Use of the Tx360 Nasal Applicator in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine
NCT ID: NCT01709708
Last Updated: 2018-01-26
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
41 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-09-30
2014-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Tx360® Transnasal Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine
NCT03337620
Transnasal Sphenopalatine Ganglia Block for Management of Chronic Migraines in Pediatric Patients
NCT04466826
Assessment of the Efficacy of the Transnasal Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block in the Treatment of Chronic Daily Headache in Children and Adolescents.
NCT05213065
Electrical Stimulation of the Sphenopalatine Ganglion for the Treatment of Migraine Headaches
NCT01294046
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Cluster Headache
NCT02168764
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
At Visit 1 following Informed Consent, a physical exam and vital signs will be completed. A medical, headache, and medication history (to include age, sex, height and weight, and duration and location of headache pain, as well as history of ER visits) will be collected on all subjects. Eligible subjects will be provided with a Baseline Headache Diary and instructed to treat migraines for the following month in their usual manner with their usual treatment. The daily Diary will document headache, acute treatment and response, and migraine associated symptoms (nausea, vomiting, light sensitivity, or sound sensitivity) to establish a Baseline number of headache days and severity. Visit 2 will be scheduled for 1 month following Visit 1. Following Visit 1, Visits 2-13 (treatment visits) will be scheduled to occur twice weekly (during the regular Monday - Friday work week) at least 2 days apart. Treatments should not occur on consecutive days.
At Visit 2, the Baseline Headache Diary will be reviewed and those subjects continuing to meet eligibility will be dispensed a 6-week Treatment Period Diary and complete Before Procedure questions to include the Pain Intensity Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Modified Pain Characteristic Questionnaire, and a baseline Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), have vital signs completed, and the medical, headache, and medication history updated. Subjects will be randomized 2:1 to Group A or Group B. Group A will receive treatment with 0.3 mL of 0.5% Marcaine delivered bilaterally with the Tx360™ device to the mucosa associated with the SPG. Group B will receive saline substituted for Marcaine delivered bilaterally with the Tx360TM device to the mucosa associated with the SPG.
To maintain the blinding of the treatment groups, neither the Investigator nor research personnel who are involved in evaluating the subject should prepare the study medication. An independent research staff person with no involvement in the study conduct will place study medication (either Marcaine for a subject randomized to Group A or Placebo/saline for a subject randomized to Group B) in a 1cc Luer Lok tip syringe and assemble the syringe and Tx360TM catheter as instructed in training. A label with the subject Drug Number will be placed on the device at that time. The research staff person administering the study medication will verify that the Drug Number assignment is correct.
Both Groups will be given a piece of lemon hard candy as a taste distractor.
At each treatment visit (Visits 2-13), in addition to Before Procedure questions, subjects will complete 15-minute and 30-minute After Procedure questionnaires to include the NRS and, at 30 minutes, the Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Subjects will take home a questionnaire to include the NRS, PGIC, satisfaction question, and the Modified Pain Characteristic Questionnaire to be completed at 24 hours following treatment and be instructed to return the 24-hour After Procedure questionnaire to the clinic at the next visit.
At Visits 2-15 vital signs will be completed, medications will be updated, and Non-Serious Adverse Events will be collected after the first treatment. Serious Adverse Events will be collected once the informed consent has been signed and throughout the study.
At Visits 5, 8, and 11, the Treatment Period Headache Diary will be collected, reviewed, and re-dispensed.
At Visit 13, the 1-Month Post-Treatment Period Diary will be dispensed.
The subject will return to the clinic at Visit 14 between 24 and 96 hours following the final treatment at Visit 13 to return the 24-hour After Procedure Questionnaire and complete the 1-Month Treatment Period HIT-6. The Treatment Period Diary will be collected.
At Visit 15, 1 month following the final treatment, each subject will return to the clinic and complete a 1-Month Follow Up HIT-6 and the 1-Month Follow Up Questionnaire. The 1-Month Post-Treatment Period Diary will be collected.
