Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II (ORBIT-AF II)

NCT ID: NCT01701817

Last Updated: 2025-02-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

13769 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-02-20

Study Completion Date

2017-07-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF II) is a multicenter, prospective outpatient disease registry to evaluate the utilization of target-specific antithrombotic agents, such as FXa (factor Xa) inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors, and associated outcomes. Importantly, the ORBIT AF II registry will permit the collection and analysis of post-approval observational data needed for evaluating the outcomes associated with these new agents when used in broader patient populations outside of clinical studies. The ORBIT-AF II registry will focus on patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) as well as those who have been recently started on a target-specific oral anticoagulant agent. Taken together, the ORBIT-AF I and ORBIT-AF II registries will offer a broad and contemporary view of AF therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The registry will be used to evaluate, describe, and document the safety of target-specific anticoagulant agents (and other antithrombotic agents) in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF), the clinical outcomes associated with their use, the treatment patterns and clinical course of patients with AF, including those who undergo cardiac procedures of interest (ablation, cardioversion, catheterization and surgery, for examples), and characteristics of patients with new onset/first-detected AF. Additionally, the registry will be used to summarize patterns of switching or discontinuation of antithrombotic agents in the United States. The registry will be a nationwide collaboration of health care providers (eg, cardiologists, internists, primary care physicians, electrophysiologists, quality improvement personnel, office/practice managers, research coordinators, and pharmacists). Target enrollment will be approximately 15,000 patients. It is anticipated that enrollment will complete in approximately 3.5 years. Consecutive patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be approached and educated about the registry. Patients who express interest will provide informed consent. Patients enrolled in the registry will be followed for up to 2 years. New patients enrolled in the registry will be followed for up to 1 year. Patient follow-up by their AF care provider will continue as scheduled according to local clinical practice. Data collection will occur at 6 month intervals for approximately 1 year from the time of enrollment of the patient (baseline, 6, and 12 months). Data capture will include demographics, medical history, cardiovascular history, vital signs, echocardiographic and laboratory data, AF status and type (paroxysmal, persistent, long-standing persistent/permanent), pharmacotherapy, contraindications to oral anticoagulant therapy, and provider specialty. Clinical outcomes and safety data capture will include major adverse cardiac events (MACEs).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

(1) patients with new onset/first detected Atrial Fibrillation (AF) diagnosed within the 6 months preceding the baseline visit; or (2) patients with AF who had initiation or transition to a FXa (Factor Xa) inhibitor or a direct thrombin inhibitor within the preceding 3 months.

Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Intervention Type OTHER

Treatment patterns of AF according to patient demographics, clinical factors, risk stratification, and geographic regions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Treatment patterns of AF according to patient demographics, clinical factors, risk stratification, and geographic regions.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-

Exclusion Criteria

* Atrial flutter only - Anticipated life expectancy less than 6 months - short lasting AF secondary to a reversible condition (e.g. hyperthyroidism, pulmonary embolism, post-cardiothoracic surgery) - Participation in a randomized trial of anticoagulation for AF at the time of enrollment - Was enrolled in the ORBIT-I Registry
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Duke Clinical Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cullman, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Dothan, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Fairhope, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Avondale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Glendale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Goodyear, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Sun City, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Alhambra, California, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Bakersfield, California, United States

Site Status

Banning, California, United States

Site Status

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Carlsbad, California, United States

Site Status

Concord, California, United States

Site Status

East Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Larkspur, California, United States

Site Status

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Los Alamitos, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Manhattan Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Mission Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Northridge, California, United States

Site Status

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

Pismo Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Pomona, California, United States

Site Status

Poway, California, United States

Site Status

Rancho Mirage, California, United States

Site Status

San Pedro, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Rosa, California, United States

Site Status

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Ventura, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Lakewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Guilford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Laurel, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Bay Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Coral Springs, Florida, United States

Site Status

Eustis, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lakeland, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miramar, Florida, United States

Site Status

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pensacola, Florida, United States

Site Status

Port Charlotte, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Wellington, Florida, United States

Site Status

Alpharetta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Athens, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Cumming, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Rome, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Smyrna, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Pocatello, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Hines, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Melrose Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

New Lenox, Illinois, United States

Site Status

North Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rock Island, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Anderson, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Bloomington, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Hammond, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

La Porte, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Munster, Indiana, United States

Site Status

South Bend, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Davenport, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Waterloo, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Elizabethtown, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Mount Sterling, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Alexandria, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Bossier City, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Natchitoches, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Rockport, Maine, United States

Site Status

Annapolis, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Randallstown, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Fall River, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Alpena, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Bay City, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Flint, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Grand Blanc, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lapeer, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Mount Clemens, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Rochester Hills, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Saint Joseph, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Traverse City, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Bridgeton, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Fremont, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Reno, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Nashua, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Bridgewater, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

East Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Flemington, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Linden, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Manalapan, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Moorestown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Mountain Lakes, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Somerset, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Toms River, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Voorhees Township, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Wayne, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Flushing, New York, United States

Site Status

Huntington, New York, United States

Site Status

Jackson Heights, New York, United States

Site Status

Jamaica, New York, United States

Site Status

Jamestown, New York, United States

Site Status

Lake Success, New York, United States

Site Status

Mineola, New York, United States

Site Status

Mount Kisco, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

North Massapequa, New York, United States

Site Status

Utica, New York, United States

Site Status

Burlington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Elizabeth City, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Pinehurst, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Sanford, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Spartanburg, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mansfield, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Miamisburg, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Worthington, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Youngstown, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Abington, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Doylestown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Ephrata, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Langhorne, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lansdale, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Sayre, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Yardley, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Woonsocket, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Easley, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Lancaster, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Beaumont, Texas, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Katy, Texas, United States

