity hypothesis and 268 subjects without the presence of at least one lesion with ≥ 70% diameter stenosis anywhere in the proximal Left anterior Descending, mid Left anterior Descending, proximal Left Circumflex, mid Left Circumflex, proximal Right Coronary Artery, mid Right Coronary Artery, distal Right Coronary Artery and Obtuse Margin 1, Obtuse Margin 2, and Ramus Intermedius if segment diameter \>2.5 mm or ≥50% diameter stenosis in the Left MAIN coronary arteries. to test the specificity hypothesis. It was assumed that 15 percent of enrolled subjects would be found to have the presence of at least one lesion with ≥ 70% diameter stenosis anywhere in the proximal Left anterior Descending, mid Left anterior Descending, proximal Left Circumflex, mid Left Circumflex, proximal Right Coronary Artery, mid Right Coronary Artery, distal Right Coronary Artery and Obtuse Margin 1, Obtuse Margin 2, and Ramus Intermedius if segment diameter \>2.5 mm or ≥50% diameter stenosis in the Left Main coronary arteries. In order to accrue 109 subjects with significant Coronary Artery Disease as defined in the protocol, 826 subjects must be enrolled. Sample sizes provide 85% power with alpha of 0.05 for each statistical test.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CADence plus Standard Angiogram
All patients who were indicated for angiogram due to results of SPECT nuclear stress test
CADence
Patients with chest pain and two or more coronary risk factors and who were already indicated for nuclear stress test were enrolled in the study. The CADence was performed prior to nuclear stress test. Patients underwent standard angiogram based upon normal clinical judgement. In all other patients a CT angiogram followed.
CADence is a handheld equipped with acoustic sensor technology, a patient booklet, remote algorithm and final report.
CADence plus CT Angiogram
All patients who were not indicated for angiogram due to results of SPECT nuclear stress test underwent CT angiogram
CADence
Patients with chest pain and two or more coronary risk factors and who were already indicated for nuclear stress test were enrolled in the study. The CADence was performed prior to nuclear stress test. Patients underwent standard angiogram based upon normal clinical judgement. In all other patients a CT angiogram followed.
CADence is a handheld equipped with acoustic sensor technology, a patient booklet, remote algorithm and final report.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CADence
Patients with chest pain and two or more coronary risk factors and who were already indicated for nuclear stress test were enrolled in the study. The CADence was performed prior to nuclear stress test. Patients underwent standard angiogram based upon normal clinical judgement. In all other patients a CT angiogram followed.
CADence is a handheld equipped with acoustic sensor technology, a patient booklet, remote algorithm and final report.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Two or more coronary artery disease risk factors as defined by:
1. Dyslipidemia: low-density lipoprotein (LDL) \>130 mm/dL or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) \<35 mm/dL or on treatment for dyslipidemia
2. Hypertension: blood pressure \>140 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) systolic, \>90 mmHg diastolic or on blood pressure altering treatment
3. Obesity: body mass index (BMI)\>28
4. Current cigarette smoking
5. Diabetes: Type 1 or 2
6. Family history: coronary disease in a first or second degree relative
Exclusion Criteria
Known coronary disease as defined as:
Prior bypass surgery or coronary stenting Q-wave infarction on a past electrocardiogram (EKG) (\>0.01 sec Q-wave duration in two adjacent leads)
Presence of pacemaker/defibrillator Presence of artificial valve Presence of obvious cyanotic or pre-diagnosed congenital heart defect and coarctation of the aorta Presence murmurs including valve lesions, ventricular septal defects, and arteriovenous (AV) fistulae.
Presence of moderate or severe valve disease as defined by \>1/6 heart murmur on physical diagnosis Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) Presence of scars on the site thorax areas Participation in trial within 30 days prior to collecting CADence data except participation in registry studies Asthma with wheezing Inability to lie flat in the supine position Acute coronary syndrome with elevated cardiac biomarkers (troponin (TP)\>3x upper limit of normal (ULN) or creatine kinase MB (CKMB) \>3x ULN) Heart Transplant Current cocaine use (within the past 24 hours, as reported by subject) Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Contraindication to computed tomography (CT) angiography
* Renal failure with glomerular filtration rate (GFR)\<50 (angio risk)
* Iodinated contrast allergy
* Elevated heart rate which cannot be controlled sufficiently to achieve a good computed tomography angiogram
* Body weight \>350lbs.
* Sinus rhythm rate greater than 100 beats per minute at screening.
* Atrial fibrillation with average heart rate of greater than 70 beats per minute on resting screening electrocardiogram (ECG).
22 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AUM Cardiovascular, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jay Thomas, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of California, Los Angeles
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Heart Center Research, LLC
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Cardiology Associates of Mobile
Mobile, Alabama, United States
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, United States
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Clearwater Cardiovascular
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Iowa Heart Center
Des Moines, Iowa, United States
MedStar Union Memorial Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Mercy Hospital
Coon Rapids, Minnesota, United States
Abbott/Minneapolis Heart Institute
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
CentraCare Heart & Vascular Center
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, United States
HealthEast - St. Joseph's Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
United Heart and Vascular Clinic
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
Mercy Hospital St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Holy Name Medical Center
Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
Columbia University
New York, New York, United States
Mt. Sinai
New York, New York, United States
North Ohio Research
Elyria, Ohio, United States
Lancaster General
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Jackson Clinic
Jackson, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1038-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.