At 6 months following the final treatment, each subject will be phoned to complete the 6-Month Follow Up Questionnaire to include the NRS, PGIC, satisfaction question, the Modified Pain Characteristic Questionnaire, and a 6-Month Follow Up HIT-6.
Treatment Medication Subjects randomized to Group A will be administered 0.3 mL of 0.5% Marcaine delivered bilaterally with the Tx360™ device to the mucosa associated with the SPG. Twelve treatments will be administered over a period of 6 weeks.
Subjects randomized to Group B will be administered saline substituted for Marcaine delivered bilaterally with the Tx360TM device to the mucosa associated with the SPG for treatment of chronic migraine. Twelve treatments will be administered over a period of 6 weeks.
Rescue Medication Subjects will be allowed to rescue with medication mutually agreed upon by subject and Investigator at the time of screening.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Marcaine
Group A will receive treatment with 0.3 mL of 0.5% Marcaine delivered bilaterally with the Tx360™ device to the mucosa associated with the Sphenopalatine Ganglion (SPG)
Marcaine
Marcaine used as a topical local anesthetic to block the SPG by delivering Marcaine directly to the specific area of mucosa associated with the SPG.
Saline
Group B will receive saline placebo delivered bilaterally with the Tx360TM device to the mucosa associated with the SPG.
Saline
Saline
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Marcaine
Marcaine used as a topical local anesthetic to block the SPG by delivering Marcaine directly to the specific area of mucosa associated with the SPG.
Saline
Saline
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Has history of chronic migraine (with or without aura) according to the criteria proposed by the Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society for at least 3 months prior to enrollment.
3. Has onset of migraine before age 50.
4. Is able to differentiate migraine from any other headache they may experience (e.g., tension-type headache).
5. Is not currently taking a migraine preventive or has been taking preventive for at least 30 days prior to screening and agrees to not start, stop, or change medication and/or dosage during the study period.
6. If female of childbearing potential, agrees to use, for the duration of the study, a medically acceptable form of contraception as determined by the Investigator.
1. Complete abstinence from intercourse from 2 weeks prior to administration of study drug throughout the study, and for a time interval after completion or premature discontinuation from the study to account for elimination of the study drug; or,
2. Surgically sterile (hysterectomy or tubal ligation or otherwise incapable of pregnancy); or,
3. Sterilization of male partner; or,
4. Intrauterine device with published data showing lowest expected failure rate is less than 1% per year; or,
5. Double barrier method (i.e., 2 physical barriers OR 1 physical barrier plus spermicide) for a least 1 month prior to Visit 1 and throughout study; or,
6. Hormonal contraceptives for at least 3 months prior to Visit 1 and throughout study.
7. Has pain presentation in frontal, temporal, ophthalmic, maxillary, mandibular, facial, or intraoral location.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Has history of chronic migraine (with or without aura) according to the criteria proposed by the Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society for at least 3 months prior to enrollment.
3. Has onset of migraine before age 50.
4. Is able to differentiate migraine from any other headache they may experience (e.g., tension-type headache).
5. Is not currently taking a migraine preventive or has been taking preventive for at least 30 days prior to screening and agrees to not start, stop, or change medication and/or dosage during the study period.
6. If female of childbearing potential, agrees to use, for the duration of the study, a medically acceptable form of contraception as determined by the Investigator.
1. Complete abstinence from intercourse from 2 weeks prior to administration of study drug throughout the study, and for a time interval after completion or premature discontinuation from the study to account for elimination of the study drug; or,
2. Surgically sterile (hysterectomy or tubal ligation or otherwise incapable of pregnancy); or,
3. Sterilization of male partner; or,
4. Intrauterine device with published data showing lowest expected failure rate is less than 1% per year; or,
5. Double barrier method (i.e., 2 physical barriers OR 1 physical barrier plus spermicide) for a least 1 month prior to Visit 1 and throughout study; or,
6. Hormonal contraceptives for at least 3 months prior to Visit 1 and throughout study.
7. Has pain presentation in frontal, temporal, ophthalmic, maxillary, mandibular, facial, or intraoral location.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Clinvest
OTHER
Tian Medical Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tian Xia, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tian Medical Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Michigan Head Pain & Neurological Institute
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Clinvest/A Division of Banyan Group, Inc.