Site Status

McKinney, Texas, United States

Site Status

Odessa, Texas, United States

Site Status

Palestine, Texas, United States

Site Status

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Round Rock, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tomball, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Annandale, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Lynchburg, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Mechanicsville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Midlothian, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Newport News, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Vancouver, Washington, United States

Site Status

Walla Walla, Washington, United States

Site Status

Charleston, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Waukesha, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Wausau, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Río Grande, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Charlotte Amalie, , Virgin Islands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Puerto Rico Virgin Islands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fox KAA, Virdone S, Pieper KS, Bassand JP, Camm AJ, Fitzmaurice DA, Goldhaber SZ, Goto S, Haas S, Kayani G, Oto A, Misselwitz F, Piccini JP, Dalgaard F, Turpie AGG, Verheugt FWA, Kakkar AK; GARFIELD-AF Investigators. GARFIELD-AF risk score for mortality, stroke, and bleeding within 2 years in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 Mar 2;8(2):214-227. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab028.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33892489 (View on PubMed)

Jackson LR 2nd, Kim S, Blanco R, Thomas L, Ansell J, Fonarow GC, Gersh BJ, Go AS, Kowey PR, Mahaffey KW, Hylek EM, Peterson ED, Piccini JP; Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II. Discontinuation rates of warfarin versus direct acting oral anticoagulants in US clinical practice: Results from Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II (ORBIT-AF II). Am Heart J. 2020 Aug;226:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.04.016. Epub 2020 Apr 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32526533 (View on PubMed)

Jackson LR 2nd, Kim S, Fonarow GC, Freeman JV, Gersh BJ, Go AS, Hylek EM, Kowey PR, Mahaffey KW, Singer D, Thomas L, Blanco R, Peterson ED, Piccini JP Sr; Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation Patients and Investigators. Stroke Risk and Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Low CHA2DS2-VASc Scores: Findings From the ORBIT-AF I and II Registries. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Aug 21;7(16):e008764. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008764.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30369317 (View on PubMed)

Inohara T, Kim S, Pieper K, Blanco RG, Allen LA, Fonarow GC, Gersh BJ, Ezekowitz MD, Kowey PR, Reiffel JA, Naccarelli GV, Chan PS, Mahaffey KW, Singer DE, Freeman JV, Steinberg BA, Peterson ED, Piccini JP; ORBIT AF Patients and Investigators. B-type natriuretic peptide, disease progression and clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation. Heart. 2019 Mar;105(5):370-377. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313642. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30228248 (View on PubMed)

Steinberg BA, Shrader P, Pieper K, Thomas L, Allen LA, Ansell J, Chan PS, Ezekowitz MD, Fonarow GC, Freeman JV, Gersh BJ, Kowey PR, Mahaffey KW, Naccarelli GV, Reiffel JA, Singer DE, Peterson ED, Piccini JP; Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) II Investigators. Frequency and Outcomes of Reduced Dose Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Anticoagulants: Results From ORBIT-AF II (The Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II). J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 16;7(4):e007633. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007633.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29453305 (View on PubMed)

Kaufman BG, Kim S, Pieper K, Allen LA, Gersh BJ, Naccarelli GV, Ezekowitz MD, Fonarow GC, Mahaffey KW, Singer DE, Chan PS, Freeman JV, Ansell J, Kowey PR, Rieffel JA, Piccini J, Peterson E, O'Brien EC. Disease understanding in patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. Heart. 2018 Mar;104(6):494-501. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311800. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28790169 (View on PubMed)

Steinberg BA, Shrader P, Thomas L, Ansell J, Fonarow GC, Gersh BJ, Hylek E, Kowey PR, Mahaffey KW, O'Brien EC, Singer DE, Peterson ED, Piccini JP; Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) Investigators and Patients. Factors associated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation: Results from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II (ORBIT-AF II). Am Heart J. 2017 Jul;189:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28625380 (View on PubMed)

Steinberg BA, Simon DN, Thomas L, Ansell J, Fonarow GC, Gersh BJ, Kowey PR, Mahaffey KW, Peterson ED, Piccini JP; Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) Investigators and Patients. Management of Major Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Compared With Warfarin in Clinical Practice (from Phase II of the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation [ORBIT-AF II]). Am J Cardiol. 2017 May 15;119(10):1590-1595. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28363354 (View on PubMed)

Steinberg BA, Shrader P, Thomas L, Ansell J, Fonarow GC, Gersh BJ, Kowey PR, Mahaffey KW, Naccarelli G, Reiffel J, Singer DE, Peterson ED, Piccini JP; ORBIT-AF Investigators and Patients. Off-Label Dosing of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants and Adverse Outcomes: The ORBIT-AF II Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Dec 20;68(24):2597-2604. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.966.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27978942 (View on PubMed)

Steinberg BA, Blanco RG, Ollis D, Kim S, Holmes DN, Kowey PR, Fonarow GC, Ansell J, Gersh B, Go AS, Hylek E, Mahaffey KW, Thomas L, Chang P, Peterson ED, Piccini JP; ORBIT-AF Steering Committee Investigators. Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II: rationale and design of the ORBIT-AF II registry. Am Heart J. 2014 Aug;168(2):160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25066554 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RIVAROXAFL4002

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR100871

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Oral Anticoagulation Therapy Pilot Study
NCT01959425 TERMINATED PHASE4