Efficacy Study of Digoxin & Ivabradine to Treat Heart Failure

NCT ID: NCT01699776

Last Updated: 2013-11-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-04-30

Study Completion Date

2012-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It is established that at a serum concentration 0.5-0.9 ng/ml digoxin is effective in patients with heart failure, especially in the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF). It is the claimed that ivabradine by lowering heart rate reduces symptoms and improves clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure. The effect of ivabradine and digoxin in heart failure was compared.

Patients 22 patients with ischemic heart failure, AF, and diastolic dysfunction with preserved left ventricular systolic function were treated with digoxin and ivabradine for 3 months, according to a randomization cross-over design.

Collected data Medical history, physical examination, laboratory (including proBNP and serum digoxin concentrations), ECG, 6-minute walk test, and echocardiographic data (LVEF, LAVi, e/e1 ratio).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Protocol This is an investigator-started study, coded GC\&PJ-dig-Iva 2009-2012. The study was planned according to the Good Clinical Quality standards and the analysis was performed using an intention-to-treat method. The protocol was approved from an Ethics Committee. Selected patients gave their written informed consent. The family practitioners agreed and obtained the data and analysis. Collected data were analyzed from single-blinded investigators (without knowledge of the used test drug and time of collection).

Patients Study design: same patients were assigned to DIG or IVA for 3 months, according to a randomization cross-over design.

Tested drugs Commercial brands of digoxin and ivabradine were used. Digoxin was given by mouth at a dose of 0.125 mg/day, 5 times per week, for 3 months.

Ivabradine was given by mouth at a dose of 7.5 mg bid for 3 months.

Inclusion criteria Chronic and stable coronary artery disease Permanent atrial fibrillation. Diastolic dysfunction with maintained systolic function.

Exclusion criteria Unstable angina pectoris. Reduced systolic cardiac function (LVEF\<52%). Normal diastolic function. Diabetes requiring insulin. Moderate or severe renal or hepatic dysfunction. Technically insufficient echocardiographic quality.

Collected data Medical history and concomitant medications. Physical examination was performed. Laboratory values (including proBNP and serum digoxin concentration). ECG. Echocardiography. 6-minute walk test.

Statistical Analyses Data are expressed as mean ± 1 SD. Absolute values and percent changes in relation to baseline measurements were analyzed. The 2 hypotheses tested were: null hypothesis: mu1-mu2=0.0, and alternative hypothesis: mu1-mu2\>\>0.0. Comparisons within groups were made using paired t tests or the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test, where appropriate. Between-group comparisons were performed by unpaired t tests or the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. Chi-square test or Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare continuous normally or not normally distributed and qualitative variables, where appropriate. Multivariate analysis of variance was performed. A p value of \< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Failure

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Digoxin Ivabradine with atrial fibrillation.

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ivabradine

Ivabradine, 7,5 mg b.id. by mouth for 14-16 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ivabradine

Intervention Type DRUG

7.5 my b.id. by mouth for 12-14 weeks

Digoxin

Digoxin 0.125 mg once a day, 5 times per week, for 12-14 weeks by mouth.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Digoxin

Intervention Type DRUG

1.25 mg once a day by mouth, for 12-14 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ivabradine

7.5 my b.id. by mouth for 12-14 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Digoxin

1.25 mg once a day by mouth, for 12-14 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Procoralan

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

All patients had heart failure NYHA (New York Heart Association) class III. All had chronic and stable coronary artery disease which had been treated with percutaneous dilatation and stenting, and/or aortocoronary bypass. The pathology had induced a permanent AF and heart failure with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and preserved systolic function. Preserved systolic function was defined by a LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction) ≥52%. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction was defined by a e/e1 ratio \> 15 (septal spectral tissue-Doppler).

Exclusion Criteria

Unstable myocardial ischemia, reduced systolic cardiac function (LVEF\<52%), diabetes mellitus requiring insulin, moderate or severe renal or hepatic dysfunction, or technically insufficient echocardiography.
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

78 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cardiology Office, Rheinfelden, Switzerland

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cocco, Giuseppe, M.D.

INDIV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cocco G., M.D.

M.D., FESC

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Giuseppe Cocco, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cardiologist, senior lecturer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cardiology office

Rheinfelden, Canton of Aargau, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cocco G, Jerie P. Comparison between ivabradine and low-dose digoxin in the therapy of diastolic heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function. Clin Pract. 2013 Nov 4;3(2):e29. doi: 10.4081/cp.2013.e29. eCollection 2013 Aug 2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24765517 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CG&PJ-Dig-Iva 2009-2012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id