Springfield, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tepper SJ. A pivotal moment in 50 years of headache history: the first American Migraine Study. Headache. 2008 May;48(5):730-1; discussion 732. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01117_1.x.
Piagkou M, Demesticha T, Troupis T, Vlasis K, Skandalakis P, Makri A, Mazarakis A, Lappas D, Piagkos G, Johnson EO. The pterygopalatine ganglion and its role in various pain syndromes: from anatomy to clinical practice. Pain Pract. 2012 Jun;12(5):399-412. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2011.00507.x. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
Oluigbo CO, Makonnen G, Narouze S, Rezai AR. Sphenopalatine ganglion interventions: technical aspects and application. Prog Neurol Surg. 2011;24:171-179. doi: 10.1159/000323049. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
Windsor RE, Jahnke S. Sphenopalatine ganglion blockade: a review and proposed modification of the transnasal technique. Pain Physician. 2004 Apr;7(2):283-6.
Rosenberg M, Phero JC. Regional anesthesia and invasive techniques to manage head and neck pain. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;36(6):1201-19. doi: 10.1016/s0030-6665(03)00134-8.
Wood PB. Role of central dopamine in pain and analgesia. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008 May;8(5):781-97. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.5.781.
Boivie J. Chapter 48 Central post-stroke pain. Handb Clin Neurol. 2006;81:715-30. doi: 10.1016/S0072-9752(06)80052-7. No abstract available.
Stankewitz A, Voit HL, Bingel U, Peschke C, May A. A new trigemino-nociceptive stimulation model for event-related fMRI. Cephalalgia. 2010 Apr;30(4):475-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01968.x. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
Herrera Tolosana S, Fernandez Liesa R, Escolar Castellon Jde D, Perez Delgado L, Lisbona Alquezar MP, Tejero-Garces Galve G, Guallar Larpa M, Ortiz Garcia A. [Sphenopalatinum foramen: an anatomical study]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2011 Jul-Aug;62(4):274-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Mar 22. Spanish.
Rusu MC. Microanatomy of the neural scaffold of the pterygopalatine fossa in humans: trigeminovascular projections and trigeminal-autonomic plexuses. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2010 May;69(2):84-91.
Oomen KP, Ebbeling M, de Ru JA, Hordijk GJ, Bleys RL. A previously undescribed branch of the pterygopalatine ganglion. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Jan-Feb;25(1):50-3. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3550.
Siessere S, Vitti M, Sousa LG, Semprini M, Iyomasa MM, Regalo SC. Anatomic variation of cranial parasympathetic ganglia. Braz Oral Res. 2008 Apr-Jun;22(2):101-5. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242008000200002.
Gronseth G, Cruccu G, Alksne J, Argoff C, Brainin M, Burchiel K, Nurmikko T, Zakrzewska JM. Practice parameter: the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the European Federation of Neurological Societies. Neurology. 2008 Oct 7;71(15):1183-90. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000326598.83183.04. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
Yang lY, Oraee S. A novel approach to transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion injection. Pain Physician. 2006 Apr;9(2):131-4.
Kanai A, Suzuki A, Kobayashi M, Hoka S. Intranasal lidocaine 8% spray for second-division trigeminal neuralgia. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Oct;97(4):559-63. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael180. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
Cady RK, Saper J, Dexter K, Cady RJ, Manley HR. Long-term efficacy of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study for repetitive sphenopalatine blockade with bupivacaine vs. saline with the Tx360 device for treatment of chronic migraine. Headache. 2015 Apr;55(4):529-42. doi: 10.1111/head.12546. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
Cady R, Saper J, Dexter K, Manley HR. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of repetitive transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion blockade with tx360((R)) as acute treatment for chronic migraine. Headache. 2015 Jan;55(1):101-16. doi: 10.1111/head.12458. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Instructions for use and device training
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12-004TI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.