Postoperatory Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT01700517

Last Updated: 2013-05-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-12-31

Study Completion Date

2012-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a worldwide realized procedure, with 600.000 surgeries performed per year in the United States, with a 673% increase estimated until 2030. Functional and pain management improvement is expected in 90% of patients, with 85% of them satisfied after the procedure.

Immediate postoperatory pain control is an important aspect to be considered. Patients submitted to TKA endure pain with variations between 40-80 (according to analog visual scale -AVS - which goes from zero to 100) during the immediate postoperatory, with slow decline in the first 24 hours. Pain classified as severe occurs in 60% and moderated in 30% of patients submitted to TKA during this period of time. Therefore adequate pain management allows an earlier rehabilitation, with a higher satisfaction rate and decrease the hospitalization period.

A multimodal control of pain can be reached by using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory, COX-2 anti-inflammatory inhibitors, peripheral nerve blocks and intra-articular anesthetics injections and decrease use of opioids given of potential collateral effects. Peripheral blockings are associated to the smallest rate of collateral effects and complications when compared to the spinal anesthesia and analgesia controlled by the patients. Studies comparing the effects of the femoral and sciatic-femoral blocking guided by ultrasonography for the analgesia control after TKA were not found.

The objective of this article is to evaluate the effect of femoral and sciatic-femoral block using ultrasonography by the analog visual scale (AVS) of pain in postoperatory of patients submitted to TKA, opioid consumption and complications associated to anesthesics procedures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Inclusion criteria were considered: Patients with TKA indication, aged from 40 to 90 years, weight between 50 and 100 kg, body mass index between 18 - 36 and patients classified pre-operatory according to the American Anesthesia Association as ASA I or II. Non-cooperative patients, with cognitive incapacity to answer pain VAS, neuromuscular or peripheral neuropathies, chronically using opioid or who didn´t want to take part of the study were taken as exclusion criteria.

The patients were separated in three groups at randomized by a computer program:

Group A - control group - spinal anesthesia, Group B - femoral nerve block + procedure realized in group A and Group C - femoral and sciatic nerves block + procedure realized in group A.

All the anesthetics procedures were realized by the same anesthetist. The standard anesthesia for the procedure was spinal anesthesia with injection of 12 to 15 mg of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine. Patients of the control group (group A) were submitted to spinal anesthesia with 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine, in isolation. Punctures in the femoral and popliteal areas were made to mask the femoral and sciatic block, respectively, with no infusion of any medication. The patients of the group B received, furthermore the standard anesthesia, the block of the femoral nerve guided by ultrasonography (Nemio 17 - Toshiba Systems Co. - Japan) and neurosimulation (Stimuplex HNS 12 - Braun - Germany) with 1 Hz stimulus frequency, 1.2 to 0.5 mA energy. The technique used was femoral area puncture, at the level of the crural fold of skin, with a 0.5% (125mg) ropivacaine associated to 75 mcg of clonidine. For the patients of the group C, in addition to the femoral blocking, the anesthesia of the sciatic nerve at the top of the popliteal fossae was realized, also guided by ultrasonography (Nemio 17 - Toshiba Systems Co. - Japan) and neurosimulation (Stimuplex HNS 12 - Braun - Germany) with 1 Hz stimulus frequency, 1.2 to 0.5 mA energy. 0.5% ropivacaine was injected associated to 75mcg clonidine. As an adjuvant for analgesia, all the patients received analgesic and anti-inflammatory permanently in postoperatory, with availability of opioids for rescue if needed. The necessity of its use and eventual complications were registered until hospital discharge.

The pain measurement was realized by the assistant author using a 10 points pain AVS (0, absence of pain, and 10 the worst imaginable pain) both ignoring which group the patient was part of. This measurement was realized during immediate pre-operatory, within 6, 12, 24, 48 hours after surgery.

Details of this study were approved by the Ethical Committee and written informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to the commencement of the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

PAIN

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

control group

Spinal anesthesia with 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine, in isolation. Punctures in the femoral and popliteal areas were made to mask the femoral and sciatic block, respectively, with no infusion of any medication.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Spinal anesthesia

Intervention Type OTHER

spinal anesthesia

Femoral nerve block

In addition to the spinal anesthesia, block of the femoral nerve guided by ultrasonography (Nemio 17 - Toshiba Systems Co. - Japan) and neurosimulation (Stimuplex HNS 12 - Braun - Germany) with 1 Hz stimulus frequency, 1.2 to 0.5 mA energy. The technique used was femoral area puncture, at the level of the crural fold of skin, with a 0.5% (125mg) ropivacaine associated to 75 mcg of clonidine.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Spinal anesthesia

Intervention Type OTHER

spinal anesthesia

Femoral nerve block

Intervention Type OTHER

Femoral nerve block

sciatic nerves block

In addition to the spinal anesthesia and femoral block, the anesthesia of the sciatic nerve at the top of the popliteal fossae was realized, also guided by ultrasonography (Nemio 17 - Toshiba Systems Co. - Japan) and neurosimulation (Stimuplex HNS 12 - Braun - Germany) with 1 Hz stimulus frequency, 1.2 to 0.5 mA energy. 0.5% ropivacaine was injected associated to 75mcg clonidine.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Spinal anesthesia

Intervention Type OTHER

spinal anesthesia

Femoral nerve block

Intervention Type OTHER

Femoral nerve block

sciatic nerves block

Intervention Type OTHER

sciatic nerves block

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spinal anesthesia

spinal anesthesia

Intervention Type OTHER

Femoral nerve block

Femoral nerve block

Intervention Type OTHER

sciatic nerves block

sciatic nerves block

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

* Inclusion criteria were considered: Patients with TKA indication, aged from 40 to 90 years, weight between 50 and 100 kg, body mass index between 18 - 36 and patients classified pre-operatory according to the American Anesthesia Association as ASA I or II.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Non-cooperative patients, with cognitive incapacity to answer pain VAS, neuromuscular or peripheral neuropathies, chronically using opioid or who didn´t want to take part of the study were taken as exclusion criteria.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Madre Teresa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lucio Honorio de Carvalho Junior, PhD, PrincipalInvestigator

PhD, COORDINATOR OF KNEE SURGERY GROUP, ASSOCIATED PROFESSOR, PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

LUCIO H CARVALHO, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

HOSPITAL MADRE TERESA - UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS

EDUARDO F TEMPONI, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

MADRE TERESA´S HOSPITAL

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Madre Teresa

Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TKR-PAIN CONTROL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.