Efficacy Study of Digoxin & Ivabradine to Treat Heart Failure
NCT ID: NCT01699776
Last Updated: 2013-11-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-04-30
2012-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients 22 patients with ischemic heart failure, AF, and diastolic dysfunction with preserved left ventricular systolic function were treated with digoxin and ivabradine for 3 months, according to a randomization cross-over design.
Collected data Medical history, physical examination, laboratory (including proBNP and serum digoxin concentrations), ECG, 6-minute walk test, and echocardiographic data (LVEF, LAVi, e/e1 ratio).
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients Study design: same patients were assigned to DIG or IVA for 3 months, according to a randomization cross-over design.
Tested drugs Commercial brands of digoxin and ivabradine were used. Digoxin was given by mouth at a dose of 0.125 mg/day, 5 times per week, for 3 months.
Ivabradine was given by mouth at a dose of 7.5 mg bid for 3 months.
Inclusion criteria Chronic and stable coronary artery disease Permanent atrial fibrillation. Diastolic dysfunction with maintained systolic function.
Exclusion criteria Unstable angina pectoris. Reduced systolic cardiac function (LVEF\<52%). Normal diastolic function. Diabetes requiring insulin. Moderate or severe renal or hepatic dysfunction. Technically insufficient echocardiographic quality.
Collected data Medical history and concomitant medications. Physical examination was performed. Laboratory values (including proBNP and serum digoxin concentration). ECG. Echocardiography. 6-minute walk test.
Statistical Analyses Data are expressed as mean ± 1 SD. Absolute values and percent changes in relation to baseline measurements were analyzed. The 2 hypotheses tested were: null hypothesis: mu1-mu2=0.0, and alternative hypothesis: mu1-mu2\>\>0.0. Comparisons within groups were made using paired t tests or the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test, where appropriate. Between-group comparisons were performed by unpaired t tests or the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. Chi-square test or Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare continuous normally or not normally distributed and qualitative variables, where appropriate. Multivariate analysis of variance was performed. A p value of \< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ivabradine
Ivabradine, 7,5 mg b.id. by mouth for 14-16 weeks.
Ivabradine
7.5 my b.id. by mouth for 12-14 weeks
Digoxin
Digoxin 0.125 mg once a day, 5 times per week, for 12-14 weeks by mouth.
Digoxin
1.25 mg once a day by mouth, for 12-14 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ivabradine
7.5 my b.id. by mouth for 12-14 weeks
Digoxin
1.25 mg once a day by mouth, for 12-14 weeks.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
60 Years
78 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cardiology Office, Rheinfelden, Switzerland
OTHER
Cocco, Giuseppe, M.D.
INDIV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cocco G., M.D.
M.D., FESC
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Giuseppe Cocco, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cardiologist, senior lecturer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cardiology office
Rheinfelden, Canton of Aargau, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cocco G, Jerie P. Comparison between ivabradine and low-dose digoxin in the therapy of diastolic heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function. Clin Pract. 2013 Nov 4;3(2):e29. doi: 10.4081/cp.2013.e29. eCollection 2013 Aug 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CG&PJ-Dig-Iva 2009-2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id