Left Versus Right Radial Artery and Radiation Exposure in Patients With Predictors of Trans-radial Failure

NCT ID: NCT01707524

Last Updated: 2015-09-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to measure radiation exposure during coronary angiography (CA) with a trans-radial approach (TRA), specifically comparing access via the left versus right radial artery in patients with suggested clinical predictors of TRA failure/difficult. These predictors include age \>70, female gender, height \<64 inches, and history of hypertension.The study also aims to determine difficulties encountered during left or right radial access in this specific patient population. A secondary aim is to compare the results of enrolled patients with a registry of patients where femoral access was obtained.

Currently more than 1 million percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are performed in the United States annually. There is a growing trend to perform procedures utilizing the TRA due to recent data demonstrating decreased bleeding and access-site complications compared to the femoral approach. However, the TRA approach is also know to be associated with greater radiation exposure compared to the femoral approach. Furthermore, the TRA to catheterization may be difficult in certain populations because of anatomic considerations. Though traditionally completed via canalization of the right radial artery (RRA) due to feasibility with room setup, left radial artery (LRA) access may be superior due to the shorter distance needed to reach the ascending aorta and bypassing the tortuosity of the right subclavian artery. Given the benefits of the TRA, it is important to determine how left versus right radial artery access affects parameters of radiation exposure in addition to procedural difficulty.

This study will be a prospective, randomized study of patients with suggested predictors of TRA failure/difficulty referred for coronary angiography. Patients referred for coronary angiography using the trans-radial approach will be randomly assigned to obtain arterial access via the right or left radial artery. A registry of patients referred for coronary angiography using the trans-femoral approach will be compiled. The primary outcome measure will be radiation exposure as measured by dose area product output from the coronary angiography system. Secondary measures will include the total fluoroscopy time, total dose of radiation, number of catheters used, and incidence of subclavian tortuosity. In addition, procedural complications and success rates will also be evaluated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Trans-radial approach

Randomized left versus right radial artery approach

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Randomized left versus right radial artery approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Randomized left versus right radial artery approach

Trans-femoral approach

Observational

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Randomized left versus right radial artery approach

Randomized left versus right radial artery approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients referred for cardiac catheterization procedure with 3 out of the following 4 characteristics: age ≥70 years, female gender, hypertensive, and ≤64 inches in height.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients will be excluded if they 1) underwent prior CABG with utilization of an internal mammary artery, 2) have an abnormal Allen test, 3) require emergency cardiac catheterization, 4) are planned to undergo a staged PCI procedure, 5) do not consent or are unable to give consent, or 6) are participating in another competing study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NYU Langone Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

John Coppola

Assistant Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Coppola, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NYU Langone Health

Binita Shah, MD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NYU Langone Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

New York University Langone Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

S12-02885

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.